Author Topic: Outstanding Sermon on Sedevacantism by Fr. Pfeiffer (Read 48175 times)

Mithrandylan · « **Reply #65 on:** May 05, 2014, 08:58:49 PM »

There was a thread not too long ago about Black Irish being a troll.

I didn't pay much attention to the thread, but it seems evident that she is, and a truly tremendous one.

Unfortunately, if this thread had any promise, she killed it with her obnoxious and brainwashed pre-programmed responses.

BlackIrish · « **Reply #66 on:** May 06, 2014, 08:31:28 AM »

Quote from: Mithrandylan

There was a thread not too long ago about Black Irish being a troll.

I didn't pay much attention to the thread, but it seems evident that she is, and a truly tremendous one.

Unfortunately, if this thread had any promise, she killed it with her obnoxious and brainwashed pre-programmed responses.

Interesting, oh most Pope-ish Mithrandylan . . . different strokes for different folks. Better to be a troll than a sad sede.

BlackIrish · « **Reply #67 on:** May 06, 2014, 09:02:51 AM »

Quote from: Ambrose

Quote from: BlackIrish
Quote from: Pete Vere
Quote from: BlackIrish
Why adopt garb that even remotely resembles that of professed enemies of the Roman Catholic Church? [/color][/size]

Given that both Popes Pius XI and Pius XII were members, as were numerous American cardinals before the Second Vatican Council, I am not sure where to even begin an answer to your question...

Begin by giving proof of their membership. That is was a true and active membership and not an honourary membership. Also, docuмents where they recognized this organization and approved of it.

What evidence do you have against this group that they are anything other than a Catholic fraternal group?

From my reading about them, they were formed in 1904 with Church approval and resemble the Knights of Columbus.

I would not want any part of any group affiliated with the Conciliar church, but that is a lot different than calling them (or even insinuating) that they are Masonic. The men in this group have a right to their good names and not to be calumniated.

Give me a second Tyler Ambrose, I have to put my black, pointy hat aside . . .

Well, perhaps, it's just a bit too close for comfort:

http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/obscure2/cath.html

http://www.alhambralodge.com/category/lodge-gallery/

Cyber huggs & kisses,

The Troll

hugeman · « **Reply #68 on:** May 06, 2014, 11:15:56 AM »

I didn't have the patience nor the time to keep going through these posts, so I finally listened to the sermon of Father Pfeiffer 's featured in the original post.

I don't have time right now to go through all the errors and problems with this "excellent sermon on SedeVantism." Suffice if to say right now, however, it is far from excellent. If the worldwide resistance movement against the sspx' slide into modernism is based on the theological thinking in this sermon, they are wasting their time. Fellay, Pflugger, Rostand could have written this stuff (well, okay, Rostand could not have even thought it, let alone write it).

The most glaring error is equating Our Lord Jesus Christ as a jew like Caiphas and Judas. Our Lord Jesus Christ was an Israelite, born of the House of David, as the scriptures said He would be. He had no relationship to the Babylonian jews who returned intermixed with the tribes of Israelites from the captivity. These leeches have been forever sucking off of the Israelites. Christ our God said to their very face "you don't hear me because you are not of My Father--if you were of My Father, you would here my
words," Christ explained that He had been sent to redeem the lost "sheep of the House of Israel"--not the jews.

The Jєωιѕн people today have no connection to the House of Israel, or to the Israelites-- this is a myth bandied about to con the Israelites into selling away their birthright. The consequences of this faulty thinking is that "jews are our elder brothers" ( Ratzinger, Brogoglio, Fellay and Pfeiffer), and, "they are justified in awaiting the Messiah" (Ratzinger, Brogoglio, Fellay?, Pfeiffer?).

Only after one buys this falsehood can one then accept the notion that Almighty God selected a communist, atheidtic, socialistic, heretic as the Vicar of Jesus Christ-- to lead the sheep of the Catholic Church. Why, praytell, wouldn't He have just put the wolves in charge in the desert, and just annihiliatef the whole lot of His people right there--right then-- instead of preserving them for the Promised Land?

Ambrose · « **Reply #69 on:** May 06, 2014, 12:18:49 PM »

Quote from: BlackIrish

Quote from: Ambrose
Quote from: BlackIrish
Quote from: Pete Vere
Quote from: BlackIrish
Why adopt garb that even remotely resembles that of professed enemies of the Roman Catholic Church? [/color][/size]

Given that both Popes Pius XI and Pius XII were members, as were numerous American cardinals before the Second Vatican Council, I am not sure where to even begin an answer to your question...

Begin by giving proof of their membership. That is was a true and active membership and not an honourary membership. Also, docuмents where they recognized this organization and approved of it.

What evidence do you have against this group that they are anything other than a Catholic fraternal group?

From my reading about them, they were formed in 1904 with Church approval and resemble the Knights of Columbus.

I would not want any part of any group affiliated with the Conciliar church, but that is a lot different than calling them (or even insinuating) that they are Masonic. The men in this group have a right to their good names and not to be calumniated.

Give me a second Tyler Ambrose, I have to put my black, pointy hat aside . . .

Well, perhaps, it's just a bit too close for comfort:

http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/obscure2/cath.html

http://www.alhambralodge.com/category/lodge-gallery/

Cyber huggs & kisses,

The Troll

I read your links, the first proves nothing, the second has nothing to do with the topic.

You should be careful, to allege that this group is Masonic is to harm the reputations of all members since it was founded in 1904. It doesn't seem that you have done any serious research into this and are relying on rash judgment.