They claim he redid the consecration off camera. I hope he is a real Bishop, rather than having a bunch of invalid traditional priests running around.
Even then there's another problem. Bishop Webster's priestly ordination came through a line deriving from a man who ...
1) was consecrated by one Clemente Dominguez, of Palmar de Troya fame.
2) was ordained a priest in some Old Catholic sect that may or may not have been valid.
Clemente was an insurance salesman with no training in Latin, and could easily have botched the form ... although the consecrations themselves were witnessed by large crowds and assisted by trained clerics.
But even if he got it right, unless there had been a conditional ORDINATION first, he may or may not have become a valid bishop. Now, someone produced a docuмent which claims that this priest was conditionally ordained, but I don't know whether it can be authenticated.
Bishop Webster was a good friend of mine before he got ordained and consecrated, so I too hope that he's a valid bishop, but I could not approach his Sacraments given this state of positive doubt. Whether Clemente got the form right would be negative doubt, but the ordination line is positive.