Author Topic: Pablo at it again.... (Read 12352 times)

Centroamerica · « **Reply #15 on:** November 19, 2014, 07:38:55 PM »

We shouldn't comment anymore on the spammed threads becuase the moderator will have a hard time finding them all. We should only select a thread to comment on. The Pfeifferites are attempted to move the conversation onto something else. It's a power strategy. Go to outstanding lengths to save reputation.

MaterDominici · « **Reply #16 on:** November 19, 2014, 07:54:18 PM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

We shouldn't comment anymore on the spammed threads becuase the moderator will have a hard time finding them all. We should only select a thread to comment on. The Pfeifferites are attempted to move the conversation onto something else. It's a power strategy. Go to outstanding lengths to save reputation.

No post? Then he wins.
:furtive:

Just kidding!

You'll notice the posts aren't really there. It leaves him as "last post" when you delete straight from the database.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #17 on:** November 19, 2014, 07:57:35 PM »

Just noticed.

ggreg · « **Reply #18 on:** November 20, 2014, 04:27:04 AM »

Quote from: Luker

Goodness, what is happening here now??!?! we got patIV spamming his post all over the place even dredging up old threads from years ago to post some list.

I have never been a member or supporter of the Resistance, and thanks to these recent developments I wouldn't get within a mile of any Resistance chapel, but still as fellow Catholics I am embarrassed that this spat has come to this. This is so unbelievably juvenile I am (nearly) speechless. I would never have guessed that I would look back fondly to the red-letter days when 62meyer regaled us with his tales from Rome on the prairie...

Why the resistance won't amount to anything.

No leadership
Dim followers
Reliance on fantasy
Claims of “activism” …by those who don’t even act

Pete Vere · « **Reply #19 on:** November 20, 2014, 05:30:54 AM »

Quote from: ggreg

Why the resistance won't amount to anything.

No leadership
Dim followers
Reliance on fantasy
Claims of “activism” …by those who don’t even act

Interesting.

I was thinking....

- Divided leadership
- Inexperienced followers
- Reliance on alleged private prophecy and external conspiracy
- No clear distinction from sedeprivationism, except in name only
- No stability or consistency
- Lots of initiative, but no momentum