Pablo Practiced omerta ? if so we must mail or call Fr. Pfeiffer and tell him to take an action or admits in public he's in grave danger.

Second post

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Fr-Pfeiffer-attempts-to-defuse-the-situation

Just to clear things up: Pablo wrote that text in the forum? what has his nickname? Or did he emailed to you?

I received it in an e-mail from Pablo, complete with his picture. I was either CC'd on the e-mail (because I was on the coordinator list), or it was to me personally. It might have been sent to all the coordinators; they can vouch for its authenticity.

Here is the e-mail in full:

Against my learned opinion, Father Pfeiffer felt sorry for you and placed you back as coordinator.

You have run your Chapel as a continuum of the Elitist SSPX; there are no Poor Souls that have been added to the Mass under your watch. Just more of your kind.

Some of us have been catechized to understand we must bring poor souls to Our Lord.

You absolutely knew the terms and conditions Holy Mother Church lays down that we all must follow. You took advantage of people's fear to make secret all within your grasp.

I don't care one tiny little rats behind what your opinion is of me.

I would like to add some good news to your depressing arrogance: If Father has someone pony up $ 40,000 for each of the next three years, he can hire a cook for the Seminary and have no further need for me.

Three years. Forty grand a year. Pocket change for you Trads.

I have slowly been making arrangements that my duties and responsibilities be taken over by others. I think this time I will be successful.

...

Your arrogance is life long, isn't it?

As I gave the command to place it on my sites, Padre was attending his Priestly duties in close proximity. He was aware a violation of protocol and procedure had occurred and trusted me to make it right.

I moved swiftly.

I had absolutely no concern for Those of Immaculate Virtue Trads.

Forty grand a year doesn't sound so bad now does it?

When I leave you all I will take a good shower, put on a new set of clothes, and burn the ones I wore while among you all.

I will then endeavor to protect my children and grandchildren from Trads first, then the Devil.

I don't hide from anyone; nor do I keep 'secrets' I do practice Omerta.

If so, I believe Fr. Pfeiffer should have expelled Pablo. How can you forgive someone for showing porn in a Seminary? How can you NOT expel this person?

again: for how long Pablo works/lives near Fr. Peiffer? Why Fr. Chazal didn't say anything about what's going on in the Seminary if that happens for more than a year?

If Pablo showed porn and admitted to practice omerta, shouldn't Fr. Chazal warn the public to stay away from there?

In any case all this may not be true, I don't know any of them personally. But many people say that Pablo showed porn, what I'd like to know if that's true.

If all things about Pablo are true, why people still attend Boston Chapel?

Pablo was on CathInfo for a while.

When I banned him, I deleted many of his posts, because I didn't want to add to his fame and earthly glory which he was obviously striving for.

This was back in 2012. I had people at my SSPX chapel that weren't involved in the Resistance, but they knew about a man named "Pablo". I knew I had to do something.

I realize now that it might be convenient to have many things posted by Pablo here, but what value would they really have? I control the forum, so people still wouldn't trust it. Morally, I know that he posted it here, so I can post it as FIRST HAND EVIDENCE because I was here when he posted it. It's like being in the room when he said it.

In the category of "FIRST HAND EVIDENCE" I have his admission that he was engaging in unlawful "lay exorcist" activities. He vouched for that Phoenix newspaper story about his activities.

Again, I ask the audience: why does Catholic doctrine forbid superstition and dabbling in the devil? There must be a danger associated with it. Pablo's imprudent involvement with the devil took place over a decade ago. Where did that behavior lead him? It's a good question.

See, if someone accused a random person of witchcraft, I'd say "Get outta here!" But I can't really say that when it's Pablo. We all know he's superstitious, he talked about "hand to hand combat with the devil" and admitted to imprudent "seeking after the devil" even though he claimed it was to fight him. And today, we know he doesn't attend Mass anymore. He also practices some Mafia behavior called "Omerta". Oh, and he seeks power and influence. Reports of showing pornography to a seminarian. See what I mean? It's not that unbelievable. The evidence really piles up, though I don't have a photo of Pablo casting a spell.

Let's just say there's good cause for suspicion. A prudent Catholic wouldn't get involved with that group, after the evidence presented above -- even if it's not enough to convict a person of witchcraft in a court of law.

We have certainty that Pablo is bad news. That's enough to avoid him. He doesn't need to be an actual wizard. He's an apostate with some kind of "spell" (metaphorical or actual) over Fr. Pfeiffer, and that's enough to avoid the whole group.

That is true

The article he brags about is about him right? The Pablo in the news is him , right?

If that's the case, why a non-Catholic is working in a Seminary? Or if he's a Catholic (Novus Ordo) why Fr Pfeiffer tell people to stay away from SSPX while he hangs out with a amateur person that deals with exorcism?  (I don't attend to SSPX mass and I don't like the Neo-SSPX)

Fr Pfeiffer has no authority to tell the people that attend his Mass anything if he's hanging out with a person like that. FR HEWKO as well! In fact I suspect both of them are guilty for not telling people that attend there that one of the workers is involved in such strange activities.

When I first watched Pr Pfeiffer I was amazed "Wow, a true Priest !" Now I came to understand that what's going on in the Novus Ordo is happening with people that call themselves "traditionalists". Novus Ordo priests hang out with marxists and even people who do black magic. I thought people who believe in the Catholic Church shouldn't do that; that's why Novus Ordo priests do that and Catholic priests don't.

Quote from: welffn

Plus: Why Fr. Chazal and Fr Hewko are covering this mess? They have the moral obligation to tell the truth, it does not matter whatever they may think, they have to say the truth. Period.

If they refuse to say the truth about what's going on in the Seminary, how can we be sure they will tell the truth about their lives? their beliefs?

Your comments really are all over the place and hard to keep up with, and it's not your English.  The few mistakes in English (like the use of the past tense auxiliary verb "did" combined with the simple past main verb in sentences) were easily understood by matthew and others.

But jumpíng around on all topics and saying things that have no correlation whatsover with the rest of what you wrote...

In this case you are asking why Fr. Chazal is covering (hiding) this mess.  Please inform yourself before making accusative comments about priests.  The entire forum has seen by now the video Fr. Chazal posted.  Don't add more confusion to this thing.

I'm not accusing Fr. Chazal, what I'm saying is that I didn't watch any video of Fr. Chazal (or letter) saying if he saw bad things at Fr. Pfeiffer Seminary.

If you could provide me a link I'd watch or read and then delete/retreat my position.

What I've said
"Why Fr. Chazal is hiding?"
This is a legitimate question because I could not find any information. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

You said "accusing PRIESTS"

Fact one: I didn't accuse
Fact two: There's no video or text from Fr. Hewko regarding the situation there. Thus even If was accusing two or more Priests regarding, at least in one Priest - which is Fr. Hewko I'd be right. But as I wasn't accusing, I have no obligation to retreat because I didn't do anything wrong.

Quote from: welffn

If you could provide me a link I'd watch or read and then delete/retreat my position.

What I've said
"Why Fr. Chazal is hiding?"
This is a legitimate question because I could not find any information. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Here is the video link:http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Fr-Chazals-Conference-on-Ambrose

I watched this two times, Fr. Chazal does not clear up the situation in the Seminary. He proves Ambrose is fake and they should watch out what they are doing.

I'm looking Fr. Chazal video or text regarding the situation there. He knows and have talked to Fr. Pfeiffer many times so he must know what's going on and tell us the absolute truth or at least the facts!