Author Topic: Pablo charity sermon taken down - get it here (Read 2441 times)

Matthew · « **on:** October 19, 2015, 06:24:18 PM »

That infamous "sermon" of Pablo on charity?

Download it here -- now!

Apparently it admitted too much and gave them too much of a black eye.

Matthew · « **Reply #1 on:** October 24, 2015, 06:16:53 PM »

I just looked at my website stats -- it's been download over 500 times so far...wow!

LucasL · « **Reply #2 on:** October 24, 2015, 07:14:33 PM »

Some good priests just can't accept the basic, they must look for trouble and put the seminarians in danger.

Let's not forget that one single man devastated Europe because he's false teaching (Luther). Let's not forget what happens when ones turn away from God.

Croixalist · « **Reply #3 on:** October 24, 2015, 07:18:19 PM »

Nice save! Let it be a permanent testimony to their dysfunction.

OHCA · « **Reply #4 on:** October 24, 2015, 11:27:55 PM »

Quote from: LucasL

Let's not forget that one single man devastated Europe because he's false teaching (Luther). Let's not forget what happens when ones turn away from God.

Seems like he had ego issues, too. Fr. Pfeiffer is perilously flirting with schism/heresy with this Ambrose drama. The combination of that and the wetback exorcist have me going beyond doubting his judgment and more seriously doubting his sanity. Say 5 years ago, an otherwise reputable independent R&R priest had dug up Ambrose for say confirmations--what would Fr. Pfeiffer had said?

Matthew · « **Reply #5 on:** October 25, 2015, 12:24:50 AM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: LucasL
Let's not forget that one single man devastated Europe because he's false teaching (Luther). Let's not forget what happens when ones turn away from God.

Seems like he had ego issues, too. Fr. Pfeiffer is perilously flirting with schism/heresy with this Ambrose drama. The combination of that and the wetback exorcist have me going beyond doubting his judgment and more seriously doubting his sanity. Say 5 years ago, an otherwise reputable independent R&R priest had dug up Ambrose for say confirmations--what would Fr. Pfeiffer had said?

Or what if a "competitor" or "enemy" did that today? (I mean, assuming they did it before Fr. Pfeiffer started this whole Ambrose thing.) I mean, he has his itchy trigger finger on the red-light button. Imagine if the SSPX had brought in a dubious Orthodox bishop! He would have been all over that with his down-to-earth Kentucky wit and rhetoric, and with all the zeal his choleric personality could muster.

As many people have pointed out though, the double-standards are quite glaring. Imagine if a priest like Fr. Zendejas was doing something dangerous like dealing with a con-man/Orthodox bishop, and going around saying "I'm still part of the SSPX, and Bishop Fellay is my superior." He'd have a field day with that. But Fr. Pfeiffer does both of these things, and that's supposed to be OK.

Meanwhile, Fr. Pfeiffer allows Mr. Moran to say "mass" at his chapel with no investigation at all. I'm talking about the first day he arrived at the compound -- any "investigation" that was (or wasn't) done was still in the future.

The truth, though, is obvious: the main element to get a "stamp of approval" from Fr. Pfeiffer is submission to Boston, KY as to a New Rome and acknowledgement of Fr. Pfeiffer as the universal superior.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #6 on:** October 25, 2015, 10:57:18 AM »

So where do people go from here? I am all but convinced that Fr. Pfeiffer is a nut, or worse even, a poor man's megalomaniac. Fr. Hewko is, at the very least, confused. "Bp. Ambrose" is a laughable phony. Pablo is....We all know what Pablo is. The so-called OLMC seminary is practically seminarian-less. The entire U.S. "Resistance" project is in utter shambles. Many of the faithful, who followed Fr. Pfeiffer's lead, here and in other parts of the world, are now rudderless, casting about here and there, and dragging their anchors.

What is more, Hillary Clinton may become the next president of the U.S. I'm ready for a new fantasy myself.

Meanwhile, folks go on as they can. Just like Bp. Williamson has said on several occasions: We're in for hard times ahead. Say 15 decades of the Rosary daily. Pray for the Consecration of Russia. Read the Poem of the Man God; and plant potatoes.
:tv-disturbed:

OHCA · « **Reply #7 on:** October 25, 2015, 11:46:58 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

So where do people go from here? I am all but convinced that Fr. Pfeiffer is a nut, or worse even, a poor man's megalomaniac. Fr. Hewko is, at the very least, confused. "Bp. Ambrose" is a laughable phony. Pablo is....We all know what Pablo is. The so-called OLMC seminary is practically seminarian-less. The entire U.S. "Resistance" project is in utter shambles. Many of the faithful, who followed Fr. Pfeiffer's lead, here and in other parts of the world, are now rudderless, casting about here and there, and dragging their anchors.

What is more, Hillary Clinton may become the next president of the U.S. I'm ready for a new fantasy myself.

Meanwhile, folks go on as they can. Just like Bp. Williamson has said on several occasions: We're in for hard times ahead. Say 15 decades of the Rosary daily. Pray for the Consecration of Russia. Read the Poem of the Man God; and plant potatoes.
:tv-disturbed:

Very disheartening to see obvious commonsense down-thumbed.

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #8 on:** October 25, 2015, 11:54:13 AM »

The seminary has at least 8 seminarians.

OHCA · « **Reply #9 on:** October 25, 2015, 01:12:31 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

The seminary has at least 8 seminarians.

A recent influx who didn't know what they were getting into and are contemplating their exit? In fact, as important as how many are there, how many have left?

Wonder how many seminarians David Bawden has? Wonder if Father Pfeiffer would be sufficiently impressed with his lineage to have Bawden consecrate him?

OHCA · « **Reply #10 on:** October 25, 2015, 01:17:24 PM »

I'm not convinced that either Bawden or Ambrose are priests of bishops. But in danger of death, I would roll the dice on Bawden. That just occurred to me and is absolutely the choice I would make if my soul depended on it in such a nightmarish fate. Even more emphatically, if I had to choose between a priest ordained by one or the other, I would go with a Bawden priest.

MariaAngelaGrow · « **Reply #11 on:** October 25, 2015, 05:40:29 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: LucasL
Let's not forget that one single man devastated Europe because he's false teaching (Luther). Let's not forget what happens when ones turn away from God.

Seems like he had ego issues, too. Fr. Pfeiffer is perilously flirting with schism/heresy with this Ambrose drama. The combination of that and the wetback exorcist have me going beyond doubting his judgment and more seriously doubting his sanity. Say 5 years ago, an otherwise reputable independent R&R priest had dug up Ambrose for say confirmations--what would Fr. Pfeiffer had said?

I know that Pablo has caused many people pain and loss. Whatever he has done, it is NOT because he is Mexican-American. In Pablo runs the same "blood" as those who made the long pilgrimages to Santiago de Compostela at great cost in past times. The same heritage as Ferdinand and Isabella who saved the Iberian peninsula from the Moors. The same love of Christo Rey as the Cristeros who proudly and eagerly shed that same blood for their King. His heritage is not Pablo's problem. And it is not charitable to blame anything that has happened on Pablo's Spanish forebearers. Whatever he has done wrong comes from sin, not only his sins, but those of the people who must have hurt him in his childhood to so deform his Catholic sense. With the same breath or keyboard strokes we could ask a blessing on Pablo and the fathers, and do much more good. Prayer may help; epithets will not.

By the way, my ancestry is German/Welsh/British American, not Spanish so far as I know, but we are one body with all who belong to our King, Jesus Christ.

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #12 on:** October 25, 2015, 05:51:30 PM »

Quote from: MariaAngelaGrow

Prayer may help; epithets will not.

It will only confirm the unjust in their sin because of their pride.

covet truth · « **Reply #13 on:** October 25, 2015, 06:00:05 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

I'm not convinced that either Bawden or Ambrose are priests of bishops. But in danger of death, I would roll the dice on Bawden. That just occurred to me and is absolutely the choice I would make if my soul depended on it in such a nightmarish fate. Even more emphatically, if I had to choose between a priest ordained by one or the other, I would go with a Bawden priest.

David Bawden is a valid priest? How can that be? He tried the SSPX seminary back in the 70's but it was determined pretty quickly that he didn't have a vocation to the priesthood. Whatever his situation now, following him is not an option for a Catholic.

LucasL · « **Reply #14 on:** October 25, 2015, 06:00:47 PM »

There're spanish people in Mexico from the same area that Spain (Europe)
My grandmother was spanish from Spain and what you call spanish in Mexico is usually spanish + native (mexicans)

Mexicans are usually very polite and well educated. They are very devoted just like their Spanish ancestors.