Pablo was on CathInfo for a while.
When I banned him, I deleted many of his posts, because I didn't want to add to his fame and earthly glory which he was obviously striving for.
This was back in 2012. I had people at my SSPX chapel that weren't involved in the Resistance, but they knew about a man named "Pablo". I knew I had to do something.
I realize now that it might be convenient to have many things posted by Pablo here, but what value would they really have? I control the forum, so people still wouldn't trust it. Morally, I know that he posted it here, so I can post it as FIRST HAND EVIDENCE because I was here when he posted it. It's like being in the room when he said it.
In the category of "FIRST HAND EVIDENCE" I have his admission that he was engaging in unlawful "lay exorcist" activities. He vouched for that Phoenix newspaper story about his activities.
Again, I ask the audience: why does Catholic doctrine forbid superstition and dabbling in the devil? There must be a danger associated with it. Pablo's imprudent involvement with the devil took place over a decade ago. Where did that behavior lead him? It's a good question.
See, if someone accused a random person of witchcraft, I'd say "Get outta here!" But I can't really say that when it's Pablo. We all know he's superstitious, he talked about "hand to hand combat with the devil" and admitted to imprudent "seeking after the devil" even though he claimed it was to fight him. And today, we know he doesn't attend Mass anymore. He also practices some Mafia behavior called "Omerta". Oh, and he seeks power and influence. Reports of showing pornography to a seminarian. See what I mean? It's not that unbelievable. The evidence really piles up, though I don't have a photo of Pablo casting a spell.
Let's just say there's good cause for suspicion. A prudent Catholic wouldn't get involved with that group, after the evidence presented above -- even if it's not enough to convict a person of witchcraft in a court of law.
We have certainty that Pablo is bad news. That's enough to avoid him. He doesn't need to be an actual wizard. He's an apostate with some kind of "spell" (metaphorical or actual) over Fr. Pfeiffer, and that's enough to avoid the whole group.