You are probably right. I was trying to see the situation from Fr. Chazal's POV; that is, if I'm understanding his POV properly. I may not be.

I do have some sympathy with Pilate and his situation. That might be a wrong attitude though.

He was certainly not as bad as the Jews, and some sources say that he later converted.

All the same, "washing our hands" is a sin that a lot of us have commited. It is a great temptation to walk away and pretend that only others are to blame for evils that are actually caused by our omissions. We all have a little of Pilate.

Not at all.  He recently said "we need to rethink what it means to say the Church is indefectible."  And rethink it he did!  He said indefectibility means there will always be a true remnant who are united to the hear of Jesus  It would be difficult to find a Protestant who disagrees, and it would be more difficult - actually, impossible - to find an informed Catholic who does agree because that is a completly heretical explanation of indefectibility. So, no, I do not share Bp. Schnieder's opinion on the crisis in the Church. 

Who do you share an opinion with, then? With Nishant Xavier? 

One example of what the conciliar church did away with...Note that this video was filmed in San Francisco.

Sure, but apart from the numbers (which looked good), something was rotten.  Vatican II didn't just come out of nowhere.  This proves once more that the outward appearances don't matter, the external actions don't matter ... as much as THE FAITH.  People's minds were thoroughly corrupted with Modernism by then.  From that crowd of, let's say it was, 300,000 ... how many actually believed that only Catholics can be saved?  You could probably count them on one hand.  So while they're praying their Rosaries, for them it's just a different expression, where some Buddhist on his "prayer beads" was also on the right path.

We're seeing the same thing with neo-SSPX.  Sure, their chapels are filled with lots of Catholics praying devoutly, living virtuous lives even ... but then how many of them are infected with the new Modernist ideas of the neo-SSPX and are having their faith rotted away gradually from with in.  I would liken it to a beautiful mansion of a home which is breathtaking ... but if you scratch beneath the surface, the insides are rotten with termite damage.

Just like probably 90% of the crowd depicted into that video very shortly became flaming Communist hippies, Modernists, charismatics, heretics (or just left the Church and stopped practicing) within just a few years of that, so too within a short time many of the SSPX will get sucked right back into Conciliarism when Bergoglio makes one of his next moves.

So, RacerX here is either Salza or Nishant again.  Took him a bit longer to de-cloak this time.

Just disclose, please.  The suspense is killing me.  

Actually, I could care less.

What you're implying is unreasonable is basic Catholic doctrine that can be found in any pre-Vatican II catechism.  The reason to you it might sound unreasonable is two-fold: 1) there is a gap in the knowledge of almost every so-called Traditional Catholic, and it consists of a lack of knowledge of the nature of the Catholic Church (what the Church is). 2) that gap has been filled in with 50 years worth of errors and heresies from Lefebvre and others, with the resuts that virtually every so-called Traditional Catholic now believes that the indefectible Church "morphed" into a New Church (i.e., defected), and that the "Catholic Church" now subsists in hundreds of heretical and schismatic sects, including the "chapels" (sects) of the SSPX, which are no more part of the Catholic Church than the hundres of Sedevacantist and "indepdndent" sects that split away from her. 

It has now gotten so bad that in a sermon that the SSPX proudly posted on its website, one of their heretical priest actually said that the Society has the prerogatives of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium (i.e., infallibility and indefectibility)!  And no one batted an eye.  But that shouldn't surprise anyone, since no one batted an eye when Lefebvre professed the heresy according to which the SSPX has the four marks!  Not only is that heresy proudly posted on their website to this day, and Bishops Tisseir - always faithfu to the heresies of Lefebvre - taught the same heresy numerous times. 

Another example of how bad it is was seen right here on cathino, when a "trad" posted Lefebvre's heretical teaching that bishops receive their jurisidcion "from the people" who "confer it on them" - not to criticize the heretical teaching, but as a way of explaining how bishops get their jurisdiction!  And no one objected to it.  BTW, Pius X explicity calls that heresy in his catechism (see #43).

Welcome to the New Church and New Religion of Archbishop Marcell Lefebvre.

Christ said "hear the Church;" he didn't say "hear Lefebvre." Therefore, no one will have any excuses on judgment day.

Given that you believe that the priests of the SSPX are heretics, and that Archbishop Lefebvre was a heretic, are you willing to say whom you admire in the conciliar church? There must be someone who has a perspective that is similar to your own. I could take a few guesses, but it might be better for you say it for yourself. 

What you're implying is unreasonable is basic Catholic doctrine that can be found in any pre-Vatican II catechism.  The reason to you it might sound unreasonable is two-fold: 1) there is a gap in the knowledge of almost every so-called Traditional Catholic, and it consists of a lack of knowledge of the nature of the Catholic Church (what the Church is). 2) that gap has been filled in with 50 years worth of errors and heresies from Lefebvre and others, with the resuts that virtually every so-called Traditional Catholic now believes that the indefectible Church "morphed" into a New Church (i.e., defected), and that the "Catholic Church" now subsists in hundreds of heretical and schismatic sects, including the "chapels" (sects) of the SSPX, which are no more part of the Catholic Church than the hundres of Sedevacantist and "indepdndent" sects that split away from her. 

It has now gotten so bad that in a sermon that the SSPX proudly posted on its website, one of their heretical priest actually said that the Society has the prerogatives of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium (i.e., infallibility and indefectibility)!  And no one batted an eye.  But that shouldn't surprise anyone, since no one batted an eye when Lefebvre professed the heresy according to which the SSPX has the four marks!  Not only is that heresy proudly posted on their website to this day, and Bishops Tisseir - always faithfu to the heresies of Lefebvre - taught the same heresy numerous times. 

Another example of how bad it is was seen right here on cathino, when a "trad" posted Lefebvre's heretical teaching that bishops receive their jurisidcion "from the people" who "confer it on them" - not to criticize the heretical teaching, but as a way of explaining how bishops get their jurisdiction!  And no one objected to it.  BTW, Pius X explicity calls that heresy in his catechism (see #43).

Welcome to the New Church and New Religion of Archbishop Marcell Lefebvre.

Christ said "hear the Church;" he didn't say "hear Lefebvre." Therefore, no one will have any excuses on judgment day.

For this post alone you should be banned.