Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Padre Chazal Speaks About Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais(SSPX)  (Read 17707 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Padre Chazal Speaks About Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais(SSPX)
« Reply #75 on: October 25, 2024, 10:56:58 AM »
If Rabbi RacerX were of good will, his position would likely and naturally align with the 2012 doctrinal declaration of Bishop Fellay and the Neo-SSPX. Although gravely mistaken, one could attribute this stance to ignorance—a misguided attempt to justify Bishop Fellay’s compromise and the Neo-SSPX’s new position. That could be sorted out over a conversation, however misguided.

But you, RacerX, show a stubbornness and depth of misunderstanding that places you even further removed from Catholic tradition. Stubborn rightly identified the type: either a Freemason or a dogmatic “Novus Ordo Conservative.” In reality, you embody the latter, a byproduct of the Alta Vendita blueprint—a Freemason in spirit, though perhaps not formally pledged in a blue lodge, but loyal to the Novus Ordo temples. This position, poisoned by modernist influence, is inherently anti-Catholic and reveals the true infiltration and intentions of the enemies of the Church.
Nailed it!

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Padre Chazal Speaks About Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais(SSPX)
« Reply #76 on: October 25, 2024, 11:05:27 AM »
Okay, so you didn't learn the deposit from the Bible or Tradition, or the Magisterium, but from:

1) Your grammar school and high school teachers.
2) Your college professors.
3) Sermons from priests (probably heretics) and from books.

Heres my question:  Where did your grammar school and high school teachers, your college professors, those who delivered the sermons and wrote the books learn it?  And were they infallible teachers?


I don't have any training in Zionism, but I learned the Catholic faith mainly from studying councils and other magisterial docuмents (in Denzingers for example) and by studying pre-Vatican II theology manuals.

In short, I learned the faith from an infallible teacher (the Magisterium) and from sources that the infallible teacher approved to be used in the training of priests.

In my younger years, my teachers used the Baltimore Catechism series. As I grew, my professors had us read the original Magisterial docuмents and analyses that were imprimatured (in a time when an imprimatur actually meant "Catholic").

Did you know that during the papacy of Pius XII the heresiarch Karl Rahner S.J. tampered with the English language Denzingers???  So, unless you can honestly (fat chance, liar!) claim study of the pre-Pius XII LATIN Denzingers, you have been mal-catechized.  So much for your claim of learning from unimpeachable sources. :laugh2: Karl Rahner!!! :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:


Offline Meg

Re: Padre Chazal Speaks About Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais(SSPX)
« Reply #77 on: October 25, 2024, 11:10:35 AM »
If Rabbi RacerX were of good will, his position would likely and naturally align with the 2012 doctrinal declaration of Bishop Fellay and the Neo-SSPX. Although gravely mistaken, one could attribute this stance to ignorance—a misguided attempt to justify Bishop Fellay’s compromise and the Neo-SSPX’s new position. That could be sorted out over a conversation, however misguided.

But you, RacerX, show a stubbornness and depth of misunderstanding that places you even further removed from Catholic tradition. Stubborn rightly identified the type: either a Freemason or a dogmatic “Novus Ordo Conservative.” In reality, you embody the latter, a byproduct of the Alta Vendita blueprint—a Freemason in spirit, though perhaps not formally pledged in a blue lodge, but loyal to the Novus Ordo temples. This position, poisoned by modernist influence, is inherently anti-Catholic and reveals the true infiltration and intentions of the enemies of the Church.

Well said. Even though he may not be an official member of a freemasonic lodge, Rabbi Racer embodies freemasonic principles, as Pope Francis does, and the conciliar church in general. The conciliar church has strived to do away with the Catholic Church, and replace it with the "church of man." Man-centered, instead of God-centered. It's all about "the people of God." A freemasonic principle.

Pope Francis wants especially to get rid of the Old Mass, and force conciliar Catholics to attend the horrid novus ordo. Francis has said that this is a goal. Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ wants tradition gone, as does rabbi racer here.

Offline Meg

Re: Padre Chazal Speaks About Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais(SSPX)
« Reply #78 on: October 25, 2024, 11:24:23 AM »
State the Freemason principle you believe I embody and then show where what I wrote confirms it.  Of course, we both know you won't do that, since you never back up any (false) accusation when you are asked to do so.  But remember, when you arrive at your particular judgment you will answer for every accusation you have made.  If you were wise, you would focus more on accusing ourself of your own sin, not only you sins of falsely accusing others, but all your other sins, including the biggy, which is schism.   

You hate tradition and traditionalists. You want us to follow a heretical pope. You want us to submit to the heretical dioceses in the conciliar anti-catholic church. You are an advocate of heresy. And no, I'm not going to detail everything I just wrote. That's how you try to manipulate everyone here. That's evil. Freemasons are manipulative. They excel at it, as you do. 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Padre Chazal Speaks About Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais(SSPX)
« Reply #79 on: October 25, 2024, 11:25:47 AM »
Stubborn rightly identified the type: either a Freemason or a dogmatic “Novus Ordo Conservative.”

Or both ... aka John Salza.  He's denied being Salza or Nishant, so perhaps it's Siscoe.  In either case, it's one of those guys' followers, proposing the same moronic definition of the Church as a mere material reality.  But indefectibility refers not to the mere material continuity, but to the inability to defect in its mission of preserving the faith.

By claiming that the Conciliar Church teaches no error and is the Cahtolic Church, the guy is both a heretic and a blasphemer.