Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON  (Read 2443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cristera

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: +380/-1
  • Gender: Female
OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
« on: June 30, 2012, 11:16:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Father Moulin asks Bishop Williamson to go to the General Chapter despite the prohibition of Bishop Fellay:

    This is a google translation.

    Quote
    Open Letter to Archbishop Richard Williamson

    Bishop,

    Please forgive the public nature of these lines that I would respectfully and kindly to send you, following the latter's internal mail Secretary General of the Society informing us of your exclusion to the next General Chapter Ecône.

    Also, is it the personal friend of Archbishop Lefebvre, the Dean of the bishops of the Society, the former superior, Deputy Director of the Seminary of Ecône, my former professor of philosophy and theology, to a Brother elder in the priesthood and finally to the Friend of more than forty years of my family providentially met under the aegis of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, I respectfully ask you not to consider this letter, a likely consequence of and unfortunate misunderstanding about you, and not to give up to go as planned in Ecône for the General Chapter in July. It is true that in these difficult times through which the fraternity according to the charitable words of King Louis XVI expressed in his admirable will "often in times of trouble and turmoil, it is not master of himself."

    To ignore the canon 1331 § 1 and No. 2 clumsily invoked against yourself as well condemn the "rebellion and disobedience" of Archbishop Lefebvre and undermine the legitimacy of his disobedience towards the modernist towards Rome who heads the Church since the last Council!

    Real misunderstanding, if I judge my personal knowledge of our Superior General with whom I entered the seminary of Ecône there are now almost 35 years, which allows me to say that one who, for months, if one shows real kindness, understanding and charity towards former enemies of the Church and the Brotherhood, and accepts in an open dialogue with them since they seem to suspend their persecution against us ... can not now forgive his "colleague weapon" some differences of obedience after so many years of common struggles, faithful and heroic service of Christ the King, his church, Faith, Holy Mass and the priesthood in line of battle of Archbishop Lefebvre.

    He wants more punishment that a real "Bishop talks" and responds modestly weekly legitimate questions of "Catholics perplexed" at this trend but positive long considered the conciliar church. When very delicate when they are asked to take careful and objective study of the texts of Vatican II, and "read between the lines' texts, press releases and decisions of the Roman authorities, in order to recognize these changes pleased that the bow, not secretly but discreetly, to review favorably on behalf of any tradition, fair judgment on provisions of the Roman authorities against us and sincerity to make some reform of their "church". For example, be attentive to the facts, such as that which occurred recently in Corsica, where the local bishop has generously offered to come and confirm the faithful in our chapel, according to the traditional rite ...

    Moreover, as it is, my lord, that providentially you are not engaged in doctrinal discussions with the Roman authorities, it seems to me that our Superior, concerned about our future independence of words, and apostolic action Fraternity "intramural" can not but rejoice in your freedom of speech, authentic and traditional privilege of every Catholic bishop, both pastor, guardian and defender of the little flock against all enemies of the Church, both from outside from the inside. The Church shows us does not St Paul preaching the gospel doctrine "in season and out" to take seriously and forcefully even the great St. Peter himself? "When Cephas came to Antioch, I resisted him in the face because he happened to have strong ... I said to Peter in front of everyone ... "(Gal. II)

    It is difficult also to imagine that our Superior General, who was one of the students more attentive to your lecture at the seminary of Ecône, and who owes you, and Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, the most of his solid philosophical and theological formation, can in this particularly critical for the future of our Fraternity, dispense your expertise and your lights at the next General Chapter which probably mark its history.

    I find it especially difficult to conceive that our Superior, always anxious to unity in the Brotherhood, can legitimately exclude one of four bishops chosen by Archbishop Lefebvre himself without breaking the close and indissoluble union willed by him, and destroy their harmonious complementarity.

    Your servant is personally convinced that you have been providentially chosen by our Founder, in order to effectively prevent, for your personal charisma and meritorious convert from Anglicanism, a protestant always possible "in our modest fraternity after attending powerless, to that made for fifty years in the whole Church.

    I find it difficult to understand that he wants to go without your precious knowledge of subversive tactics, modernist, liberal revolutionaries and enemies of the Church. Training largely enriched over time by your contacts close and friendly with some men who have been providentially raised up to our time (although, alas, a number of them have become quite unpopular in our traditional media following the the structure of a certain "Gentleman Burglar"!) I think particularly to these gentlemen and Pierre Virion A.-M. Bonnet Viller ... and many others including John Vaquier ... who are all writers need to know about forming a good understanding of the terrible crisis of faith, social policy and we are going through and including our Superior can not ignore the writings on the recommendation of the Lord inviting his disciples to "be as simple doves and wise as serpents. "

    I find it hard to imagine the last General Chapter without your distinguished presence, which could perhaps out of solidarity, to deprive him also of the presence of your two other Brothers in the Episcopate, but also to deprive our Superior General of your valuable advice in the final drafting of the underlying reasons that will necessarily move to the Roman authorities to justify the refusal of the Society to accept the terms of the latest proposal of Cardinal Levada he deemed unacceptable.

    God grant that this misunderstanding promptly and happily dispelled, the General Chapter in its entirety, can find its legitimacy, and allow, in peace and unity to all the delegates to agree, both with time to meditate fruit this truth beautifully expressed by St. John Chrysostom said that "there is more to rely on the wounds of a friend than kisses from an enemy eager" to work and finally to ask the Roman authorities, with the lifting of excommunication of the two major Forget the full restoration of our revered and regretted 'founder Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to whom we owe so much!

    Hoping with all my heart that you take into account my supplication, please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my respectful and priestly friendship in Christo Rege and Maria.



    Original in french HERE


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31174
    • Reputation: +27088/-494
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #1 on: June 30, 2012, 12:11:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm sure many here would pay to see a video of Bishop Williamson calmly entering the General Chapter despite the prohibition -- and the drama that would ensue.

    I'm sure there are some that would pay even if a video weren't made -- they'd be content to read about it later :)
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline johnharms3

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 1
    • Reputation: +11/-0
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #2 on: June 30, 2012, 01:50:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If Bp Williamson has been barred from attending the General Chapter by
    Bp.Fellay, why then won't the other two bishops refuse to attend as well??
    I cannot understand why there's no greater outcry about Fellay's outrageous
    behaviour.Perhaps the devil himself has got him by the throat.
    Forty years ago some procedure should have been put in place to stop what
    has recently transpired.On the other hand no-one could possibly have foreseen this.
    Fellay's attitude can only be explaned if the Pope in pectore promised him
    a cardinal's hat. Or am I being cynical here?

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #3 on: June 30, 2012, 01:55:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Anyone capable of rendering a better translation I can send to some priests I know?
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Sunbeam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 246
    • Reputation: +277/-2
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #4 on: June 30, 2012, 03:55:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Seraphim,

    I have a better translation in progress.


    Offline Clint

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 161
    • Reputation: +299/-0
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #5 on: June 30, 2012, 04:06:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: johnharms3
    If Bp Williamson has been barred from attending the General Chapter by
    Bp.Fellay, why then won't the other two bishops refuse to attend as well??
    I cannot understand why there's no greater outcry about Fellay's outrageous
    behaviour.


    Excellent observation. I believe that Bp. Williamson will attend, along with all the others that are barred. If Bp. Willamson is thrown out, then everyone who is with him can threaten to also walk out. It'll be interesting.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #6 on: June 30, 2012, 05:07:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: johnharms3
    If Bp Williamson has been barred from attending the General Chapter by
    Bp.Fellay, why then won't the other two bishops refuse to attend as well??
    I cannot understand why there's no greater outcry about Fellay's outrageous
    behaviour.Perhaps the devil himself has got him by the throat.
    Forty years ago some procedure should have been put in place to stop what
    has recently transpired.On the other hand no-one could possibly have foreseen this.
    Fellay's attitude can only be explaned if the Pope in pectore promised him
    a cardinal's hat. Or am I being cynical here?



    Bp. Fellay is afraid of Bishop Williamson, so he deparately misapplies
    Canon law to block him from the General Chapter meeting.

    No doubt Msgr. Fellay will have his "Brownshirts" out at the meeting to
    strong-arm any who get in his way.

    Its so very hard to be a part of the "Pope's team" and earn a Cardinal's hat nowadays


     :incense:
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Sunbeam

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 246
    • Reputation: +277/-2
    • Gender: Male
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #7 on: June 30, 2012, 06:56:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Seraphim,
    Here's the best that I can do with it at present. There are a few places where the writer's turn of phrase is not easy to follow, but on the whole I think that this translation makes sense. I'm open to suggestions where the writer's meaning might be rendered more clearly.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Open Letter
    To his Excellency Monsignor Richard WILLIAMSON
    St George’s House
    125 Arthur Road
    Wimbledon Park
    GB-LONDON
    SW19 7DR

    [From] Father Charles Moulin
    Priory of St Joseph
    17 Place St Claire
    06300 NICE

    Nice, 29 June 2012

    My Lord,

    Please forgive the public nature of these lines that I permit myself respectfully and amicably to send to you, as a result of the last internal mail from the General Secretary of the Fraternity informing us of your exclusion from the next General Chapter at Ecône.

    Also, it is to a personal friend of Archbishop Lefebvre, to the Dean of the bishops of the Society, to the old Superior, Deputy Director of the seminary of Ecône, to my former professor of philosophy and theology, to an elder in the priesthood and lastly to a friend of my family for more than forty years providentially brought together under the protection of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, that I respectfully ask you to consider this letter, the consequence of a probable and unfortunate misunderstanding about you, and [ask you] not to give up going to Ecône as planned for the General Chapter this July! In these difficult times through which the Fraternity is passing, it is true that - according to the charitable words of the good king Louis XVI in his admirable testament - "often in times of trouble and turmoil, a man is not master of himself."

    Take no account of Canon No. 1331 § 2, clumsily invoked against yourself, which may equally condemn the "rebellion and disobedience" of Archbishop Lefebvre and undermine the legitimacy of his disobedience towards modernist Rome which has directed the Church since the last Council !

    A real misunderstanding, if I engage my personal knowledge of our Superior General - with whom I entered the seminary at Ecône now well over 35 years ago - which allows me to say that he who, for some months, put on a really good show of benevolence, understanding and charity towards former enemies of the Church and the Fraternity, and who accepted in a spirit of openness to dialogue with them, since they seemed to suspend their persecution against us ... cannot, today, forgive his "brother-in-arms" some differences about obedience, after so many years of common struggle and faithful heroism in the service of Christ the King, of his Church, of the Faith, of the Holy Mass and of the Priesthood in the right line of battle of Mgr Lefebvre.

    He wants more to punish the fact that a true "Bishop speaks" and responds modestly every week to the legitimate questions of "Catholics confused" by this evolution long judged positively by the Conciliar Church. At a very delicate moment, where he asked them to make a careful and objective study of the texts of Vatican II, and "to read between the lines” of the texts, communications and decisions of the Roman authorities, to discern in them those happy changes which lean, not secretly but discreetly, to favorably revise, in the name of the whole of Tradition, his judgment on the loyal dispositions of the Roman authorities at our meetings and their sincerity about making some reform of their "Church". For example, to be attentive to the facts, such as that which occurred recently in Corsica, where the bishop of the place has generously offered to come to confirm the faithful of our chapel according to the traditional rite ...

    Moreover, as it is found, my lord, that providentially you are not engaged in the doctrinal discussions with the Roman authorities, it seems to me that our Superior - concerned about our future independence of speech, and about the "intra-mural" apostolic action of the Fraternity - can only rejoice at your freedom of speech, an authentic and traditional privilege of every Catholic bishop, as both pastor, guardian and defender of the little flock against all enemies of the Church, [who work] both from outside and from within. Does not the Church shows us St Paul preaching sound doctrine "in season and out of season" to severely and even forcefully reprehend the great St. Peter himself? "When Cephas came to Antioch, I withstood him to the face that he was being wrong ... I said to Peter in front of everyone ... " (Gal.2:11-14)

    It is equally difficult for me to imagine that our Superior General - who, of the students at the seminary in Ecône, was the one most attentive to your lectures, and who owes to you, as well as Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, the bulk of his solid philosophical and theological formation - can, in this particularly critical period for the future of our Fraternity, dispense with your expertise and with your insights during the next General Chapter which, without doubt, will mark its history.

    It is especially difficult for me to imagine that our Superior, always anxious to unite our Fraternity, can legitimately exclude one of the four bishops, chosen by Archbishop Lefebvre himself, without breaking the close and indissoluble union desired by him, and [without] destroying their harmonious complementarity.

    Your servant being personally convinced that you have been providentially chosen by our Founder, for your personal charisma and meritorious conversion from Anglicanism, in order to effectively prevent, an ever-possible "protestantization" of our modest Fraternity, after having, over fifty years, helplessly watched that process in the whole Church.

    It is also difficult for me to understand that he wants to deprive himself of your valuable knowledge in the field of subversive tactics, modernists, liberals and revolutionary enemies of the Church. Formation largely enriched over time by your friendly and close contacts with some men who have been providentially raised up for our time (although, alas, a certain number of them have become fairly unpopular in our traditional circle following the work a certain "Gentleman Burglar"!) I think most particularly of those gentlemen Pierre Virion and A.-M. Bonnet Viller ... and many others including John Vaquier ... authors who are all essential to know in order to form a good understanding of the terrible religious, social and political crisis that we are going through, and whose writings our Superior cannot ignore according the recommendation of Our Lord in inviting his apostles "to be as harmless as doves and wise as like serpents."

    It is finally difficult for me to imagine this General Chapter without your eminent presence, which might perhaps be reasonably expected for the sake of solidarity, to deprive it also of the presence of your two other brethren in the Episcopate, but above all to deprive our Superior General of your valuable advice in the final drafting of the underlying reasons that he will necessarily put to the Roman authorities to justify the refusal of the Fraternity to accept the terms of the last proposal of Cardinal Levada, judged by him as unacceptable.

    God grant that this misunderstanding is happily and quickly overcome, that the entire General Chapter may find its legitimacy, and allow, in peace and unity, to all the delegates in agreement, have the time both to fruitfully meditate upon the truth beautifully formulated by St John Chrysostom in saying that "the blessings of a friend are to be more trusted than to the eager kisses of an enemy" and finally to work on asking the Roman authorities, with the lifting of excommunication of two great "Forgotten Ones", the full and complete rehabilitation of our revered and lamented founder Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to whom we owe so much!

    Hoping with all my heart that you take into account my supplication, please believe, my lord, in the expression of my respectful and priestly friendship, in Christo Rege and Maria.

    [signed] C.H.Moulin


    Translated by Sunbeam from the French original at:

    Lettre ouverte de l’Abbé Moulin à Mgr Williamson



    Offline Cristera

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 174
    • Reputation: +380/-1
    • Gender: Female
    OPEN LETTER FROM FATHER MOULIN TO BISHOP WILLIAMSON
    « Reply #8 on: June 30, 2012, 07:24:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Good work Sunbeam Thank you. :cheers: