Author Topic: Peter Wensierski and Maximilian Krah (Read 11012 times)

Diego · « **Reply #25 on:** July 03, 2012, 12:48:10 AM »

Quote from: Diego

Expectedly Krah's Facebook page has been scabbed. Who has screen captures?

That should be "scrubbed," but the spell-checker made a substitution I did not notice until too late to edit.

On a Mac Command-Shift-3 and Command-Shift-4 give full screen and selective screen captures respectively. On other PCs "I dunno."

Telesphorus · « **Reply #26 on:** July 03, 2012, 02:46:27 PM »

What Archbishop Lefebvre said of those who are doing what Bishop Fellay is doing:

Quote

And we must not waver for one moment either in not being with those who are in the process of betraying us. Some people are always admiring the grass in the neighbor's field. Instead of looking to their friends, to the Church's defenders, to those fighting on the battlefield, they look to our enemies on the other side. "After all, we must be charitable, we must be kind, we must not be divisive, after all, they are celebrating the Tridentine Mass, they are not as bad as everyone says" —but THEY ARE BETRAYING US —betraying us! They are shaking hands with the Church's destroyers. They are shaking hands with people holding modernist and liberal ideas condemned by the Church. So they are doing the devil's work.

JPaul · « **Reply #27 on:** July 04, 2012, 12:52:28 PM »

Quote from: magdalena

It's very unnerving that the SSPX leadership has given him so much power and control. It will be difficult to wrench themselves from his hold. He even looks sinister. But maybe it was just a bad day.
:shocked:

Your fears are not without merit. We must acknowledge that the people with whom Mr. Krah are associated are international criminals. Tel Aviv University is no more than a Mossad front which produces many Zionist operatives at all levels.

It is a hotbed of revolutionaries and intelligence activity. Objectively, this places the SSPX in association with the myriad of criminal activities of these groups. The implications are beyond serious. They are disasterous.

With Mr.Krah placing himself publicly with such approving proximity to a group which has been docuмented to have engaged in murder, assasination, drug trafficking, the sex trade, terrorism, and many other heinous activities, it is entirely baffling as to why Bishop Fellay has not immediately distanced the Society from him.

This is a very grave situation and one which must be forced into the light of day.

John Grace · « **Reply #28 on:** July 04, 2012, 01:06:32 PM »

Quote

it is entirely baffling as to why Bishop Fellay has not immediately distanced the Society from him.

I'm not baffled as to why Bishop Fellay hasn't distanced the Society from Krah but am more baffled by the indifference shown by those attending the chapels though being honest what can people do. The SSPX must be more pro-Jєωιѕн than they would like people to believe.Why did they remove articles about Jews and treat a Bishop who told the truth about the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' in such a manner?

I once had an angry phone call because I suggested people were stupid.

JPaul · « **Reply #29 on:** July 04, 2012, 01:59:59 PM »

Quote from: John Grace

Quote
it is entirely baffling as to why Bishop Fellay has not immediately distanced the Society from him.

I'm not baffled as to why Bishop Fellay hasn't distanced the Society from Krah but am more baffled by the indifference shown by those attending the chapels though being honest what can people do. The SSPX must be more pro-Jєωιѕн than they would like people to believe.Why did they remove articles about Jews and treat a Bishop who told the truth about the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' in such a manner?

I once had an angry phone call because I suggested people were stupid.

Actually John, ignorant is more accurate. With some it is deliberate, others have been socially re-engineered to the point of manifesting the symptoms of stupid. I think that a lot of the SSPX priests are ignorant of the mentioned realities. I do notice that they as a rule do not mention it.
In all the sermons against the deal, not once has anyone addressed this manifest scandal. There again, another mystery?