Author Topic: Peter Wensierski and Maximilian Krah (Read 11009 times)

JPaul · « **Reply #20 on:** July 02, 2012, 02:11:29 PM »

Quote from: John Grace

Quote from: John Grace
It's interesting to look again at the note issued at the request of Bishop Fellay in light of recent events.From May 2011

Quote
From the latest GB district newsletter:

IGNIS ARDENS
The Ignis Ardens website states that 'it is a Taditionalist Catholic forum with a pro-SSPX bias... but that 'this forum's support for SSPX is not to be taken as evidence of the SSPX's support for this forum.'
The latter part of this statement is certainly true with regard to Ignis Ardens' involvement to date in a campaign which undermines the authority of the Society's General House.
I refer to the section entitled 'Krahgate,' which, under the cover of anonymity, raises serious allegations against Menzingen's lawyer, Maximilian Krah, and, by extension, against the Superior General himself.
Whilst this file, which apparently originated elsewhere, was recently removed at the initiative of the Ignis Ardens moderator, the damage caused will be much more difficult to repair given the public nature of the internet and the propensity for calumny and detraction to spread.
In this regard Bishop Fellay does not exclude having recourse to judicial process, and this should serve a warning to those who think they can commit public slander via the internet with impunity.
Father Paul Morgan."

No allegations were ever raised against the Menzingen lawyer nor has it ever been stated 'Krahgate' is false.

As stated IA is not even an official SSPX website so perhaps Fr Morgan was under duress when issuing that note. It's more a case of Bishop Fellay and Max not liking what is written about them than allegations been made. IA was obviously meant to be a scapegoat.'Krahgate' remains on Fisheaters and non English language fora so obviously IA were to be made examples of and lamentably they removed the file. I still feel they should have stood their ground against the bullies.

With a difference between legal and lawful, I am of the understanding a request was made to have it removed. If I had been Clare, I would have refused to remove the file and allowed it to go to court. Just my personal view here.

John, this was a glaring example of the new aggressive and worldly policy of Menzingen. It was unjust and thuggish but, it apparently it worked quite well sending so many scattering and into hiding. Fearing to even mention the name of Mr. Krah or the enshrouded business dealings of the same and the Superior.

They never had to authenticate the alleged calumys or so called slanders.

So very reminiscent of those well worn tactics of another group of inciting a fear of that group,(read the bible), and a fearful dread of being labeled as having evil intention. Sort of like being called an anti....something or other.

There is in all likelyhood a smoking gun or key to this whole scandalous drama but it has been made unaccessible due to guile and cleverness.

Wessex · « **Reply #21 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:14:17 PM »

Both IA and the UK district have tried to put a lid on the Krah affair. As long as the lawyer remains a blue-eyed boy of Menzingen, this will remain the case no matter what happens to their home-grown Bp. Williamson. But this revelation has to be a a vivid sign of a big policy change on the part of the leadership. What will happen to the constant mantra of the Society as regards the centuries-old malevolent Judaic and Freemasonic influence on the Church? Will it go the way of Vatican 2 criticism and be watered down until it disappears? Worse, be replaced with new mantra exposing schism and anti-semitism among traditionalists? Krah is leading the way.

JPaul · « **Reply #22 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:52:38 PM »

Quote from: Wessex

Both IA and the UK district have tried to put a lid on the Krah affair. As long as the lawyer remains a blue-eyed boy of Menzingen, this will remain the case no matter what happens to their home-grown Bp. Williamson. But this revelation has to be a a vivid sign of a big policy change on the part of the leadership. What will happen to the constant mantra of the Society as regards the centuries-old malevolent Judaic and Freemasonic influence on the Church? Will it go the way of Vatican 2 criticism and be watered down until it disappears? Worse, be replaced with new mantra exposing schism and anti-semitism among traditionalists? Krah is leading the way.

You have predicted a most possible future.

John Grace · « **Reply #23 on:** July 02, 2012, 03:58:49 PM »

Quote from: Wessex

Both IA and the UK district have tried to put a lid on the Krah affair. As long as the lawyer remains a blue-eyed boy of Menzingen, this will remain the case no matter what happens to their home-grown Bp. Williamson. But this revelation has to be a a vivid sign of a big policy change on the part of the leadership. What will happen to the constant mantra of the Society as regards the centuries-old malevolent Judaic and Freemasonic influence on the Church? Will it go the way of Vatican 2 criticism and be watered down until it disappears? Worse, be replaced with new mantra exposing schism and anti-semitism among traditionalists? Krah is leading the way.

The SSPX removed articles on the Jews from their websites. Some articles by Fr Denis Fahey, whom Bishop Tissier and others have regularly encouraged others to read. The writings of Fr Fahey contained an Imprimatur and were never placed on the Index.

Let's not forget what happened to 'Faith Imperiled by Reason: Benedict XVI's Hermeneutics'.

So nobody should be too surprised at the direction Bishop Fellay was going in. Quite alot of the sermons atleast here in Ireland were very stage managed, preparing the way, spoon feeding type sermons.

A few years ago a priest stationed here brought the SSPX youth group to Rome for a pilgrimage and recently when Cardinal Burke visited Ireland he told a SSPX priest to "keep up the good work". The priest he said this to is pro-agreement.

It was necessary to stab Bishop Williamson in the back because those 30 pieces of Vatican Silver were so appealing. It always disgusts me to sell out your principles to get a deal.

magdalena · « **Reply #24 on:** July 02, 2012, 11:54:05 PM »

It's very unnerving that the SSPX leadership has given him so much power and control. It will be difficult to wrench themselves from his hold. He even looks sinister. But maybe it was just a bad day.
:shocked: