Author Topic: Open Letter to Bp. Fellay (Read 3013 times)

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #15 on:** September 14, 2012, 10:26:15 PM »

I feel that Bishop Fellay should resign for several reasons.

1) Archbishop Lefevbre DID NOT WANT a bishop as Superior General of the SSPX in the first place, so as not to give ANY of the SSPX bishops some kind of supreme mantle of authority, as exhibited by Bishop Fellay right now. A priest or a layperson was supposed to be in that position, and Bishop Fellay is entirely AWARE of this fact.

2) He admits to being "deceived" by BXVI. There are other priests who would not be so unwise to even dialogue with the Vatican until they've come back to the Faith entirely and without asking for any compromise except to be forgiven for being misled by the Devil himself.

3) Being in the position he's in, he is causing massive rifts among the faithful of the SSPX. Since the "conditions" were leaked, it's obvious that he is not doing what is in the best interests of the Society.

For these 3 reasons (and probably more if I thought of it a bit more), it's not hard to figure out that this is the best course of action for the Society and the rest of the faithful Catholics NOT part of the Society that he represents. Step down, with all due respect, Bishop Fellay, and let someone that is NOT a bishop be the Superior General. You will gain some of the respect you have lost, and continue with Archbishop Lefevbre's mission: THE SALVATION OF SOULS THROUGH THE ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH, OUTSIDE OF WHICH THERE IS NO SALVATION.

trento · « **Reply #16 on:** September 15, 2012, 11:31:58 AM »

Quote from: parentsfortruth

I feel that Bishop Fellay should resign for several reasons.

1) Archbishop Lefevbre DID NOT WANT a bishop as Superior General of the SSPX in the first place, so as not to give ANY of the SSPX bishops some kind of supreme mantle of authority, as exhibited by Bishop Fellay right now. A priest or a layperson was supposed to be in that position, and Bishop Fellay is entirely AWARE of this fact.

2) He admits to being "deceived" by BXVI. There are other priests who would not be so unwise to even dialogue with the Vatican until they've come back to the Faith entirely and without asking for any compromise except to be forgiven for being misled by the Devil himself.

3) Being in the position he's in, he is causing massive rifts among the faithful of the SSPX. Since the "conditions" were leaked, it's obvious that he is not doing what is in the best interests of the Society.

For these 3 reasons (and probably more if I thought of it a bit more), it's not hard to figure out that this is the best course of action for the Society and the rest of the faithful Catholics NOT part of the Society that he represents. Step down, with all due respect, Bishop Fellay, and let someone that is NOT a bishop be the Superior General. You will gain some of the respect you have lost, and continue with Archbishop Lefevbre's mission: THE SALVATION OF SOULS THROUGH THE ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH, OUTSIDE OF WHICH THERE IS NO SALVATION.

Regarding your point #1, how can a layperson be a Superior General of a priestly fraternity? It doesn't make sense!

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #17 on:** September 16, 2012, 08:02:03 AM »

It's not that a layperson -should- have that position. It was the fact that a bishop -should not- have that position for the very reason I mentioned. Obviously preferable to Archbishop Lefevbre, was that a priest should be in charge. If a bishop is in charge, the exact circuмstance the SSPX is in right now is a result of it. Exactly what he feared could happen is happening.

The bishops were not supposed to be Superior General so as not to give off an idea of supreme authority over the Society. Fellay is not in charge of the bishops. He's not their "boss" you could say. But, he is giving off the vibe that he is their boss, precisely by his reaction to Bishop Williamson going down to Brazil and DOING HIS JOB. Having to ask "permission" to confirm people, and he knows this, is absolutely ridiculous. Bishop Williamson is doing his divine duty. He doesn't need to ask Fellay's permission to do this.

Also, it sends a confusing message, as if he's overlord of some sect. If you had a priest in this position, there would be no such confusion.

stgobnait · « **Reply #18 on:** September 16, 2012, 08:16:55 AM »

max...... is a layperson... isnt he....?

Ethelred · « **Reply #19 on:** September 16, 2012, 09:16:19 AM »

Quote from: stgobnait

max...... is a layperson... isnt he....?

Max Krah is a layperson who works so closely with the SSPX superior general's 1st assistant Fr. Niklaus Pfluger, that Krah even writes text docuмents for Fr. Pfluger which the latter then just refines and directly uses as official docuмents within the SSPX.
(And Krah does try to do so with other superiors, too, namely the German district superior Fr Schmidberger. That's why many of the German district's official publications read like they've been directly written by Krah.)

Now Fr. Pfluger in-turn directly influences the superior general Bp Fellay so intensively, that experienced district superiors (plural!) upon request say this to you privately: Without Fr Pfluger, Bp Fellay wouldn't survive his office for two weeks.

I don't want to downplay the heavy blame of Bp Fellay. Because objectively (not necessarily subjectively) he's guilty of having betrayed the work of Archbishop Lefebvre to the modernistic Newrome, see his unmasking letter dated 14 April 2012 in reply to the serious letter of the three bishops dated 7 April 2012. And he sold out the SSPX to the oldest enemies of our Lord, the anti-Christian and perfidious Jєωs, and their controlled vile media, by teaming up with them in 2009 in order to verbally slaughter Bishop Williamson and his friends in the SSPX.

Having said this, there's a massive influence from the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan through their mole Krah (a layperson) to Fr Pfluger (maybe just an ordinary priest) and other superiors, and then to Bp Fellay (a bishop).

So I think it's difficult to tell how many forces really lead the SSPX. Is that why they want to join Newrome because it's also not always clear how many persons lead the Newchurch?
One weak leader + another weak leader = one strong leader? I don't think so!

trento · « **Reply #20 on:** September 16, 2012, 09:16:59 AM »

Quote from: parentsfortruth

It's not that a layperson -should- have that position. It was the fact that a bishop -should not- have that position for the very reason I mentioned. Obviously preferable to Archbishop Lefevbre, was that a priest should be in charge. If a bishop is in charge, the exact circuмstance the SSPX is in right now is a result of it. Exactly what he feared could happen is happening.

The bishops were not supposed to be Superior General so as not to give off an idea of supreme authority over the Society. Fellay is not in charge of the bishops. He's not their "boss" you could say. But, he is giving off the vibe that he is their boss, precisely by his reaction to Bishop Williamson going down to Brazil and DOING HIS JOB. Having to ask "permission" to confirm people, and he knows this, is absolutely ridiculous. Bishop Williamson is doing his divine duty. He doesn't need to ask Fellay's permission to do this.

Also, it sends a confusing message, as if he's overlord of some sect. If you had a priest in this position, there would be no such confusion.

I don't think so. +Fellay regardless of his episcopal dignity is the Superior General. Before +Fellay, it was Fr. Schmidberger, and before that it was +Lefebvre. I just don't get your point about having a layperson being the SG of the Society. I do agree with you that it was +Lefebvre's will that no bishop is made the SG.

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #21 on:** September 16, 2012, 03:11:36 PM »

Methinks there is more to it than simply Fellay. Even if he did step down, with all the rats that have been placed in the General Assembly (or whatever it's called) by him, it's likely that the Society would get the same kind of problem child that Fellay is.

This is a war. Strategies are being used, just as they would in a war situation. I know what will happen if Fellay makes some kind of deal: I will be watching Bishop Williamson very carefully to see what he will do. Whatever he decides to do, it's pretty likely that is what should be done.

poche · « **Reply #22 on:** September 27, 2012, 05:23:40 AM »

This is something that we need to pray about