Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx  (Read 637 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cosmas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 301
  • Reputation: +194/-85
  • Gender: Male
Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
« on: May 13, 2019, 10:41:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Father Celier distributes the books of the editions of Opus Dei The modernist infiltration of the editions of the FSSPX in France The photo of Castrillon-Hoyos, the abandonment of the titles of saints, etc. We return to a catalog Clovis Clovis Editions led by Father Celier. We note that in this catalog No. 62, Father Celier distributes works of the Laurier editions, editions belonging to Opus Dei, this conciliar organization, strongly questioned by various studies. The FSSPX, under the leadership of Father Celier, presented as a "historical figure" of the movement by the Albin-Michel, in a book to be published on March 12, is thus already, in fact, becoming a relay dissemination of a conciliar institution particularly active in the so-called conservative high spheres of the false conciliar Church. 

    Let us recall, in particular, a study by Arnaud de Lassus1: Arnaud de Lassus: Opus Dei, Texts and Documents, Family and School Action, 1992. Bénédicte and Patrice Des Mazery, who worked with Arnaud de Lassus, denounce this conciliar organization in: Opus Dei: a Church at the heart of the Church ", Flammarion, 2005. 

    Siege of Opus Dei 1 (photo of Opus Dei headquarters)

    We recognize this work, but we recall our deep divergence with Arnaud de Lassus on the question of the Universal Ordinary Magisterium ( SOFT). Having never received any reply from him to the objections we have addressed to his study, we will now come back to it publicly. 

    Who and Why, since the death of Archbishop Lefebvre in 1991, has diverted the supernatural purpose of the OPERATION-SURVIE of the saints of 1988, to assign to the FSSPX this FALSE priority objective of the "re-conciliation" with conciliar Rome ( in fact the "re-conciliarization" of the SSPX)? 

    Who has, since 2000, PROMOTED, and Why, the FALSE PRIOR to the authorization of the Mass of Saint Pius V? 

    Why was not the TRUE question of the re-establishment of the TRUE Priesthood of TRUE priests ordained by VALIDLY bishops, according to the VALID rite of Holy Orders? Who has come, and WHY, the false precept of lifting the "excommunications"? Why was there not the TRUE question of the abrogation of the 1968 Pontificalis Romani INVALIDE and the restoration of the true rite of the pre-1968 VALID episcopal consecration? 

    What would be the use, indeed, of having the TRUE rite of the Mass say by FALSE priests? Could it be then that after having forced REAL priests to say a FALSE mass, we now want to have the Mass of the TRUE RITE told by FALSE priests? Would we want to "reconcile" the REAL priests who still say REAL Mass with a clergy as INVALID as the FAUX CLERGE ANGLICAN? [the false Anglican clergy]

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2926
    • Reputation: +1617/-955
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #1 on: May 13, 2019, 11:13:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Looks like a google translation from French. It is not understandable in English.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24


    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 301
    • Reputation: +194/-85
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #2 on: May 13, 2019, 01:14:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Chronology of the publication and circulation of the Masonic program book within the District of France of the SSPX for two years with the total support and active participation of Father de Cacqueray
     
    Table of contents
     
    1.       The publication on March 12, 2007, of the joining program book by Father Celier, edited by and with a foreword of Jean-Luc Maxence, a not yet acknowledged freemason of the G∴L∴F∴... 7 
    2.       The first publicity campaign (May-June 2007) of Father Celier in 12 priories of the District of France to distribute his program book "Benedict XVI and the traditionalists", edited and prefaced by the freemason of the G∴L∴F∴... 10 
    3.       On July 7, 2007, Benedict XVI published the Motu Proprio. Four months before the joining program book of Father Celier has appeared. This release of the Motu is framed by the two campaigns of Father Celier in the priories, forhis program book edited by and with a foreword of a follower of theG∴L∴F∴... 15 
    4.       On October 5, 2007, Bishop Fellay’s nomination of Father Celier (edited by and with a foreword of a F∴M∴) is revealed in the theological commission responsible for the preparation of the "discussions" with Rome.17 
    5.       The second publicity campaign (October-December 2007) of Father Celier in 9 priories of the District of France to distribute his program book "Benedict XVI and the traditionalists", edited by and with a foreword of a freemason of the G∴L∴F∴... 18 
    6.       On the 1st  of December, 2007, a university circle violently attacks Father Celier’s philosophical work ("the mortal god"), for being an "initiatory guide to apostasy"Erreur ! Signet non défini. 
    7.       In March 2008, the hidden, but unmasked campaign of Father Celier to spread a second document about the joining among the clergy of the SSPX   19 
    8.       From June to August 2008, Father Celier, helped by Father Lorans, with insolence, and as if he has nothing to fear, hushes up the rebellion of Bishop Fellay and the bishops of the Fraternity (SSPX) against the ultimatum urged by Rome at the beginning June 2008  19 
    9.       In October 2008, Jean-Luc Maxence, editor of Father Celier, reveals his affiliation "since decades" to theGrande∴ Loge∴ de France∴ (Grand Lodge of France)24 
    10.    On the 1st of February 2009, Emmanuel Ratier passes on the information about Jean-Luc Maxence’s Masonic∴ affiliation in the Faits & Documents magazine25 
    11.    In March 2009, the magazine of the Dominican Fathers of Avrillé (Sel de la Terre) tells about the Masonic∴ affiliation of Jean-Luc Maxence  26 
    12.    May 10 2009, in his lecture to the IUSPX on subversion, Father Chautard, first curate of the Church of St. Nicolas du Chardonnet, makes the Masonic∴ affiliation of Jean-Luc Maxence known27 
    13.    In June 2009, the parish bulletin of the Church of St. Nicolas du Chardonnet, ("Le Chardonnet") makes the Masonic∴ affiliation of Jean-Luc Maxence known27 
    14.    In July 2009VM establishes the link between the program book of Father Celier and the Masonic∴ affiliation of Jean-Luc Maxence to the G∴L∴F∴... 28 
    15.    By the end of August 2009, although directly incriminated and finding his reputation damaged by the scandal, Bishop Fellay insists on supporting the Fathers Celier and De Cacqueray and the Masonic∴ political exposition in the program book "Benedict XVI and the traditionalists" Erreur ! Signet non défini. 
     

    Online Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 17589
    • Reputation: +9865/-4293
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #3 on: May 13, 2019, 01:17:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Looks like a google translation from French. It is not understandable in English.

    Agreed.  I can't make heads or tails out of this.

    Online Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5928
    • Reputation: +3266/-189
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #4 on: May 13, 2019, 04:36:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Cosmos, where are the links/references  to these writings? Certainly, the first is unintelligible and the second I didn't even look at.


    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 301
    • Reputation: +194/-85
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #5 on: May 13, 2019, 04:40:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • NADIR CLICK ON THE SENTENCES BETWEEN THE HEAVY INK, THEY WILL OPEN UP.

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 301
    • Reputation: +194/-85
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #6 on: May 13, 2019, 04:52:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The website this comes from is "virgo_maria.org "  Fr. Schoonbroodt put it together. He was a close friend of Archbishop Lefevre he tried to help the Archbishop's family after the Archbishop died to produce writings and sermons I think audio's also of the Archbishop that the family had in their possession to share with the world. When Bishop Fellay found out what they were going to do he SUED Fr. Schoonbroodt and the Archbishop's family to keep them from the public. B. Fellay's claim was they were SSPX Property. Evidently to me this says alot, What might have been in those sermons might definitely reverse the path the SSPX is on now.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2926
    • Reputation: +1617/-955
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Perhaps Opus Dei is the Hidden Hand behind Neosspx
    « Reply #7 on: May 13, 2019, 06:51:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Chronology of the publication and circulation of the Masonic program book within the District of France of the SSPX for two years with the total support and active participation of Father de Cacqueray


    15.    By the end of August 2009, although directly incriminated and finding his reputation damaged by the scandal, Bishop Fellay insists on supporting the Fathers Celier and De Cacqueray and the Masonic∴ political exposition in the program book "Benedict XVI and the traditionalists" Erreur ! Signet non défini.
     
    That is the bottom line: "although directly incriminated and finding his reputation damaged by the scandal, Bishop Fellay insists on supporting the Fathers Celier and De Cacqueray and the Masonic∴ political exposition in the program" 

    There's no money in being a traditionalist today, and the hireling is there for the money. 

    "But the hireling and he that is not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming and leaveth the sheep and flieth: and the wolf casteth and scattereth the sheep, And the hireling flieth, because he is a hireling: and he hath no care for the sheep" (John 10)
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16