Author Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post) (Read 39209 times)

Incredulous · « **Reply #275 on:** April 30, 2019, 12:34:06 PM »

Let's playback the dog debate:

The dumb Dougherty's are delighted to debate whether a dog can be in the chapel or not... a convenient diversion.

The hound dog video verified an expensive pedigree was on the property.

BTW, Hernandez bragged about the pricey dog to the "trads"he hates.

He bragged because he knew the dog was expensive and the faithful wondered where he got the money to buy it? Out of the chapel coffers, of course.

But Then, the poor houndoggy died! Gee, but how?

The other, mutt breeds on the property were poisoned. Hernandez used to brag about that too.

But where did they bury poor hound-doggy? We want to visit his grave.

Hound-doggy was burned in a bonfire and the doggy's ashes ended-up in the chapel faithful' potluck meal.

:farmer:

B from A · « **Reply #276 on:** April 30, 2019, 12:35:30 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous on April 30, 2019, 06:48:06 AM

Okay, please wait Seraphina while Martin checks with his brother Chris, who will go into the rectory to ask ...Hernandez ... about the accuracy of your details.

Quote from: Ladislaus on April 30, 2019, 12:26:41 PM

Indeed, if you got the color of the towels wrong, then you're completely discredited !

.

Matthew · « **Reply #277 on:** April 30, 2019, 12:46:52 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez on April 30, 2019, 12:40:48 PM

The dog was poisoned by a neighbor who hated the dog, and Bradley burned the body on his own fire pit, not the barbecue pit, which was dug too deep by a seminarian, and later filled in.

Do you have evidence that this is true? Did you catch the neighbor in the act? Or might Pablo have done the poisoning and then blamed it on the neighbor?
Come on, your testimony has to be sifted and verified as well. Sauce for the goose is good for the gander...

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #278 on:** April 30, 2019, 12:51:00 PM »

Quote from: Matthew on April 30, 2019, 12:46:52 PM

Do you have evidence that this is true? Did you catch the neighbor in the act? Or might Pablo have done the poisoning and then blamed it on the neighbor?
Come on, your testimony has to be sifted and verified as well. Sauce for the goose is good for the gander...

From my brother, from other seminarians, from Bradley (owner of said fire pit), and from the Pfeiffer children.
That was Pablo’s dog. It is unlikely that he would kill his own dog. I believe the witness accounts of those at Boston, especially since one or two have no love for Pablo whatsoever.

But why believe any of us “dumb Dougherty’s”? Right? We’re under the spell of a warlock!

Pax Vobis · « **Reply #279 on:** April 30, 2019, 12:59:18 PM »

Manuel said: "I have accepted that" (i.e. that Catholicus' testimony has not been proven false).
.
Yet the post beforehand, you referred to Catholicus' story as "deceit". ?? Which is it, Manuel? Is the story 1) part true and part unverfied or 2) is it deceit?
.
Please apologize for calling Catholicus' story deceitful, without any evidence.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post) (Read 39209 times)

Incredulous

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

B from A

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

Matthew

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

ManuelChavez

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)

Pax Vobis

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)