Author Topic: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'? (Read 2680 times)

Sgt Rock USMC · « **Reply #10 on:** July 26, 2021, 02:25:05 PM »

Quote from: Stubborn on July 26, 2021, 01:10:38 PM

Fr. Ward in Colorado Springs? He was a good family friend for the short time he was in MI as a new and newly ordained priest, I hope he still gets on well. Can you let us know what he said or post a video / audio of the conference please?

Father Charles Ward... I don't know if he was in the Springs, I knew him from Chicago. I don't know if I'll make the conference, but I know a lot of the folks who will be attending. I'll do my best to report back.

Stubborn · « **Reply #11 on:** July 26, 2021, 02:45:37 PM »

Quote from: Sgt Rock USMC on July 26, 2021, 02:25:05 PM

Father Charles Ward... I don't know if he was in the Springs, I knew him from Chicago. I don't know if I'll make the conference, but I know a lot of the folks who will be attending. I'll do my best to report back.

Ah ok, I was referring to Fr. Anthony Ward. Thanks!

Sgt Rock USMC · « **Reply #12 on:** July 26, 2021, 02:52:48 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous on July 26, 2021, 02:20:47 PM

Fr. Ward was Bp. Tissier’s warden during HE’s Chicago captivity around 2012.

Never met him but heard reports he’s hard line American SSPX.

Would bet his vax discussion is approved by Menzingen.

If he falters on any aspect of the death serum, he’ll be pummeled on the trad forums.

You are correct, sir... We were very fortunate to be there at the same time of HE's captivity. The good Bishop was able to baptize our 10th child.

We were there for almost 2 years and I thought he was a good priest...He gave one of the best sermons on courtship and preparation for marriage I've ever heard. However, he's a company man, carries the talking points, and tows the line...sadly.

I'm betting the same thing, I'm sure the Company would not allow Father Ward to give a conference to a large chapel without assuring he stays on point. But, I hope I'm wrong.

NatusAdMaiora · « **Reply #13 on:** July 26, 2021, 04:23:48 PM »

Sean, thank you for going into details, and for deciphering Fr. Arnaud Selegny commentary that the SSPX endorsed.

Many youth, including my children are divided on this subject , so I started this thread to get counter-rebuttal points that drive home the necessity to resist the vaccine at all cost.

My observation is that, it is easier to make a decision for the older 50+ trads as compared to younger trads....the struggle is centered around a) employment b) Travel ( trains , buses, flights) c) economic sustainability and d) Educational opportunities

The enemies of God have used a diabolical vaccine to crush our youth, young adolescents, young trad families more than ever before. We need to pray to Our Blessed Mother for her Guidance and for the protection of our children, so they make the right decision with full faith and trust in our Divine Savior.

We are praying that like many Courageous Bishops and Priests(including some from the SSPX)..... the SSPX too endorses a statement from one of their clergy that unequivocally condemns this Covid Vaccine as Evil. I am not sure, and I might be wrong, but I estimate that around 60% of all trads follow the FSSPX, so such an official statement/position is even more pressing at this time as time is running out.....as mentioned after the happenings of July 16th...it should be easier for the SSPX to release such a statement.

B from A · « **Reply #14 on:** July 26, 2021, 04:38:35 PM »

Quote from: NatusAdMaiora on July 26, 2021, 04:23:48 PM

Many youth, including my children are divided on this subject , so I started this thread to get counter-rebuttal points that drive home the necessity to resist the vaccine at all cost.

.

The CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє: A Satanic Program?

By

Father Peter Lang (SSPX)

January - 2021

[Translated from the French original, here:

https://cristiadatradicinalista.blogspot.com/2021/03/vaccin-anti-CÖVÌD19-moral-ou-satanique.html#more]

The mєdια and politicians keep telling us, through massive, constant and skillfully orchestrated propaganda, that there would be no alternative against "cσɾσnαvιɾυs 2019" (CÖVÌD-19; SARS-CoV-2) other than the ναccιnє. They are unanimous: only the vaccination of the entire world population will be able to guarantee general health and prosperity in the future. But is this true?  Of course not.  And even the WHO warns us: "ναccιnє will not bring back the old norm."1  Nevertheless, all over the world, vaccination programs are being put in place. This is why, in the face of all these contradictions, it is our duty as Catholics to ask ourselves: What judgments should we make about these facts covered by many grey areas?

I - Preliminary remarks
Ideally, the ναccιnє issue should be developed in a general way, but that would require a whole study that would take us away from the heart of what we are talking about here.

In 2005, it was avian flu, in 2009 swine flu 2, in 2014 Ebola 3, and in 2016 Zika 4, which were systematically presented as very dangerous and in the face of which vaccination was proposed as the ultimate solution, the miracle cure to control their spread. As a result, some governments ordered millions of doses of ναccιnє, but these were subsequently destroyed 5 .
At the same time, the lie of global warming (that CO2 , which accounts for only 0.39% of the atmosphere, is solely responsible for it) was spreading across the face of the earth.

A simple objective analysis with a bit of common sense shows one lie after another: Let us not lose sight of this fact when we approach the question of CÖVÌD-19. Let us therefore always remain prudent in the face of what is presented to us as no alternative by the world and national political circles, especially when they begin to evoke a "salvation of humanity" by the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє.

II - The CÖVÌD 19 "Pandemic"
The death rate is enough to prove that in the case of CÖVÌD-19, it is not a pandemic: When we compare 2020 to 2019, we see that the death rate in Germany is almost identical from one year to the next; another example: In the United States, the number of deaths in 2020 is even lower than in 2019 - and this despite the propaganda that tried to make the country then still led by Tɾυmρ appear to be dying in a kind of "CÖVÌD-19 hell."

Thus, the latest immunological studies indicate that CÖVÌD-19 case-fatality rates in most countries are generally between 0.10 and 0.50% of the affected population, which is comparable to the influenza waves of 1957 and 1968.

In addition, many virologists have demonstrated that the PCR test has been shown by many virologists to be very inaccurate6 (the package insert also states that it is not approved for diagnosis).  This test only indicates that there is something of the CÖVÌD-19 (virus, dead virus or virus fragments) in an individual's body, but does not indicate in any way whether the individual is actually carrying the CÖVÌD-19 influenza virus itself7. Thus, almost 40% of individuals infected with the CÖVÌD-19 virus remain asymptomatic and almost 40% have symptoms at worst mild. However, the figures that are published every day deliberately and intentionally omit this fact, as the numbers need to remain high, so that the level of fear established in the population does not decrease and the large mass remains docile8.
The fact that CÖVÌD-19 has been presented as a "pandemic" by the mass mєdια around the world (all aligned with each other, which is hardly a good omen (think of ƈσmmυɳιsm or national socialism), is an obvious fact that we have all experienced in recent months.
But why is it so fierce?  Because satanic powers of satanic essence want to install a new ɠƖobaƖıst and communist world order - like ƈhıną - on the ruins of the present order.  A new order deliberately without God, without natural order, without Law and Justice.

III - The ναccιnє Against CÖVÌD-19
The mєdια and politicians tell us daily and through all channels: For the CÖVÌD-19 virus to be controlled, all the inhabitants of the planet must be ναccιnαted. There is no alternative.
In England, vaccination has already taken place since the end of November 2020; in Germany, since the end of December 2020 (vaccination centers have been deployed throughout the country): It is therefore to be expected that we will soon, by one means or another, be forced to undergo this vaccination, with certain countries already offering travel facilities to individuals who have been ναccιnαted (the constraint will therefore be essentially social: Those who refuse it will then be designated as "reckless egoists" or "dangers for themselves and their fellow men"). So, faced with such a situation and considering the unholy atmosphere of lies that surrounds us, what should we think of this ναccιnє itself? We can only expect the worst... Let us approach this question through a brief analysis, always objectively and without any reservations:

a) The Development of the ναccιnє
This ναccιnє was developed in less than a year. Normally and in the past, however, it has always taken at least eight to ten years to develop a ναccιnє (and even then, efficacy was often not achieved). The CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє research simply bypassed the animal testing phase; other trials were ignored and radically simplified and/or shortened to save time. Moreover, the risk-benefit assessment, usually carried out in such procedures, was not carried out by the EU, STIKO9, IQWiG10, let alone the Ethics Committee11, which was not even asked for its opinion.
Everything leads us to believe, therefore, that due to this exceptionally short and "extraordinary" research and development phase (compared to what was known until now), the risk of side effects related to this ναccιnє is even higher than for ναccιnєs developed "by the book." Indeed, at the present time and at this stage, no one really knows what the ultimate damage caused by the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє will be. A few cases of facial paralysis and serious neurological disorders following the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє in the UK give us a first idea of the danger. Thus - and in view of the above - it becomes much clearer that in reality it is we humans who are the cheap guinea pigs in the development of this particular ναccιnє - guinea pigs of whom the "Pope of Vaccination", вιℓℓ gαтeѕ, estimates that 10-15% will die as a result of taking it (deaths considered as "collateral damage")12. There has already been one official death following vaccination in Switzerland13; in Norway, 23 deaths were reported in mid-January 2021 following vaccinations against CÖVÌD-19 14; the Wochenblick of 24.01.2021 reports that 11 elderly people died after the vaccination of 40 residents of a German retirement home in Uhldingen-Mühlhofen; etc. And this is only the beginning: this list will probably expand in the coming weeks and months. But according to the mєdια and politicians, these are only side effects, quite negligible compared to this "terrible" CÖVÌD-19 virus.
The one factor in the blatant neglect with which the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє was developed should already be enough to categorically reject the injection of this ναccιnє. No one can and should be forced to suffer the consequences of the irresponsibility with which this ναccιnє was developed.
b) The mRNA ναccιnє
Michael Hesemann writes15: "BioNtech, a company based in Mainz, claims to be able to give us a ναccιnє against CÖVÌD-19.  But isn't it surprising that the founder of BioNtech stated in a Stern TV show that he himself would not be ναccιnαted? Beware: with his own ναccιnє! "In BioNtech's 2020 annual report to investors, for example, it states (page 15)16: "No mRNA-based immunotherapies have yet been approved to date and it is possible that none will ever be approved. The development of mRNA-based drugs involves significant clinical development and regulatory risks due to the new and unprecedented nature of this new class of therapeutic products.
To investors, we speak clearly. But not to us, the humans, the guinea pigs. In the case of CÖVÌD-19, it is therefore the very first time in the history of vaccination that an mRNA-based method is used. In the past, such a ναccιnє has never gone beyond the stage of animal testing and has never been approved because of the high risk of serious side effects. But with CÖVÌD-19, these concerns no longer play a role. Again, the mєdια and politicians continue to downplay the seriousness of these facts. Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, a virologist, sums up the mRNA ναccιnє problem categorically and unequivocally possible: "The planned 'vaccinations' are genetically modifying us.17 Clearly, this means that we humans can be genetically manipulated for the first time in the history of vaccination. For better or for worse? The answer to this question is easy to give: for worse, of course. If the poor, pathetic little men think they can intervene in the genetic heritage of man - created by God - in order to change it according to their criteria, then this can only lead to devastating consequences.
The administration of this mRNA ναccιnє is nothing but a ʀɛʋօʟutιօn against God and the order He has put in nature. Man thinks he is God. Faced with the "ναccιnє" against CÖVÌD-19, what we Catholics must do is therefore no longer in doubt: categorical rejection.

c) The use of foetuses
Since the 1960s, many ναccιnєs have been developed using fetal cell lines from at least three aborted children. Of course, there are also ναccιnєs that are not based on these cell lines, but they are still often used for testing. With regard to the theological and moral judgment on the issue of the use of the ναccιnєs in question, many Catholics currently rely on a docuмent of the Pontifical Academy for Life dated June 9, 2005,18 which was confirmed by a declaration of the same institution dated July 31, 2017. In this docuмent, the Academy states that "the cell lines currently in use are far removed from the original abortions and therefore no longer involve that bond of moral cooperation which is essential for an ethically negative evaluation of their use". However, in a statement on December 12, 2020, Cardinal Janis Pujats, Archbishop Tomasz Peta, Archbishop Jan Pawel Lenga, Bishop Joseph E. Strickland and Auxiliary Bishop Athanasius Schneider plausibly explain why the reasoning of the Pontifical Academy is unacceptable 19: "The theological principle of material cooperation is certainly valid and can be applied to a whole series of cases (for example, the payment of taxes, the use of products made by slave labor, etc.). This principle, however, can hardly be applied to the case of ναccιnєs produced from fetal cell lines, since those who knowingly and voluntarily accept such ναccιnєs enter into a kind of concatenation, albeit a very distant one, with the workings of the abortion industry. But the crime of abortion is so monstrous that any form of concatenation with this crime, no matter how remote, is immoral and can in no way be accepted by a Catholic once he has become fully aware of it. Whoever makes use of these ναccιnєs must be aware that his or her body would somehow "profit" from the "fruits" (though removed by a series of chemical processes) of one of the greatest crimes of humanity. "(And here, let's make it clear that we are not talking about the cells of dead, aborted, murdered children. No, this would not be appropriate: to be effective, the cells in question - like organs for transplants - must be alive. In concrete terms, this means that babies intended for abortion are delivered by Caesarean section and then - without anaesthesia - the coveted tissue is removed from them20).

Other notable clerics are also very clearly opposed to the use of these CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnєs. In a public letter dated August 15, 2020 21, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, who is close to tradition, stated: "From a moral point of view, for any Catholic who wishes to remain faithful to his Baptism, it is absolutely unacceptable to accept a vaccination that uses materials from human fetuses in the production process. (...) We cannot remain silent if public authorities were to make compulsory ναccιnєs that pose serious ethical or moral problems or that, more prosaically, do not guarantee the desired effects and merely promise benefits that from a scientific point of view are absolutely questionable". In a lecture given on May 20, 2020, Cardinal Raymond Burke also stated: "With regard to vaccination, it must be clear that it is never morally justifiable to develop a ναccιnє using cell lines from aborted fetuses. The idea of introducing such a ναccιnє into one's own body is rightly abhorrent. At the same time, it must be clear that vaccination itself cannot be imposed on citizens in a totalitarian manner. If the state adopts such a practice, it violates the integrity of its citizens. Although the state may establish reasonable regulations to protect health, it is not the ultimate provider of health care. It is God. Anything the state proposes must respect God and his law.

There is nothing more to add to these clear and unequivocal statements by these cardinals and bishops.

d) Marking and traceability by vaccination
вιℓℓ gαтeѕ has already filed a patent in the United States in 2017, called Luciferase, which consists of adding an enzyme to a ναccιnє that makes vaccination "readable" in humans. On March 26, 2020, Microsoft filed an international patent number 060606 22, which goes even further. In this patent, a "foreign body", which can contact a computer server, is placed in the human body through a vaccination or other means. Given the number of this patent, there should be no doubt in anyone's mind as to who is ultimately behind the "pandemic" and the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє. Making the vaccination "readable" would accomplish what the Scriptures speak of, namely, that only he who has the mark on his hand or forehead can buy or sell. So, for example, if the sensor on the front door of a grocery store detects that a person is not ναccιnαted, the door will remain closed. But why is this verifiability necessary? Because there will always be doctors who will issue a certificate stating that a person is ναccιnαted even if they are not. States will certainly not allow us this loophole.

e) Does this ναccιnє cause infertility in women?
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr Michael Yeadon, former research director at pfιzєr, have asked regulatory authorities to immєdιαtely suspend the approval of CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnєs for the following reasons: "The ναccιnєs may introduce antibodies against the spike proteins of the SARS-CoV-2. But the spike proteins include syncytin-like proteins, which are essential for placental formation in mammals and humans alike. It is essential to rule out the possibility that a CoV-2-SARS ναccιnє will induce an immune response against syncytin-1, otherwise indefinite infertility could occur in ναccιnαted women".

III - Summary :
Considering all the above (embryonic material, genetic modification, research and development time of the ναccιnє much too short, disastrous side effects to date, deaths linked to the taking of the ναccιnє, marking and tracing, verifiability, risk of infertility, etc.), there can be, for us Catholics, faced with the CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnє, only one possible decision: categorical rejection. This ναccιnє is intrinsically evil. This ναccιnє comes from a science without conscience, that is to say a science without God, which does not care the least about natural laws and which brazenly and arrogantly transgresses all the limits set by God.
Whoever voluntarily allows himself to be injected with this ναccιnє accepts on the one hand this science without conscience and on the other hand the satanic and dictatorial system (060606), which is reshaping the world in its own way. Faith in the Son of God and his Church has no place there and his natural laws are being transformed into their opposite (see gender theory and much more). Thus by the mass vaccination of the entire world population, people are to be given a satanic "baptism", so to speak.
This means that there can be no valid reason to accept this ναccιnє (even if it meant that the father would lose his job, the mortgage on the house could no longer be paid off, the family would lose everything and have to go begging to survive). It is in this sense that Auxiliary Bishop Schneider expressed himself in an interview on December 18, 2020: "I am convinced that there will be a large, perhaps not so large, but a considerable number of ordinary people, not so many clerics and not so many intellectuals, but simple people, mothers, simple grandmothers and good young people, who will go to prison, who will not accept this ναccιnє, and who will lose their short earthly lives there.
We live in very troubled times. But this fact gives us the opportunity to test our fidelity to God, who, if we stand firm, will reward us with a generosity that we cannot conceive of here on earth.
We may even receive the grace to become martyrs:
- like St. John the Baptist who cried out to Herod: "You have no right! »
- like the Christians of the first centuries who refused to burn incense to idols,
- like the Christians under the communist regimes, who were sent to the gulags,
- like the Catholics under the nαzι regime, who had to suffer severe reprisals or were even killed.
Today's enemy stands before us not as an idol, not with a machine gun, but as a dose of anti-divine ναccιnє that transgresses all the laws of nature, under the pretext of saving us and helping us. It is hard to think of a more brilliant plan (in the satanic sense of the word).
This is why :
Let's stop harping on in the liberal way: “fetuses are distant,” “the modification of our DNA is not proven,” “marking and traceability is only a cօռspιʀαcʏ theory.”
Instead, let us begin today with the daily prayer of supplication to ask for the graces of greater fidelity and firmness.
He who perseveres to the end will be saved.
The time of tribulation will not last forever.
God will intervene and humble his enemies.
Fr. Peter Lang, January 2021

Notes:
1 See WHO: Impfung wird die alte Normalität nicht zurückbringen https://www.wochenblick.at/who-impfung-wird-die-alte-normalitaet-nicht-zurueckbringen/
2 See Arte: Profiteure der Angst - Das Geschäft mit der Schweinegrippe (2009) https://youtu.be/LjNiSAUKnAQ
3 See LifeSiteNews: σbαmα Admin backing Ebola ναccιnєs using aborted baby cell lines (2014), https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/σbαmα-admin-backing-ebola-ναccιnєs-using-aborted-baby-cell-lines
4 See CNA Deutsch: Zika-Virus und Schwangere: ist Abtreibung eine Lösung? (2016), https://de.catholicnewsagency.com/story/zoka-virus-und-schwangere-ist-abtreibung-die-lösung-0458
5 See Süddeutsche Zeitung: Millionen Impfdosen übrig (2010), https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/schweinegrippe-milionen-impfdosen-uebrig-1.987098.
6 (Annotation added by the translators) Cf. France Soir: ""PCR test goes to court": in Portugal, but also in Germany and many other countries" (November 2020), https://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/le-test-pcr-va-au-tribunal-au-Portugal-mais-aussi-en-allemagne-et-dans-de-nombreux
7 (Annotation added by translators) See CDC : (...) recovered patients can continue to have SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in their upper respiratory specimens for up to 12 weeks (...); For persons previously diagnosed with symptomatic CÖVÌD-19 who remain asymptomatic after recovery, retesting is not recommended within 3 months (...); etc. https://www.cdc.gov/cσɾσnαvιɾυs/2019-ncov/hcp/duration-isolation.html
8 (Annotation added by translators) Cf. @FrankfurtZack: False positives: a ƚwιƚƚeɾ story (2020), https://mobile.ƚwιƚƚeɾ.com/FrankfurtZack/status/1299762933073838082
9 (Specified by the translators) STIKO (Standing Committee on Immunization at the Robert Koch Institute - Berlin) https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Kommissionen/STIKO/Empfehlungen/Impfemfehlungen_node.html
10 (Specified by the translators) IQWiG (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, literally Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare - Cologne)
https://www.iqwig.de
11 (Specified by the translators) Zentrale Ethikkommission (ZEKO, literally Central Ethical Committee - Berlin) https://www.zentraleethikkommission.de
12 (Annotation added by the translators) The mєdια in the pay and the boot of communist mundialism have - as usual - engaged in a gigantic war of disinformation, this time using instruments of sophistry such as - among others - "cօռspιʀαcʏ theory", ... "fake news", "intox" or calling them "hurluberlus" (...) all ideas, statements of fact, individuals and groups of individuals, who denounce the CÖVÌD-19 "pandemic", the ναccιnє or any other fact that could slow down the projects of their masters. For example, France Info: "Questioned by Chinese television CGTN (!), вιℓℓ gαтeѕ was philosophical: "I would say it's ironic that you would (target) someone who is doing his best to prepare the world and who is investing, in my case, billions of dollars (...) and who is really trying to solve infectious diseases on a large scale - including those that cause pandemics (...) we're in a crazy situation, so there are going to be crazy rumors". This excerpt speaks for itself: would it be madness today to say that those who control the mєdια, control opinion, or those who control money control the laws? - Despite all its evils, Providence has allowed the Internet, just as it once allowed the printing press: therefore, whoever takes the time necessary to search for the truth about this information (seriously, that is, objectively and honestly) cannot fail to arrive at conclusions similar or close to those (very partially) exposed here. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/maladie/cσɾσnαvιɾυs/cσɾσnαvιɾυs-comment-bill-gates-est-devenu-la-cible-favorite-des-complotistes-des-antivaccins-et-de-l-extreme-droite-3925815.amp
13 See Nordkurier: Schweiz: Behörde bestätigt Todesfall nach Corona-Impfung https://www.nordkurier.de/polotik-und-wirtschaft/behoerde-bestaetigt-todesfall-nach-corona-impfung-3041903612.html
14 See Wochenblick: Skandal in Norwegens Pflegeheimen: 23 Tote nach CÖVÌD-Impfungen https://www.wochenblick.at/skandal-in-norwegens-pflegeheimen-23-tote-nach-CÖVÌD-impfungen/
15 See Gloria TV: Nach 30 Jahren Forschung (seit 1990) wurde nie eine RNA-Impfung... https://gloria.tv/post/2MMBpnyJ8y1g4ERMj2xq6Mt8
16 (Annotation added by the translators) (in bold in the original text): "No mRNA immunotherapy has been approved, and none may ever be approved. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risks, due to the novel and unprecedent nature of this new category of therapeutics. https://investors.biontech.de/static-files/c0c089c7-059c-44ba-bffa-3ea2dd5cc4e9
In the BioNtech 2020 annual report to investors (in German), page 33, it states: "Together with pfιzєr, Genevant and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation we are also using our technology beyond oncology for the treatment of rare diseases and infections such as influenza, HIV and tuberculosis. But aren't we in a "crazy situation" (12)? https://investors.biontech.de/static-files/2fe81830-7ae3-498b-b862-2e0a79221702
17 See Wodarg.com: Neue Bedenken über die berichteten Wirksamkeitsergebnisse der CÖVÌD-19-Impfstoffstudien (2020) https://www.wodarg.com/impfen/
18 See Pontifical Academy for Life (Rome) http://www.academyforlife.va/content/pav/en/the-academy/activity-academy/note-vaccini.html.
19 (Annotation added by the translators) In response, the mєdια at the service (whether they are aware of it or not) of communist globalism describe these prelates as "conspirators allied with groups of pseudo-scientists, anti-ναccιnє and other esoteric groups". As you will see, apart from trying to discredit their opponents, they never seriously succeed in demonstrating that the "hurluberlus" are wrong; and for good reason: it is difficult to object to a truth with a serious argument. - Cf. Katolisch.de : Erzbischof Vigano: Vom Nuntius zum Verschwörungstheoretiker (2020) https://www.katholisch.de/artikel/25438-erzbischof-vigano-vom-nuntius-zum-verschwoerungstheoretiker
20 (Annotation added by translators) LifeSiteNews: Interview with Pamela Acker, a ναccιnє specialist, on CÖVÌD-19 ναccιnєs and the use of problem cells from aborted babies for their development; translated from English by Jeanne Smits (2021) https://leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com/2021/01une-specialiste-des-vaccins-pamela.html?m=1
21 (Annotation added by translators): Benoit & I: Save our children from the health dictatorship! : Translation of Bishop Vigano's letter (15 August 2020) http://www.benoit-et-moi.fr/2020/2020/08/19/sauvons-nos-enfants-de-la-dictature-sanitaire/?fbclid=IwAR2PteGANd_AkL4f4TdOxGWZR-TV1FMrP0Dyn649mfLtTsm2c1KAMJ9-18
22 (Annotation added by translators): Google Patents https://patents.google.com/patent/WO20200060606A1/
23 See LifeSiteNews: Bishop Schneider explains why Christians must never take abortion-tainted CÖVÌD ναccιnє (2020), https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/pro-death-world-powers-wish-to-use-ναccιnє-mandates-to-force-cooperation-with-abortion.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'? (Read 2680 times)

Sgt Rock USMC

Re: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'?

Stubborn

Re: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'?

Sgt Rock USMC

Re: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'?

NatusAdMaiora

Re: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'?

B from A

Re: Official position of the FSSPX on the 'Vaccine'?