CathInfo.com

Peter Wensierski ist ein exzellenter Journalist. Qualität zählt. Dazu ist er unabhängig, was ich von den anderen deutschen Kirchenreportern - vielleicht mit Ausnahme von Matthias Drobinski - so nicht behaupten würde. Ein unabhängiger, kluger Kopf, dabei korrekt in seinen Methoden - sicher in vielem anderer Meinung als ich. Besser als ein törichter Claqueur. Freund/ Feind-Denken bringt nichts, am wenigsten bei Medienleuten.
Peter Wensierski is an excellent journalist. Quality counts. To do this, he is independent, what I maybe so would say of the other German church reporters - with the exception of Matthias Drobinski-. An independent, clever head correctly in his methods - certainly much disagree as I. Better than a foolish claque. Friend / enemy thinking brings nothing, at least with media people.

Maximilian Krah Jungs, beim besten Willen, ohne Wensierski und seine Fairness wäre die Piusbruderschaft im Februar/ März 2009 als Bande von Antisemiten statt als konservative katholische Bewegung, die leider ein paar Idioten in ihren Reihen hat, gesehen worden - und damit erledigt gewesen. Nahezu jede Gruppe, deren Anliegen jenseits des katholischen Mainstreams ist, schwört auf den Mann; etwa das (konservative) Netzwerk katholischer Priester. Sicher auch linke Grüppchen. Ihr urteilt hier beide etwas flott, und obendrein auch noch falsch und ungerecht. Ich schätze Peter Wensierski als Mensch und Journalisten, sein Glaube zeigt sich etwa an seiner Verehrung des Turiner Grabtuchs. Er hat als SPIEGEL- und ARD-Reporter in den 1980er Jahren in der "DDR" offen gegen die Kommunisten geschrieben, ist bis heute ein Stasi-Aufklärer und Freund der alten Bürgerrechtler. Ein Mann mit Prinzipien und Charakter. Ich teile seine Ansichten in vielem nicht, aber wir schätzen uns genau deshalb, weil wir Überzeugungen haben. Wir brauchen nicht Freunde, die uns nach dem Munde reden, sondern starke Personen, die uns auch einmal das sagen, was uns schmerzt - selbst, wenn es nicht immer stimmt.


Guys, with the best will, without Wensierski and its fairness would be the Pius brotherhood in February / March 2009 as a gang of αnтι-ѕємιтєs, rather than as a conservative Catholic movement which has unfortunately a few idiots in their ranks, been - seen and thus been done. Almost any group whose Anliegen beyond the Catholic mainstream, swears by the man; as the (conservative) network of Catholic priest. Certainly the group left. Your judges here both somewhat quickly, and on top of that also still wrong and unjust. I guess Peter Wensierski as people and journalists, his faith shows some of his admiration of the Turin shroud. He has written as SPIEGEL-and ARD-reporter in the 1980s in the "GDR" openly against the Communists, is a friend of the old civil rights activist and Stasi reconnaissance until today. A man with principles and character. I do not share his views in many respects, but we appreciate us precisely because we have beliefs. We need not friends who talk to the mouth, but strong who even say us what ails us - even if it is not always true.

Und nochmal: Ohne SPIEGEL/ Wensierski hätte 2009 Williamson die FSSPX mit in den Abgrund gerissen. Damals war did FSSPX eben transparent, und die Medien haben das transportiert. Du hättest es damals alles vor die Hunde gehen lassen. Man sollte manchmal die Demut aufbringen, die Wirklichkeit auch dann anzuerkennen, wenn sie dem eigenen Denken widerspricht.

And again: without mirror / Wensierski Williamson would have swept 2009 the SSPX in the abyss. At that time did SSPX was very transparent, and the media have transported the. You could leave it at that time everything to the dogs. You should sometimes muster the humility to recognize the reality even if it is contrary to the own thinking

Dumb Ox posted this on IA previously.It was then posted here on Cath Info by me.

Quote

Fact 1.
The following words were written by Peter Wensierski:
"The letter makes clear that conflicting positions on Vatican II is 'not decisive' for the future of the Catholic Church. In short, the Society of St. Pius X is no longer demanding that the Vatican II reforms be repealed".

Fact 2.
Peter Wensierski is a friend and close collaborator of Fr. Pfluger and The Crow.

Fact 3.
Bishop Fellay has welcomed and encouraged the close collaboration between Wensierski, Fr. Pfluger and "He who shall remain nameless".

Fact 4.
The level of collaboration and trust between the powers-that-be at Menzingen and Peter Wensierski extends to the level of providing to him the content of private communication between Bishop Williamson and Menzingen for Wensierski to make use of in his journalism.

Fact 5.
It was to Wensierski that the powers-that-be at Menzingen described Bishop Williamson in terms of being "a first class provocateur" who "has always had strange ideas", someone who "exaggerates", someone who "is not a scholar", someone who is "a ticking time bomb", someone likened to "uranium", someone who "doesn't study the docuмents", someone with "Parkinson's Disease", and so on.

Fact 6.
In contrast Fr. Pfluger describes Wensierski as someone who is "honest and upright" and who is "most helpful for the Society".

I am reluctantly forced to conclude that Wensierski has indeed been informed of the content of Bishop Fellay's response to NewChurch and that Wensierski is merely acting in his capacity of being "most helpful for the Society".