Author Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post) (Read 39177 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #285 on:** April 30, 2019, 01:37:51 PM »

Here's what we know.

FACT -- Dog died. Dog was burned in a fire pit.

SPECULATION (without proof) -- Dog killing/burning was part of a Satanic ritual.

SPECULATION (without proof) -- Dog was poisoned.

SPECULATION (without proof) -- Dog was poisoned by the neighbor because he hated it.

SPECULATION (without proof) -- Pablo did NOT poison the dog.

SPECULATION (without proof) -- Dog killing/burning was NOT part of a Satanic ritual.

So, Martin, you counter the first SPECULATION above with several of your own. You counter speculation with speculation, and mistake your own speculations for FACT. That's why your denials are not credible.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #286 on:** April 30, 2019, 01:49:28 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez on April 30, 2019, 01:46:56 PM

I have credible witnesses.

For WHAT?

Ladislaus · « **Reply #287 on:** April 30, 2019, 01:51:09 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez on April 30, 2019, 01:46:56 PM

I have credible witnesses. The accusation of Satanic animal sacrifice of the dog does not even have a credible, named accuser, let alone any sort of witnesses. It is a baseless accusation, without merit and none who have come forward to support it.

It's SPECULATION, idiot. Do you not even understand English? "Baseless accusation" ... like accusing the neighbor of killing the dog?

Ladislaus · « **Reply #288 on:** April 30, 2019, 01:55:17 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez on April 30, 2019, 01:51:30 PM

Those who lived there during the whole dog situation, who knew why the dog was burned and who made that decision.

No, that's part of the FACT part that everyone agrees on. Oh, for crying out loud.

You resemble your Avatar more and more with each post.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #289 on:** April 30, 2019, 01:58:00 PM »

Initially, you categorically stated without proof: "Pablo did not kill the dog." Later, in a moment of lucidity, you stated that you considered it "unlikely" that Pablo killed the dog. Look at the difference between those two statements, the first involves overreach, presenting as fact something you had no proof for, while the second acknowledges that it's your opinion that that you considered it merely unlikely (tacitly admitting thereby that you had no proof).

You didn't study logic at the Pfeiffer compound, did you?

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post) (Read 39177 times)

Ladislaus

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

Ladislaus

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

Ladislaus

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

Ladislaus

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

Ladislaus

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)