The pope is the actual visible head of the Church.  Christ is the true but invisible head, and he is the only head with respect to grace, but the pope is nevertheless the true visible head of the Church.  In fact, the Church teaches that the Pope and Christ constitute one head.  If you disobey a command of the pope, you disobey Christ, unless the command is sunful; and no pope since Vatican II has commanded anything sinful. 

If the Pope deviates from what Christ taught, I agree that we must not follow the pope on that point.  When has that happened?  Quote the specific papal teachings you are referring to, then quote the teaching of Jesus that you believe they contradict, and then explain why you believe the former contradicts the latter.

The Pope's job is to govern the Church and defend the deposit, and your job is to obey the pope in all things but sin, and not judge how he is doing his job.  The pope will answer to Christ for how he does his job, and you will answer for 1) how well you did your job, and 2) for all the times you publicly criticized the pope for how you think he is doing his.  And I can guarantee that on judgment day you will regret every single time you publicly criticized the pope, and wish you had focused instead on doing yours.

Buy remaining part of your diocese and obeying your bishop and the pope in all things that are not a sin.  And I bet you will never be commanded by either to do something sinful.

So, the tactic has been the same each time.  You open by attacking SVism as schismatic/heretical, trying to get the various R&R types to join with you, but then your actual positions begin to manifest themselves as you condemn all Traditonal Catholics as heretics and schismatics.

If you believe that the Conciliar Dumpster Fire is the Holy Catholic Church and the Bergogolio is one of the successors of St. Peter in whom was never found even the stain of error (Vatican I), then you're a heretic and schismatic for asserting the defection of the Church.

St. Pius X, had he been timewarped forward to today, to behold this cloaca called the Conciliar Church would have reckoned it as having the notes of some bizarre Protestant sect and not those of the Holy Catholic Church.

You blaspheme by claiming that this filthy excrement known as the Vatican II Conciliar Church is in fact the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.  You point to this vile whore (the Whore of Babylon in Revelation) and try to pretend that it's the Spotless Bride of Christ.  It's the false "ape" Church of the end times apostasy, and you are a partisan of it and are yourself Antichrist.

Begone, Satan.

Nope.

I never said obedince to the Pope rather than Christ, but what you are advocating is obedience to Christ, rather than the Pope, which is a grevious error.

Christ and the Pope constitute one head of the Church.  Christ rules the Church though his visible head, and disobeying the visible head, is disobdience to Christ, unless the particualar command of the Pope is itself contrary to human or divine law (I'm still waiting for you to provide examples of the latter.  So far, its crickets.)  Here is how Pius XII explains it:


A consequence of Christ and the Pope constituting "only one head," is that those who separate from the Pope ipso facto separate themselves from Christ.  And it doesn't matter if the reason they separated from the Pope is because they were deceived by one of the countless specious arguments of the Sedvacantist heretics.  If one objectively separates from the pope, they objectively separate themselves from Christ (and his Church). And that reality is always manifest by their actual physical separation from the visible Church, which is what always happens when someone falls into Sedevacantism. They reject the Pope, and then immediately reject the Church.


Not instead, but because; and it's not because "I love" what he teaches, but because he is the vicar of Christ and visible head of the Church, thereby consituting one head with Christ, and because Christ commands that I obey him.

You are deceiving yourself if you think you are following Christ without following the pope, as Pius XII teaches


Those words of Pius XII apply to you.  But I'm sure you won't care.  After all, they were only spoken by the Pope, not by Christ, who alone you follow.

…The pope is the rule of faith because what he defines as de fide becomes an article of faith.…

But the Church teaches that one must submit and obey the Pope.  Do you accept that teaching of the Church and put it into practice?
The charism of infallibility prevents the pope from erring when he defines a doctrine, ex cathedra. Since the pope only acts as the rule of faith when he defines, ex cathedra, a pope will never "change the teaching of the Church" when he acts as the rue of faith.  You see, when you know the Catholic faith, and when you understand what the terms mean (e.g., rule of faith), not only does it prevents you from falling into many errors, but it enables you to refute the specious arguments of heretics.


No, do you?  For example, do you believe that the Pope and Christ constittute one head of the Church, and that they "walk in the path of dangerous error who believe that they can accept Christ as the Head of the Church, while not adhering loyally to His Vicar on earth" (Pius XII)?

What a word salad of ambiguity!

You affirm "…if…" is no affirmation at all. It is merely window-dressing.

Quote the Magisterium that states "adhering" to a non-diocesan chapel earns any kind of excommunication.

Even before the "Vatican 2" revolution and occupation of the Church, most religious orders had chapels that were non-diocesan. Your silly declaration "excommunicated" centuries of Jesuits, Dominicans, Franciscans, Redemptorists, and other orders who had their own non-diocesan chapels.  Your foolish claim cuts a wide swath of "excommunications."

I just check and the excommunication of Freemasons is still on the books, even though the new code doesn't explicitly mention them. It is implicit in the Code.  So, anyone who belongs to Freemasons, or a non-Catholic "chapel," is ipso facto excommunicated by the force of law.