Author Topic: Pakman Show Interviews GaJєωski (Read 16141 times)

Croixalist · « **on:** June 15, 2016, 11:51:02 AM »

So Eric scores an interview with an Argentinian Jєω/LGBT supporter David Pakman:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/AEvU9LxphW0[/youtube]

The same obliviousness as usual but this time he clearly neglected to do his homework on his interviewer's background. Unless of course it was his plan all along to humiliate himself and everything he stands for. If that was the case: mission accomplished!

Fr. Kramer's name dropped again. So far, Eric is the single biggest reason I'm suspicious of this character. He'll waste time with a fish-slapper but he can't reel in this looney tune? Fr. Paul Kramer, if you're reading this, you need to publically condemn his nonsense and disabuse him of these wild notions. For that matter I hope Fr. Voigt does too.

9:15 for Eric's admission of divine appointment.

mw2016 · « **Reply #1 on:** June 15, 2016, 02:45:51 PM »

I think the website ate my post...

Croixalist, am I missing something? What is interesting about this??

Nick · « **Reply #2 on:** June 16, 2016, 07:03:36 PM »

"9:15 for Eric's admission of divine appointment"

mw2016, it is relevant due to the ongoing malign influence that this nutcase continues to exercise within the Resistance groups.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #3 on:** June 16, 2016, 07:32:58 PM »

From what I understand, the self appointed "prophet" feels the need to pay for hits on his website to make him seem more popular.

Matthew · « **Reply #4 on:** June 16, 2016, 07:39:04 PM »

Quote from: Recusant Sede

From what I understand, the self appointed "prophet" feels the need to pay for hits on his website to make him seem more popular.

Exactly.

Pays for fake hits for fake popularity -->>
Gets more noteworthy priests to interview with him -->>
Gets more actual traffic -->>
Gets donations from a percent of that real traffic -->>
Uses the donations to buy more fake hits/popularity
-->> back to step one.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

A brilliant, vicious cycle of con-artistry and deception.

mw2016 · « **Reply #5 on:** June 16, 2016, 07:46:39 PM »

Quote from: Nick

"9:15 for Eric's admission of divine appointment"

mw2016, it is relevant due to the ongoing malign influence that this nutcase continues to exercise within the Resistance groups.

Please explain, as I am unfamiliar with him. Thanks.

I just didn't think there was anything strange in what he said, i.e. he was talking about Fatima & Chastisement to an obviously secular, unbeliever host. What was the scandal??

Matthew · « **Reply #6 on:** June 16, 2016, 07:47:00 PM »

I say about Eric what I've said about Pablo.

We don't need him.

Yes, Pablo might occasionally do some good. But for every penny of work he donates, he takes a dollar from the organization for his own benefit. But whatever work Pablo does, many dozens of others would happily do if Pablo weren't there, and they wouldn't bring along all the baggage/downsides to the organization that Pablo brings.

The same with Eric. For every bit of spreading useful information he does, he also does lots of harm to the Traditional Movement in general with his boasting, in-fighting, self-aggrandizement, and embarrassing the Traditional Movement with his lunacy. And what little "work" he actually does is also done by literally DOZENS of other websites and blogs, only without all the baggage and downsides that Eric brings to the table.

Vatican II might repeat some Catholic truths as well. But it must be thrown out nevertheless, because A) it offers nothing new that we can't get elsewhere, and B) it comes with so much ambiguity and error.

You don't keep a glass of arsenic-laced water, because "99% of it is good water". If it is tainted with arsenic, you throw it out.

Likewise, both Pablo and Eric might have a few good points (after all, "pure evil" is impossible), nevertheless they are both not worth the trouble and expense. Let them both give up their respective Apostolates of Self, and get real jobs!

The world of Tradition would benefit immensely if they did.

mw2016 · « **Reply #7 on:** June 16, 2016, 07:50:36 PM »

Quote from: mw2016

Quote from: Nick

"9:15 for Eric's admission of divine appointment"

mw2016, it is relevant due to the ongoing malign influence that this nutcase continues to exercise within the Resistance groups.

Please explain, as I am unfamiliar with him. Thanks.

I just didn't think there was anything strange in what he said, i.e. he was talking about Fatima & Chastisement to an obviously secular, unbeliever host. What was the scandal??

Nevermind. I googled and am reading now. Thanks.

http://www.SchismError.com/catholicchurch/tradcatknight-eric-gaJєωski-fraud-exposed/#.V2NI8rsrLbg

Nick · « **Reply #8 on:** June 16, 2016, 08:05:58 PM »

It's good that you're doing your own research , but even if you didn't ;
Surely what he said for the next minute after this point should be ringing some very loud alarm bells.

"9:15 for Eric's admission of divine appointment"
:judge:

hollingsworth · « **Reply #9 on:** June 16, 2016, 08:18:15 PM »

So, Eric and Pablo mentioned repeatedly in the same breath. Don't Eric and Fr. VOIGT have a fairly close relationship these days? And doesn't Mathew endorse the ministry of Fr. V, at least to some extent? Just wondering how this all works out in Matthew's mind.

wallflower · « **Reply #10 on:** June 16, 2016, 08:37:44 PM »

Well, props to the interviewer for keeping a straight face. He's quite a talented actor.

mw2016 · « **Reply #11 on:** June 16, 2016, 08:58:24 PM »

Quote from: Nick

It's good that you're doing your own research , but even if you didn't ;
Surely what he said for the next minute after this point should be ringing some very loud alarm bells.

"9:15 for Eric's admission of divine appointment"
:judge:

I heard it. I would not have described it that way, that's a stretch.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #12 on:** June 16, 2016, 10:04:30 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: Recusant Sede
From what I understand, the self appointed "prophet" feels the need to pay for hits on his website to make him seem more popular.

Exactly.

Pays for fake hits for fake popularity -->>
Gets more noteworthy priests to interview with him -->>
Gets more actual traffic -->>
Gets donations from a percent of that real traffic -->>
Uses the donations to buy more fake hits/popularity
-->> back to step one.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

A brilliant, vicious cycle of con-artistry and deception.

He must believe that God has appointed him to purchase fake hits to spread this message!

Matthew · « **Reply #13 on:** June 16, 2016, 10:53:22 PM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

So, Eric and Pablo mentioned repeatedly in the same breath. Don't Eric and Fr. VOIGT have a fairly close relationship these days? And doesn't Mathew endorse the ministry of Fr. V, at least to some extent? Just wondering how this all works out in Matthew's mind.

1. I just compared them under this ONE small aspect: is it worth putting up with their "crap" for what they provide the Traditional world? In both cases, I'd say "no". We can get what Eric provides in countless other places, and we can get what Pablo provides in many other places. That is the ONLY way I wish to compare the two. They are worlds apart in just about every other metric.

So the rest of your argument falls apart, but nevertheless, I will continue --

2. Even if I *were* saying that Eric was bad, I still don't follow the simplistic, Fr. Pfeiffer school of "guilt by association to an absurd degree".

Eric GaJєωski is a deceptive con artist with a serious self-esteem/pride problem. That doesn't mean that everyone he associates with is automatically evil. Even Eric himself isn't that evil. He has some major faults, which unfortunately cut to the root of what would be a worthy apostolate.

I mean, what good is an informative website when you throw in some delusions of grandeur, a bit of megalomania, and a deceptive cloud of "fake followers" to give a false aura of importance? What good is a conspiracy "truther" website which itself is founded on lies -- and whose very life-blood is lies?

Fr. Voigt is a good priest. But good people can be fooled by con men. It's because "to the pure, all things are pure". Honest people like Fr. Voigt have a hard time thinking that anyone -- at least any Traditional Catholic -- would actually go and be dishonest. Besides, Fr. Voigt could just be focusing on the positive, believing it outweighs the lies Eric relies on for his claims of importance.

But people like myself, Croixalist and others can't get past the lies. Especially when the mission statement of the website is supposed to be getting the "truth" out!

Truth begins at home, k?

In addition, con artists like Eric GaJєωski only show their true colors to lesser laymen like us, not priests (who they need for various reasons, including "to give any level of credibility to his operation").

Does that answer your question?

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #14 on:** June 16, 2016, 11:30:52 PM »

When I see Eric GaJєωski talking, now I am thinking this:

How does he justify using falsified popularity as something that God has approved for Eric's use in spreading his material? Why would God expect his 'prophet' to falsify his audience numbers to appear more popular than he really is? Has there ever been a saint in the history of the church who had to resort to falsifying his own popularity? The most remarkable saints shunned popularity, and certainly had no portion with falsehood.

When I think about that question, everything he says appears to be less credible. When he says that so-and-so is asking him for answers, I wonder how he purchased the attention of the questioner.

When he says that Malachi Martin urged us to look for the red cross in the sky that would be caused by "Planet X" I wonder when he heard Martin say that. (I recall him saying to keep looking upward, in the sky, but I don't recall hearing him say to look for a red cross.)

.