Author Topic: Pablo threatens Admin again with Lawsuit (Read 7302 times)

Admin · « **on:** October 12, 2015, 10:22:42 AM »

Quote from: E-mail from Pablo

Upon the advice of counsel:

The purpose of this letter is to place you on notice that I, Paul Hernandez, neither authorize nor consent to either the express or implied use of my name, identification, photograph or likeness, nor the disclosure of any personal, financial, medical or employment information about me, nor that of my family, in any media or other publication. This includes, but is not limited to, publication via internet or other multimedia, or print, whether for personal, pastoral or professional use or distribution.

It is my expectation that you will adhere to your Catholic obligations and duties in all matters as it relates to me, and will reflect seriously on your recent and unfortunate slanderous campaign against my children, name and reputation.

Hoping that it will not be necessary, please be advised that if you should fail to abide by this notice I will consider all available legal remedies and damages, together with costs of suit.

Take every bit of my name off Cathinfo. Every speck.

Thank you for your attention to the above.

Please have your attorney of fact contact me at (602) 469-4469.

pablotheMexican

*

cathman7 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 12, 2015, 10:29:36 AM »

Does he have any real leg to stand on?

MrYeZe · « **Reply #2 on:** October 12, 2015, 10:30:16 AM »

Wow, what a moron.

Admin · « **Reply #3 on:** October 12, 2015, 10:32:43 AM »

1. Great -- how do all those supporters of Boston, KY feel about their money being used to attack the admin of CathInfo, who has his faults, I'll agree -- but taking a Traditional Catholic in good standing before the pagan courts for something like this? Couldn't the money be better used elsewhere?

2. Pablo, with his "brand", boasting, need for fame/attention, accepting -- nay, usurping -- a position of leadership in Boston, KY, posting a public sermon yesterday on Youtube -- now he wants to be treated like a private man, with no one talking about him? Sorry, bub. You can't have it both ways. If you are a public man then discussing your PUBLIC and PROFESSIONAL ACTIONS, things that have a bearing on the organization you are involved with, is fair game. You being a public man is easy to prove -- the organization YOU CLAIM TO BE IN CHARGE OF is nationwide, with public Masses offered many times over the past few months. You put your name on everything!

3. Anything public can be publicly discussed by the public. Everything we post here is a good-faith discussion of OUR CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE or opinion of your actions. If anyone has posted something untrue, it wouldn't be my problem, since FORUMS are protected as avenues of free speech. If you have a problem with a particular fact being released, and you wanted to pursue legal action, you would have to find the individual poster and sue him.

4. CathInfo didn't shut down when Ignis Ardens shut down a few years ago (remember the neo-SSPX's call for a 40-day fast from forums?), we ignored Max Krah's threat, and we've been through this many times before. Fortunately for the Catholic world, I admire and look up to the Cristeros. They didn't back down, but fought for Christ the King. Through my weekly attendance at Mass, God gives me the grace to stand up to evil, and pursue all manner of good works.

Stubborn · « **Reply #4 on:** October 12, 2015, 12:20:08 PM »

Pretty much everything on CI about him can be found elsewhere on the internet - no?

He needs to go jump in a lake.

covet truth · « **Reply #5 on:** October 12, 2015, 12:29:06 PM »

Pablo is a bully! The only reason he gets away with it is that Fr. Pfeiffer backs him up. Without Father's support he is nothing. So who is to blame for the havoc being created continually in the resistance? It would be so easy to put a stop to it. The big question is WHY hasn't that happened?

Admin · « **Reply #6 on:** October 12, 2015, 01:18:30 PM »

He posted this threat letter to me on his youtube channel as well -- as well as a very similar one addressed to Fr. Voigt.

In the Fr. Voigt letter, he lies and slanders his good name. I don't recommend anyone read the filth.

Pablo must be cast out of Boston, KY -- but this might be the kind that requires prayer and fasting.

Croixalist · « **Reply #7 on:** October 12, 2015, 01:28:40 PM »

Good luck getting Pfr. Pfeiffer to fast!

Ok, that wasn't fair. I'm sure he could half-fast.

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #8 on:** October 12, 2015, 01:36:57 PM »

Quote from: Croixalist

Good luck getting Pfr. Pfeiffer to fast!

Ok, that wasn't fair. I'm sure he could half-fast.

The implosion of OLMC is really no laughing matter. And also, There is no reason to show such disdain and sinful insult towards any priest in this manner. Ever.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #9 on:** October 12, 2015, 02:00:48 PM »

Quote from: obscurus

Does he have any real leg to stand on?

No.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #10 on:** October 12, 2015, 02:01:51 PM »

Come on now, guys, please stop attacking his children !

JPaul · « **Reply #11 on:** October 12, 2015, 02:03:49 PM »

SSPX and the resistance so called..........law suits..............the apple has fallen next to the tree...........................

Croixalist · « **Reply #12 on:** October 12, 2015, 02:27:47 PM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Quote from: Croixalist
Good luck getting Pfr. Pfeiffer to fast!

Ok, that wasn't fair. I'm sure he could half-fast.

The implosion of OLMC is really no laughing matter. And also, There is no reason to show such disdain and sinful insult towards any priest in this manner. Ever.

It's not an insult, the man clearly has nothing to say about it, nor has he ever made it a major topic. It's not an insult, it's a legitimate criticism. You don't have to be a supermodel to be a priest, but morbid obesity is not okay. Call it a symptom of a much greater problem for him. Ignore it at your peril.

Now the chickens have come home to roost. Tragic for those who put all their eggs in his basket!

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #13 on:** October 12, 2015, 03:07:57 PM »

Quote from: Croixalist

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
Quote from: Croixalist
Good luck getting Pfr. Pfeiffer to fast!

Ok, that wasn't fair. I'm sure he could half-fast.

The implosion of OLMC is really no laughing matter. And also, There is no reason to show such disdain and sinful insult towards any priest in this manner. Ever.

It's not an insult, the man clearly has nothing to say about it, nor has he ever made it a major topic. It's not an insult, it's a legitimate criticism. You don't have to be a supermodel to be a priest, but morbid obesity is not okay. Call it a symptom of a much greater problem for him. Ignore it at your peril.

Now the chickens have come home to roost. Tragic for those who put all their eggs in his basket!

Both Saint Thomas Aquinas and G.K. Chesterton could be considered morbidly obese. This should not be a consideration.

Admin · « **Reply #14 on:** October 12, 2015, 03:15:49 PM »

Croixalist, that comment was really uncalled for. I distance myself from, and totally disapprove of, that comment.

Let's stay focused, charitable, and Catholic, shall we?

We don't want people to misunderstand, or think that "CathInfo" or "Matthew" hates Fr. Pfeiffer. Even though it was ONE PERSON named Croixalist, and just one of his comments at that.

Remember, one's enemies will seize on such "weak moments" and exploit them to the Nth degree -- getting countless mileage out of them -- even though they didn't come from me or "CathInfo" at all. It was just one aberrant comment.

But that's how some people operate. Not everyone looks into things deeply, makes proper distinctions, etc. Some people are too busy, others are just lazy, etc. But that's human nature. You have to be very careful to not give the wrong impression.

Heck, even if you ARE careful, some will still misunderstand you (whether on purpose, or on accident!) and that's bad enough.

But you can at least do your best in this regard.