Author Topic: NOT A RUMOR (Read 46883 times)

Stubborn · « **Reply #35 on:** December 07, 2015, 09:41:36 AM »

For whatever it's worth, according to their own website the SSPX Stats for 2012 say 25,000 in the USA and 600,000 total.

Benzel · « **Reply #36 on:** December 07, 2015, 10:06:43 AM »

Quote from: Nishant

This is amusing. For the benefit of posters who may not know, AJNC has publicly accused me of being Fr. Laisney. Now, I respect Fr. Laisney, so I can't say I'm offended; on the contrary, he's a good and faithful priest, so I'm honored. But the truth, of course, is that Nishant is my real name, (Matthew and a few others know my second name), I'm not Fr. Laisney, and a moment's thought, or a simple PM to Matthew or even to me would have confirmed that for "AJNC". But since he insists on talking past me, let me tell him, I am not a priest, though I seriously discerned a vocation to the priesthood under the guidance of a traditional priest about 2 years ago. I - like many others here who have clearly stated as much - owe a lot the SSPX and I'm sure would, if we were so called, be filled with measureless gratitude to serve or have one of our sons serve God in the traditional Catholic priesthood in an SSPX seminary.

I don't have the statistics at hand, though I vaguely recall seeing it cited somewhere as an estimated 1.2 million traditional Catholics who depend on the Society's worldwide apostolate. That's probably an inflated number; I don't have the source at hand and will have to recheck it; I apologize if I was mistaken on that. I am not, however, any of those other things you accused me of being, but have never claimed to be and so don't have to answer that.

THANK YOU, DEAR NISHANT.

TKGS · « **Reply #37 on:** December 07, 2015, 10:07:17 AM »

Quote from: Nishant

But the truth, of course, is that Nishant is my real name...

Since we have time before announcement time and there's really nothing more to hash over until tomorrow, I was wondering, Nishant, if you would shed more light on that name. I am curious as I've never heard such a name before. Would you tell us the origin of that name? Is it a derivative of something? I am unable to identify a saint with the name, so I am truly interested in knowing more. Thanks in advance.

Benzel · « **Reply #38 on:** December 07, 2015, 10:10:32 AM »

Quote from: Stubborn

For whatever it's worth, according to their own website the SSPX Stats for 2012 say 25,000 in the USA and 600,000 total.

Thank you dear Stubborn.
It seems that the SSPX lies.

AJNC · « **Reply #39 on:** December 07, 2015, 11:23:17 AM »

Quote from: Nishant

This is amusing. For the benefit of posters who may not know, AJNC has publicly accused me of being Fr. Laisney. Now, I respect Fr. Laisney, so I can't say I'm offended; on the contrary, he's a good and faithful priest, so I'm honored. But the truth, of course, is that Nishant is my real name, (Matthew and a few others know my second name), I'm not Fr. Laisney, and a moment's thought, or a simple PM to Matthew or even to me would have confirmed that for "AJNC". But since he insists on talking past me, let me tell him, I am not a priest, though I seriously discerned a vocation to the priesthood under the guidance of a traditional priest about 2 years ago. I - like many others here who have clearly stated as much - owe a lot the SSPX and I'm sure would, if we were so called, be filled with measureless gratitude to serve or have one of our sons serve God in the traditional Catholic priesthood in an SSPX seminary.

I don't have the statistics at hand, though I vaguely recall seeing it cited somewhere as an estimated 1.2 million traditional Catholics who depend on the Society's worldwide apostolate. That's probably an inflated number; I don't have the source at hand and will have to recheck it; I apologize if I was mistaken on that. I am not, however, any of those other things you accused me of being, but have never claimed to be and so don't have to answer that.

It would be insane of me to insist that you are someone you insist that you are not!. So I apologize unreservedly for claiming that you are Fr Laisney. The only explanation I have is that I have heard Fr Laisney speak about an accord with Newrome and I concluded that you and him are one and the same person. Once again, I'm sorry!