Of ourse I do. All Freemasons, as well as those who publicly adhere to a "chapel" that is not part of their diocese, are exommunicated, provided the excommunication for Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is still in force (which I don't believe is the case). But if it is, I affirm it.
Do you affirm that all schismatics, even if they don't think they are schismatics, incur ipso facto excommunication?
What a word salad of ambiguity!
You affirm "…if…" is no affirmation at all. It is merely window-dressing.
Quote the Magisterium that states "adhering" to a non-diocesan chapel earns any kind of excommunication.
Even before the "Vatican 2" revolution and occupation of the Church, most religious orders had chapels that were non-diocesan. Your silly declaration "excommunicated" centuries of Jesuits, Dominicans, Franciscans, Redemptorists, and other orders who had their own non-diocesan chapels. Your foolish claim cuts a wide swath of "excommunications."