Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)  (Read 39258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #235 on: April 29, 2019, 01:06:21 PM »
People don't always easily shake off the effects of being involved in a cult - ...

THIS ^^^

You hit the nail on the head.  That's why cults often require formal "deprogramming".  I think that Father Hewko too is in the cult-withdrawal phase.  For both him and Martin, it may take years and years to undo all that.

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #236 on: April 29, 2019, 01:06:42 PM »
Indeed, but read again how much of Catholicus' story has in fact been verified.  You keep ignoring that.  Ignore if you will the parts that have not been verified, the soup incident, etc.  But EVEN IF YOU TAKE THAT OUT, the case against Pablo is damning.  Then combined the corroborated parts of Catholicus' story with Seraphina's account, and a picture emerges.

You believe Seraphina, and didn't ask her details to verify her story.  Why?  You tipped your hand when you dismissed occult practices as "mumbo jumbo".  Seraphina's you find credible, whereas Catholicus' do not ... both for no reasons other than your emotions.  Why didn't you grill Seraphina about the color of the bath robe, details about exactly when the fake blessing incident took place, etc.?
Seraphina’s testimony answered all the questions before I had to ask them. 


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #237 on: April 29, 2019, 01:09:08 PM »
Seraphina’s testimony answered all the questions before I had to ask them.

You did not ask the same degree of questions, and she did not provide them.  You were asking Catholicus for the name of the restaurant and specific dates.  You didn't grill Seraphina about the exact dates of these incidents nor did she provide them.  You didn't ask her questions akin to where the cigar holes were, i.e. what color the alleged bathrobe was, etc.  So this is nonsense.

If I were staying in a strange place, I would not necessarily recall the layout of the place.  If I was eating at a restaurant I did not frequent regularly, I would probably not be able to recall its name even days later, much less months.  Catholicus bowed out because of your hostile grilling.  You did your job by eliminating a potential source of information against Pablo.

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #238 on: April 29, 2019, 01:17:59 PM »
Let's also not forget how impossible it would be for Pablo to put anything up on his wall when Manuel wasn't around. As we all know Pablo tightly controlled access for everyone except Mudskipper Chavez.

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #239 on: April 29, 2019, 01:26:26 PM »
You did not ask the same degree of questions, and she did not provide them.  You were asking Catholicus for the name of the restaurant and specific dates.  You didn't grill Seraphina about the exact dates of these incidents nor did she provide them.  You didn't ask her questions akin to where the cigar holes were, i.e. what color the alleged bathrobe was, etc.  So this is nonsense.

If I were staying in a strange place, I would not necessarily recall the layout of the place.  If I was eating at a restaurant I did not frequent regularly, I would probably not be able to recall its name even days later, much less months.  Catholicus bowed out because of your hostile grilling.  You did your job by eliminating a potential source of information against Pablo.
Seraphina’s testimony answered all of that. It was during the time of the retreats of 2015.
I was right about your reading comprehension skills needing work, apparently.