Manny Chav said:  I would not recommend that anyone attend the seminary, as it now stands. 

Including your brother?

I reject the accusations which I know to be false, such as with the animal sacrifices and the fire pit, and more.

I acknowledge as true the accusations of financial chicanery, of the unreasonable demands on those who supported the seminary, of the issues with Bishop Ambrose, the issues with misrepresentation of the seminary and the non-profit status to the faithful and to the government, of the distortions of facts and events, the mistreatment of many who have visited or worked at the seminary, and more.

I do not accept, nor will I promote, those accusations which have absolutely nothing substantial within them.

I have seen Pablo’s “room” at the seminary. I  had to clean the bloody place. It is nothing as it has been described here. It is a mess, as he doesn’t care much about organizing his room.

—

As a side, I have no problem with going to a Mass offered by Father Pfeiffer, as he is a valid priest. His problems exist outside the sacrifice of the Mass.

I would not recommend that anyone attend the seminary, as it now stands.

That particular Blasak has a lot of medical problems, which have either been ignored or not well treated, for a number of unfortunate reasons. He is more or less a good kid, one who deserves better than to be unjustly mocked by a total stranger.

His lifespan has been significantly reduced by his condition, and he is living in a highly unstable environment. Do we have to drag him further down than he already is?

All good questions.

The answer is that Fr. Pfeiffer's "seminary" and his "convent" with one postulant are both a sick joke.
Male and female religious, especially very young novices/seminarians inexperienced in virtue, should not be in that close of contact. Human nature.

The household in the video is mostly one family. But that young lady ("postulant") is not related to most of the "seminarians". It is not prudent to have them only a stone's throw from each other, day and night.

I'm sure the pre-Vatican II Catholic Church and (1917) Code of Canon Law would have something to say about that!

There are two postulants in their "convent".  A blaszak and another young lady from CO.

The postulants live in a small building which was built behind the priest's house.   They live ON THE SAME, EXACT grounds as the seminarians, not even across the street, directly behind hernandez... (scary thought considering constance's experience with hernandez).

Two of the three seminarians in the video are the postulants brothers.

And a poor Daddy spends his easter alone ? ? Or is he in the Video?
What kind of Catholics are they? It is very bad. Our Lord Jesus Christ would die again to save this marriage and nothing happens here? It is accepted that a mother takes away from her husband his 7 children? Does Fr. Pfeiffer have nothing to say about it? Is this called: being a Traditional Catholic??
"MANUEL CHAVEZ"one question, how do you like it and do you think this is a good example to give to others?
And Fr. Hewko was quiet and accepted that this family collapsed? What did they do to save this marriage?
What´s about the dogma? The sacrament of marriage? Has it not a deep and serious meaning for these people?
But above all, does the law allow that a daddy can´t see his children?
Or maybe the daddy is dangerous and he could be putting his children in danger, then of course that's different.