Manuel Chavez earlier denying the existence of a fire pit and dog being burned therein:
I reject the accusations which I know to be false, such as with the animal sacrifices and the fire pit, and more
So now you admit that the dog was burned in a fire pit even though earlier you "knew" this "to be false"?
ManuelChavez:
Bradley burned the body on his own fire pit
Is your story evolving?
ManuelChavez:
I remember that dog. It died.
Pablo liked that dog. He did not kill it, nor was it sacrificed to the gods.
I remember the deaths of a few animals, including one dog that was shot by a neighbor, and one that was hit by a car. Another one was killed by an animal trap set up by a seminarian. None of these deaths can be attributed to the demonic.
The bonfires were to allow the seminarians to relax after the day, and before lights out. It was not some ritualistic devil worship. It was a fire pit, and nothing more.
Some people just want to think the absolute worst of others, and so they turn the smallest things into the greatest evils known to man, as long as it fits their own agendas.
There are other, more easily docuмented and verifiable issues with Boston. One needn’t meddle with heresay and second-hand rumors from those with an axe to grind.
So the dog "just died". Now you revise it to state that the dog was "poisoned". You know this how? Was an autopsy performed?
You state that they just had bonfires in said "fire pit" for relaxation.
But now you admit that the dog was burned in said fire pit.
So a dog dies mysteriously and is burned in the fire pit.
Your spin was that the dog died of mysterious causes and nothing happened in the fire pit.
If the dog was poisoned, do you have proof that Pablo did not do the poisoning?
Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post) (Read 39190 times)