Source of the info is from Fr. Kenneth Walker's mother. Fr. Walker was never buried in Phoenix but his body was given to Mom, sister of Kathleen.
Why is it Hun? that you wish to call the episode bizarre, accusations? Why do I get a feeling that you are trying to blow the info away? Do you have a truer story? Let's here it.
Kathleen Plumb is the Aunt of Fr. Kenneth Walker. Do you not think that sisters communicate after a son/nephew has died? Kathleen Plumb does not wish to have people like yourself to harm a traditional newspaper. She is to smart for you Hun! She too has been through death and pain in her family.
I have a birds view of this issue of Fr. Walker, and you a Hun's view. As for Fr. Terre, he was beaten to a pulp as one might say. Both his hands were wrapped so much, could he say Mass, no. His head so beaten, that he could not figure math and he left this area. Where he is I do not know.
We here in Phoenix, know of this subject and we know of at least 2 other new order priests over the years that had mysterious deaths. This is not news, this is not just here, it has happened to other priest, like Fr. Kutz.
We here on this forum go beyond propaganda newspapers.
IMO, I see you Hun, as a troll.
I cant' help but wonder about of your state of mind and intention.
First bizarre thing was trying to connect Fr. Walker death to the bishop visit at OLOS Phoenix.
Second even more bizarre thing was from you to accuse FSSP of Fr. Walker's assassination by 11 shots what would be a criminal case even today and should be investigated by law enforcement authorities.
When I asked for supporting information you never gave one.
You posted once: "Source: The Four Marks newspaper, editor Kathleen Plumb Box 58, Ballantine, MT 59006 www.FourMarks.com
Later you posted: "Source of the info is form Fr. Kenneth Walker's mother."
So which one?
I contacted directly Kathleen Plum, editor of The Four Marks
newspaper and on May 2, 2019 she replied to me as follows:"Cathinfo is a blog, and blogs are only as good as the rules they use for their comments. It is my experience that cathinfo is particularly disreputable. It is no surprise if they may give my name and my paper as the source, and try to smear me. But, The Four Marks is obviously not the source of the statement below."
In my last comment I wrote you that one of you is lying. And that's not good.
Finally, I want to disclose that I disagree with FSSP.
(As a side note: After you were corrected several times, would you learn the pastor's correct name as Father Terra?)
You say: "We here in Phoenix, know of this subject ..."
BTW, I've been living in Phoenix for long and I know more than you think but this is not the subject.
You say: "IMO, I see you Hun, as a troll."
. I don't want to label you anyway because it's done by your actions, however you shouldn't post on Cathinfo.
This was my last comment on this issue.