CathInfo.com

Here’s the bottom line:  speculation is defined as an “educated guess”.  It is a projection based on some facts, but is not 100% proveable (at the time).  It is factual that Pablo has messed with lay exorcisms in the past.  It is factual that he has some sort of “diablo” nickname.  It is factual that he knows about curses and such things, because he has accused others (projection?) of being involved.  It is factual that animals are killed during rituals and in strange ways, often burned.  It is factual that, in Boston, animals have died in strange ways, with Pablo’s dog being burned.  It is factual that Pablo is not a practicing Catholic and has stated openly that he dislikes Trads.  It is factual that he is a liar, bully and a cheat.  

Add all of this up, and it’s valid speculation (with much circuмstantial evidence) that Pablo is involved in witchcraft of some sort.  Doesn’t mean he is, but it’s not wrong to think it’s possible.  

The only reason this thread really exploded is because no one expected a defense of Pablo from you in the way you did it. Speaking for myself, I wouldn't have posted at all had that not been the case.

Martin, I think it's time you let Pablo fight his own battles. CathInfo will be alright, and I don't think there's a court in the country that will take a libel case about witchcraft. The only people who really care or would be concerned here are traditional Catholics. This is primarily an internal issue until someone is willing to press charges over there. If we could get past a handful of posts from you that did not require constant sifting through apparent half statements and strategic omissions, if we could trust you, your input wouldn't be held to so much scrutiny.

Take a few steps back and look at the bigger picture.

Putting all your testimony together in a single, comprehensive  and straightforward manner would go a long way to fix that lack of trust. It's kind of tough right now to take your word as it is, now that you're playing El Diablo's advocate with Catholicus' account and everyone else who suspects occult activity (everyone posting here). I don't believe anyone is interested in talking about legal ramifications with a cook/chapel coordinator/journalist who was caught up in it... unless you're planning to do something...

This is the largest site for the resistance. They come here. They read the stories; the real, the exaggerated, the false. All are given equal weight, as long as it fits the accepted narrative. 

There have been plenty of people who questioned Catholicus' story and there were some who verified parts of it.
.

Anyone who questions said narrative are insulted and have their characters called into question. 

All because of some unsubstantiated claims made by a nameless and faceless individual. 

It's not ALL unsubstantiated.  SOME. OF. IT. IS. TRUE!!  To say it's all unsubstantiated is A LIE!

For heaven's sake, Manuel, we just went through this 2 pages ago and you're back speaking false generalizations and contradicting yourself.  You are either retarded or dishonest.  Either way, you have no integrity with me.