CathInfo.com

I answered the questions that I could answer, even though they were loaded questions, and their aims were entirely clear, as well as being misguided.
They were to insinuate that the dog was killed in an animal sacrifice and burned upon the “altar” that was the fire pit. That accusation can still be found in the archives of CathInfo.
It was not a hellhound. It was a hound, a creature of God, an innocent and dumb animal, one that did nothing wrong, except for living in Boston. You can’t even muster some decency for a dead dog, let alone another soul whom you encounter on the internet.
Surely you can do better. Have some consideration that you are dealing with other souls on the internet, not mindless, soulless  bots. We are all flawed and sinful, each in our own ways. You are no better than I, and I am no better than anyone here.
I question the validity of the story. I must admit that I cannot determine with 100% certainty that the story is false, nor should I do so.
I must hold myself to the same level of accountability as I do for others.
I should be able to question the validity of the story, while making sure I do not question or denigrate the character of the writer.
I don’t think it’s too much to ask others to do the same.

More deflections.

What better way to address all concerns than to consolidate all your admissions in one place for all to see and to easily access? I'm not about to slavishly search your profile or the archives.

I'm not concerned about the pit at this moment, but it is a testament to how evil things are over there that it isn't some great stretch of imagination to consider witchcraft. There's no sense in trying to howl at the moon over it, Pablo has earned the reputation! Speaking of howling, now you're offended by "hellhound?" Challenge accepted for the selectively oversensitive. I'm only going to wear these kiddie gloves once:

To your limited knowledge, was the most honorable and well-intentioned canine of El Pablo Diablo allowed into the Chapel at Boston Kentucky and or into any other Church?

That supposed “unfinished business” is my business, not yours. I don’t have to air it all out or settle scores or beat myself to death with guilt to have valid questions about the testimony.

You don't have to do anything. I just gave you a clue about how to end unwanted criticism. Address the concerns as transparently as you can and you could make things easier for yourself and everyone involved. Or just keep doing the same tired routine and get more and more miserable. It's all up to you.

I will honor your attempt to be less confrontational.

I remember the dog in the church.

The doors were left open at times, such as during manualia, and on especially hot days. Wasps would fly in unannounced, as would other critters. The dog was no different.

When I saw the dog in the church, it occurred to me that God gives a sixth sense to some creatures. This dog could have gone anywhere on the grounds to seek solace. It went to the chapel, the best place at the seminary.

The dog knew where to go for peace; the house of God, in the presence of His Son, Our Lord, in the tabernacle. The dog reminded me of Mary Magdalene at the feet of Our Lord, or of the publican in the temple, as it lay peacefully near the doors of the chapel.

“Lord have mercy on me, a sinner.”

:applause: Bravo!  :applause:

I knew there was a reason you were holding back. 

I will honor your attempt to be less confrontational.

I remember the dog in the church.

The doors were left open at times, such as during manualia, and on especially hot days. Wasps would fly in unannounced, as would other critters. The dog was no different.

When I saw the dog in the church, it occurred to me that God gives a sixth sense to some creatures. This dog could have gone anywhere on the grounds to seek solace. It went to the chapel, the best place at the seminary.

The dog knew where to go for peace; the house of God, in the presence of His Son, Our Lord, in the tabernacle. The dog reminded me of Mary Magdalene at the feet of Our Lord, or of the publican in the temple, as it lay peacefully near the doors of the chapel.

“Lord have mercy on me, a sinner.”

Okay, now that I've had some time to really take this in, here are a few serious observations.

- This dog was not a service dog and it had no place inside the chapel. Insects on a hot day I could understand, but a dog must be leashed or confined to another area if there was ever a chance of having it walk in on its own. Its presence was a desecration. That it belonged to Pablo the Desecrator is no surprise.

- That the dog might have preferred hanging out in or near the chapel instead of say, his owner, could be interpreted as an unsettling sign.

- That you carefully avoided answering this question in the affirmative until you framed it with "saint" Guinefort levels of animal sanctity implies that you are aware of how bad it looks to have a dog run around the same place as Holy Mass.

- That this dog would remind you of a saint at all is somewhat disturbing to be if not outright absurd. For the first time I'm actually concerned for your mental state, Martin.

I will continue to pray for you, but please do yourself a big favor and let the whole Boston topic go unless you are truly prepared to do what must be done to speak out against it. We need to expose every single scrap of darkness in that place. I have reason to believe you have been holding back and I'm asking you to drop the defenses and to find the strength to put it all out there. Until then, God Bless. I really mean it, man!