Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: PALMAR SPEAKS VOLUMES  (Read 1042 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Infirmus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 104
  • Reputation: +35/-166
  • Gender: Male
PALMAR SPEAKS VOLUMES
« on: Yesterday at 12:35:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
    • Was Thuc blindfolded and spun around before he went to Palmar? You just get dizzy looking at what he started there.
    It even shows he was not sede by making a 180 after being excommunicated.
    Logged

    Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 387
    • Reputation: +125/-329
    • Gender: Male
    Re: PALMAR SPEAKS VOLUMES
    « Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 02:12:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • He consecrated the future Pope! Have some respect!
    Tuh!
    Logged

    Offline Romulus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 521
    • Reputation: +317/-61
    • Gender: Male
    Re: PALMAR SPEAKS VOLUMES
    « Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 08:37:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • A lot of people forget that it was an SSPX priest who was a professor at Econe and taught Canon Law that convinced +Thuc of the legitimatacy of Palmar.
    Logged

    Offline Infirmus

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 104
    • Reputation: +35/-166
    • Gender: Male
    Re: PALMAR SPEAKS VOLUMES
    « Reply #3 on: Today at 12:28:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Romulus on Yesterday at 08:37:22 PM
    A lot of people forget that it was an SSPX priest who was a professor at Econe and taught Canon Law that convinced +Thuc of the legitimatacy of Palmar.
    So........what are you trying to say, the SSPX was bad back then?
    Logged

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12893
    • Reputation: +8167/-2523
    • Gender: Male
    Re: PALMAR SPEAKS VOLUMES
    « Reply #4 on: Today at 12:40:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Infirmus on Today at 12:28:06 PM
    So........what are you trying to say, the SSPX was bad back then?
    One priest does not speak for the entire sspx.
    Logged
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »