Let’s continue to support a testimony that:
1. Cannot specify what month or even what year the story took place...
2. Could not verify the restaurant or even the city of the restaurant.
3. Could not remember what carpet, in what building, was “burned” by a cigar.
But ...
The writer CAN remember the precise “witchcraft” formulas in exact detail after having glanced at the book for a few moments, and can recall the dialogue between Pablo and the chef at the restaurant, which supposedly took place in the kitchen of the restaurant they could not recall or locate on a map, while the writer was at the table with father.
Wow.
Do I need to list out the points again from Catholicus' story that have been independently verified by other posters? I've done this several times already, but you keep ignoring it.
Depending on how long ago this took place, many of these details could be forgotten. Are you going to dispute Seraphina's story if she can't remember the color of the infamous bathrobe?
You're a complete shill and have discredited yourself.
FACT: [corroborated by none other than yourself] Pablo rarely attends Mass, and on the rare occasion he does it's not to actively participate but to make connections.
FACT: [corroborated] OLMC personnel were telling people to stop wearing St. Benedict's medals.
FACT: [corroborated] Pablo asks for pictures of people and their families to "pray for them".
FACT: [corroborated] People who run afoul of Pablo receive menacing phone calls (often in Spanish) from various different localities.
Those are all elements of Catholicus' story that have since been corroborated on this thread, giving her(?) a significant amount of credibility.
Only the soup incident, cigar incident, and appearance of the knife remain unconfirmed. While these incidents are certainly subject to interpretation, I do not believe Catholicus made them up. She could have come up with much more juicy stories if she were intent on fabricating something.
Add to these corroborated facts:
FACT: Pablo dabbled with doing exorcisms without requisite authority, and exorcists say that it's very dangerous and opens people up to being taken over by those forces.
FACT: Pablo had the nickname "El Brujo" and "El Diablo".
FACT: Pablo stated that Father Voigt had placed a "curse" on his son to cause his death, showing that Pablo is very conversant with things like curses.
FACT: Fathers Pfeiffer and Father Hewko have been acting in extraordinarily irrational ways ... without any obvious natural explanation.
So all the pieces, even without the soup incident and the burning cigar -- all are STRONG WARNING SIGNS that Pablo is mobilizing occult forces against the people at OLMC.
Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post) (Read 39432 times)