For your consideration:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmvrdCpdnRU&feature=youtu.be


Viva Cristo Rey!


*

When the Faith comes back to the Pope
When the Faith comes back to the bishops
When the Faith comes back to the priests
When the Faith comes back to the Churches

...THIS is our vindication!



Archbishop Lefebvre made it very clear: we cannot serve both God and mammon.


Rome is in apostacy. I am not speaking empty words. They have left the Faith.
It is certain. It is certain. It is certain. (He was quoting ABL.)


If you think that +Fellay's softening against the errors of Vatican II is not any
problem, just start listening at minute 28.


Modernism likes to change its labels. Well, we can change our labels, too! It used
to be the unclean spirit of Vatican II, now it's the unclean spirit of Summorum
Pontificuм, but it's still the same unclean spirit. Labels can change, but some
things never change.


Benedict XVI has visited the ѕуηαgσgυє every year for 7 years, so far. John
Paul II only visited the ѕуηαgσgυє twice in 28 years as pope.


People are telling us we are saying stay away from the Church: "You're saying
we have to wait till they're all perfect saints, until they're all ready to be
canonized, and we go back." The answer is no...

...We always maintain contact with them, 300 priests, 25 bishops: in order to speak
to them about conversion to Tradition! Not about how wonderful their life is inside
their Modernist, Conciliar church. Often times we walk the streets and speak with
Hindus, we speak with Muslims, we speak with Protestants ... our purpose is to
convert them.

The attacks of the devil are our means to glory. St. Paul holds a sword because it
was used to chop off his head.

In this sermon Fr. Pfeiffer says he has talked to 300 Novus Ordo priests and 25 bishops and is friends with some and even drinks with them.  He says he is trying to bring the truth to them.  Yet at the same time he expresses fear of OTHERS getting too close with the modernists and becoming watered down.  Isn't he afraid for himself?  How can he be sure that he won't get infected with modernism and "losing the faith slowly" by this close contact?  Why is it not ok for Bishop Fellay and his experts to talk to the modernists in Rome, while at the same time it is ok for Fr. Pfeiffer to talk to modernists all by himself elsewhere?

because he is drawing towards TRUTH...... not joining up with them!

And not putting himself under their control.

In this sermon Fr. Pfeiffer says he has talked to 300 Novus Ordo priests and 25 bishops and is friends with some and even drinks with them.  He says he is trying to bring the truth to them.  Yet at the same time he expresses fear of OTHERS getting too close with the modernists and becoming watered down.  Isn't he afraid for himself?  How can he be sure that he won't get infected with modernism and "losing the faith slowly" by this close contact?  Why is it not ok for Bishop Fellay and his experts to talk to the modernists in Rome, while at the same time it is ok for Fr. Pfeiffer to talk to modernists all by himself elsewhere?

A simple demonstration of fact answers your question.

Bishop Fellay is now using the lanquage and speaking as a modernist speaks.
Father Pfeiffer is not.

Bishop Fellay's experts who conducted the discussions advised him on a course of action and he ignored their counsel.

One man is spreading the truth, the other is trying to reach an accomodation.

That is why.