Carry On, Crusaders! Remember you have the chrism of your confirmation upon your shoulders, with the Holy Ghost covering your back! You can look at the comments of the Post Falls conference, to form questions, and be ready with their stupid responses!

God Bless You !
www.sossaveoursspx.comSave the SSPX, Save Our Souls!

I would be very surprised if there is much of an opportunity for Q&A, as the damage control tour generally resembles a party line communique format.

And I would be even more surprised, if there were an opportunity for Q&A, if any resistance parishioners spoke out, knowing that since most people have already chosen sides, the conference will be more of a high school pep rally than an honest exploration of the major points of contention.

These events are to rally the troops, not to give a platform to the arguments of the other side, and that being the case, it would take a special breed to walk into the lions den and ask the hard questions (if the opportunity to do so will even exist in the first place).

Pray that many poor souls are woke up this evening. It is at 7 p.m central time. Perhaps say your rosaries during that time? God bless!

Okay, it's probably over now.  

ANY NEWS????

It takes some dedication to keep up with this stuff.  I hope some of
the attendees were well prepared.  

It might come to having picket lines, you know, lots of volunteers
with banners, flags, posters-on-a-stick, chanting slogans.  So long as
you stay on the sidewalk and keep moving they can't arrest you for
peaceful assembly.  The only way for the Menzingen-denizens to get
up a charge of "inciting a riot" would be if THEY PROVIDE THE RIOT.

Well, let them go ahead and provide the riot then.  That would be great!

Quote from: sspxbvm

http://ourladysresistance.org/what-to-expect-at-april-16-conference.html

Dear sspxbvm,

I checked out your page and it looks pretty good.  I would like to offer a
couple of suggestions, if you're interested:  "We pray that, as often is the
case, negative publicity is better than no publicity and that many honest
and sincere souls are awoken this Tuesday evening."  This ought to say
"...sincere souls are awakened this Tuesday evening."  Also, when you
capitalize "Apostate Rome" it looks like a proper noun, and I dare you to
find it on a map.  So it's a "subjective reality" and as such, makes you
look like a liberal.. I would suggest using "apostate Rome," or at most use
italics, like this: "apostate Rome."  This occurs 5 times on this page,
so one correction would be multiplied by 5.  There are other things, too
but I don't want to upset you with too many details.  Those two things
would add a lot to your credibility.

i KnOw. I wAs A lItTlE eXcItEd

HE WON'T read out to us the terms of the Doctrinal Preamble of April 15, 2012 between Bishop Fellay and [apostate] Rome and explain to us what it really means and what its consequences could be.

This is a great point.  

My observation on this is, that +Fellay has not acknowledged his response.  
This is properly termed his 15 April 2012 Response to the Doctrinal Preamble
of September 14th, 2011 from Rome.  +W refers to it as the "Doctrinal
Declaration (of the SSPX), addressed by the General Council of the Society
of St Pius X to the Church authorities in Rome."

But I like to ask, "Why has +Fellay not acknowledged it?"  Bishop Williamson
made it a topic of an entire EC which was probably his most technical EC ever.
He did not hold back on the jargon and lexicon in his Letter to the Priests that
came two weeks before that EC 300, 13 Apr. 2013 (OPEN LETTER TO PRIESTS
of the SOCIETY of ST PIUS X, 28 March 2013, Holy Thursday).  It is a hard read
by anyone's standards.  He gave the priests a 2-week window to study up
before getting pounded by the Faithfuls' questions!

And +Fellay got all worked up into a tizzy over it.  He DID NOT WANT that
response of his leaked out.  Now it comes out that he had shared it with the
other 3 bishops and a select small group (a.k.a. the Menzingen-denizens) in
April and May of 2012, but he SWORE THEM TO SECRECY.  Now why would
he bother to make them swear to secrecy?  Because he does not want the
lemmings in the pews to know about this!  Because it contains principles
that are CONTRADICTORY to the openly expressed truths that ABL gave
out freely to all the Faithful of the world, without restriction.  

So now, when anyone chimes in with the Accordista canard of "how do you
know that's really the Response of +Fellay to Rome" all you have to do is
tell them, "Well, if it is NOT, then why has +Fellay not denied it?  After all,
if it was FALSE, then all he would have to do is SAY SO, and say "THIS IS
FALSE."  But he doesn't do that, does he?  No, he doesn't.  He hasn't,
he isn't, and he won't!! HOW DO I KNOW that?  Because, he does not want
the Faithful thinking about it.  

And this is how he accomplishes that trick:  To Keep Everyone From
Thinking About It, He Simply Pretends It's Not Authentic.  

You know, he has claimed that other things are "Internet rumours" and the
like, but notice how he has been frequently VAGUE about the object of his
accusation.  WHAT is the "rumour" to which he refers?  He doesn't say!  

And why not? Well, he lets you think you are "smart" by figuring it out on
your own. He says it without saying it.  This is a Communist tactic, one of
the errors of Russia, only it is WE who are doing it, by following his evil
leadership.  In this way, he has not said that the Response that +W has
disseminated by way of his unforgivable ECs is a "rumour" that we should
ignore, but even though he has not said it, he still has all the lemmings
believing it!!  

TA - DAAA!!

Rabbit out of the hat trick!  

And now for the clincher:  Why does he not just say "That is not my
Response?" Because then someone with one or two brain cells left
between their ears is going to ask, "OKAY, IF THAT ISN'T YOUR RESPONSE,
THEN SHOW US WHAT YOUR RESPONSE ACTUALLY WAS!!" And what's he
going to do?  Admit that he doesn't want you to see it?  No way!! That's the
truth but he does not want you to think about that truth.

So to keep you from thinking about demanding to see his Response to
the Doctrinal Preamble (Oh, right - the Doctrinal Preamble from 19 months
ago that we STILL HAVE NOT SEEN!!), he simply neglects to "even go there."

And the lap-cat-lemmings sit there and let him pet you and you purr.




 Purr, Pray, Pay and Obey!  



The Newmass needed Annibale Bugnini, Communism in Venezuela needed
Hugo Chavez, nαzι Germany needed Adolf Hitler, and the Neo-SSPX needs
B. Fellay.