Constance, for all the pain this has put you through, I dearly hope your testimony will plunge the long-awaited stake through the rancid vampiric heart of the Boston operation.

I wish you had been more prudent in whom you chose to put all your trust in, but you've already admitted to this. May you have all of God's blessings moving forward. You must have already recieved a generous amount in order to get out of that situation!

First, what a bunch of money-grubbing con men!

17.    Fr. Pfeiffer agrees to take care of Agatha’s 30 days of Masses for the repose of her soul, and thousands of dollars are provided for this purpose with a written intention enclosed.  Many from the Catholic community (N.O) also provide Mass stipends for the repose of Agatha’s soul with written intentions enclosed.  

45.    Fr. Pfeiffer asked me to meet with him in the Priory.  He asked me if I was planning to pursue consecrated life.  I told him yes.  He was on his way out and we continued talking as he came next to the car. With Pablo there, he asked me to accompany him in the car on the way to the airport to further discuss the convent.  I had food in the oven for Holy Thursday Feast and there wasn’t enough time.  He asked me if I could take more time off and return in a couple of weeks to find a house for a convent.  I told him I could not do that because I had appointments booked and if we were to proceed, I would have to return and put my business up for sale in order to get the best price for it and have a little to work with.  He agreed with me that I should proceed and sell my business.  

60. Pablo makes further requests for a dowry of about $25,000.00 (my life savings), to be given to C.A. I do advise him that this is all I have and that I have taxes to pay. I tell him that I have been poor all of my life struggling to make ends meet.

New tagline for the Boston Seminary: "Get raped, we'll make your bed!"

46.    (Pablo) quickly informed me: “I could tell you weren’t a virgin from the moment you arrived.  I could smell it”.  

47.   Pablo states:  “I bugged the confessional”.

68.    Later, Pablo takes me to the trailer.  It is dusk now and Pablo has informed me that I will start cooking the next day at noon.  I am anxious to get him out of my way.  I have asked him nicely to “leave me alone to do my work in the kitchen”.  He agrees to this request.  He enters the trailer. The lights are on, the blinds are up facing the grounds, and the door remains open.  He tells me now that I should make the bed.  I resist.  He demands that the bed be made because he wants to be sure that the linens are on it because he doesn’t want me to put my sleeping bag on top of the bare mattress.  I remember how he had the seminarians do this on my previous visit, so I just comply. I feel stupid.  He barks orders at me to “make the bed, tuck this corner, that corner”, as if I don’t know how to make a bed.  I just want to get rid of him.  He is so bossy as he watches me make the bed, crawling from one side to the other in the small space.  He stands at the foot of the bed. I complete the task and get by him and move quickly to the open door in the living room. He steps in front of me with his back to the open door and says “now give me a hug” as he reaches around my neck.  I keep my body away from him as he tries to pull me into him.  I slip away and he only touches me around my neck. He is carrying on about all the attacks I will be getting from the “enemy” and that he will protect me.  It is all happening quickly and I don’t have time to process.  Now he turns his back to me facing the door as if he is going to leave.  He is repeating “just stay close, just stay close” as he has his head turned to see me.  I am bewildered listening to his talk and not knowing what in the world he is thinking.  On his final “just stay close”, he backs into me and very intentionally leans on my breast.  I run out of the trailer, nervous and unsure of what just happened and very uncomfortable.  Later processing the event, I realize that he fully intended on touching me there, and when I wouldn’t embrace him, he proceed to break down that barrier in another manner.  I ran out of the trailer ahead of him.  He quickly followed saying “Just calm down, just calm down”, repeating this 4 or 5 times.  I said nothing, but I was very upset and he knew it.  I have been previously abused in my youth.  I have not been touched in any way by a man in decades.  This was a strong violation to me and greatly upset me.  

73.    Pablo comes to me and tells me “Fr. is going to beat you up”.  I am perplexed.  I have given up my livelihood.  I am working hard.  ?

Santiago's death is looking more like a judgement from God on the Hernandez family because of this cancerous human being!

43.    I listened as Pablo stated with much emotion:  “I hate Traditional Catholics. I hate them, I hate them, I hate them, with a pure pure hatred”.  Yes, he was serious.  Yes, he meant it.  It was clear and strongly stated.  

85.    Pablo often entices the seminarians to sin.  He has repeatedly expressed to me his dislike of us and them.  When the Fathers are away he will bark out orders to go clean the fields on a Sunday, or eat meat on a Friday.  He will get into disputes about the commandments.  He calls the seminarians “elitist”, and “stupid”.  

86.    Fr. Pfeiffer repeatedly calls the seminarians “idiots”.  He states wives are “battleaxes”.  “Women drag you down” etc., etc.….

Pfeiffablo revealing their true feelings towards their charges!

And now, absolute proof that Fr. Hewko's judgement is worth less than old horse fertilizer:

30.    Fr. Hewko responds by email deferring my concerns to Fr. Pfeiffer.  He states that he believes that Fr. Voigt did curse Santiago and that Pablo is overwhelmed with all the cooking he has to do.  He states that “my concerns are not reason enough to be deprived of the graces I would receive in Holy Week.”

Wh-what? I wonder where they got the time to figure this one out! Perhaps it was one of Pablo's lay exorcisms?

Finally, he reveals himself as a galactic mortal sinner in now a very public scandal of epic proportions. Acting surprised doesn't cut it when all you have to say is "Pfeiffer trusts him." Take your medicine like a man, Hewko!

88.    May 16th, I awaited Fr. Hewko’s return before my final departure out of this nightmare.  
 a)    He confirmed that, contrary to Fr. Pfeiffer’s report, Fr. Pfeiffer did get the proposal for the Carmelite Convent and that “they read it together”.  He said he couldn’t understand Fr Pfeiffer’s accusations of me having my own agenda.  
 b)    When I told him that Pablo had inappropriately touched me, he stated that I “should have slapped him”.  (Having been on the receiving end many blows from my previously abusive husband, I am not in the practice of “asking for it”).  He was surprised to learn that I had discussed this with Fr. Pfeiffer without any reaction on his part.  
 c)    I told him about the reports of fraud at Western Union. He acted surprised.  
 d)    I told him about the appearance of an unholy relationship between the woman across the street, her family and Pablo.  
 e)    I told him that he was complicit as this was occurring right under his nose.  
 f)    I told him that Pablo is stealing from the donations of the faithful and again this is occurring with his cooperation.  
 g)    I repeated my accusations to him as he kept requesting further clarification.  
 h)    He kept asking me if Pablo was the problem – to which I clarified that the greater problem was Fr. Pfeiffer’s unholy attachment to Pablo.  
 i)    Again, I repeated this to him as he kept asking me to.  
 j)    His final response was:  Fr. Pfeiffer trusts him”.  “He does a lot of work around here”.  
k)    I asked for his blessing and departed, begging him to think.

Defrock you, Hewko!

May he desacralized as soon as humanly possible.

87.    I met with Manual Chavez who states he has visited the seminary on 4 occasions to do the food preparation.  I share with him that I followed his blog where he indicated that there were no problems there in Kentucky or in the kitchen there.  Then he proceeded to tell me that “at least 1/3 of the food that he purchased went out the door”.  He also said that he had prepared a meal and Pablo threw the entire thing in the garbage right in front of him.  We shared the mismanagement of the entire seminary and our negative experiences in the kitchen.  I later wondered why he didn’t tell the truth in his 30 day blog.

 

We all wondered on that one!  

14.    I read the blog my Manual Chavez as he reports on daily life cooking at the Seminary. He reports what sounds like a normal seminary without any apparent difficulties.

 

Look how early this shows up on this list of horrors! I want you to take that in Manuel. I expect you to apologize to this entire forum for your role as an accessory for Boston. No more excuses, accept your responsibility like a man.

Don't give me any equivocating garbage about "experience" or "it could have been handled better". You might have the eyesight of a worm, but you better develop a spine real soon!

a.    The primary problem is the level cooperation in grave sin by both Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko who hold a much greater responsibility than the public sins of Pablo.

 

 :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:

There is only one response to these outrages and that is forceful action.

Croixalist, I reacted the same way. Everyone's beloved Fr. Hewko also believes the ____ against Fr. Voigt. Give me a break!

What is wrong with him? He is complicit in grave sins, which itself is a grave sin! Come on, we're talking about basic Catholic doctrine here. Isn't that what even Fr. Pfeiffer wants us all to concern ourselves primarily with?

Doctrine (i.e., Faith) is important, but so is "goodness and lack of grave disorder and grave sin" (i.e., Charity). In heaven, there is not only truth (true doctrine) but order and goodness (charity). Both are necessary. Even if it could be said that the Boston, KY group has the Faith 100% (which I have my serious doubts), it wouldn't matter if they were this messed-up in the order of grace and charity. What good is having the Faith if you are living in a depraved state, in the depths of mortal sin? Newsflash: Faith without Sanctifying Grace won't save you!

Now if the two fathers really believed that charge against Fr. Voigt, they should be doing all they can to "unmask" him. But they're not. They are mostly silent, mostly just consenting to Pablo's videos and website trash.

It's actually quite disturbing that they don't talk about it more in sermons. What, aren't they sure? If they're not sure, they shouldn't be believing such nonsense, or at least say, "I doubt it" or "I'm not sure".

Think of it this way -- would it be appropriate or charitable for me to say, "I don't know if you are a pedophile or not. I'll have to hope you're not." You wouldn't talk to me any more. But more than that, it wouldn't be charitable to entertain such doubts or beliefs about you, without GOOD REASON. Because that's a serious charge there he's casually throwing around like a live grenade. You don't just lightly assign such grave evil to a fellow priest, unless reality FORCES you to. You don't just take it as Gospel truth on Pablo's say-so.

You might believe a priest got a parking ticket on another man's word. Or that he lost his temper. Or that he cut someone off in traffic. But something as grave as summoning a demon, cursing someone and causing his death, or engaging in witchcraft -- I'd need more than hearsay to convince me, especially when the "offender" in question is a good priest with a spotless reputation!!!

But honestly, I don't understand what hypnosis or demonic influence could convince them that Fr. Voigt is guilty of cursing a young man unto death. They lived and worked with him, much more than I ever have!  They should know better. Pablo, on the other hand, is much more likely to be dabbling in the devil and curses. That is much more likely.

Have the 2 fathers lost their blessed, ever-loving minds? Are they under hypnosis? Or what?

Croixalist, I reacted the same way. Everyone's beloved Fr. Hewko also believes the ____ against Fr. Voigt. Give me a break!

What is wrong with him? He is complicit in grave sins, which itself is a grave sin! Come on, we're talking about basic Catholic doctrine here. Isn't that what even Fr. Pfeiffer wants us all to concern ourselves primarily with?

Doctrine (i.e., Faith) is important, but so is "goodness and lack of grave disorder and grave sin" (i.e., Charity). In heaven, there is not only truth (true doctrine) but order and goodness (charity). Both are necessary. Even if it could be said that the Boston, KY group has the Faith 100% (which I have my serious doubts), it wouldn't matter if they were this messed-up in the order of grace and charity. What good is having the Faith if you are living in a depraved state, in the depths of mortal sin? Newsflash: Faith without Sanctifying Grace won't save you!

Now if the two fathers really believed that charge against Fr. Voigt, they should be doing all they can to "unmask" him. But they're not. They are mostly silent, mostly just consenting to Pablo's videos and website trash.

It's actually quite disturbing that they don't talk about it more in sermons. What, aren't they sure? If they're not sure, they shouldn't be believing such nonsense, or at least say, "I doubt it" or "I'm not sure".

Think of it this way -- would it be appropriate or charitable for me to say, "I don't know if you are a pedophile or not. I'll have to hope you're not." You wouldn't talk to me any more. But more than that, it wouldn't be charitable to entertain such doubts or beliefs about you, without GOOD REASON. Because that's a serious charge there he's casually throwing around like a live grenade. You don't just lightly assign such grave evil to a fellow priest, unless reality FORCES you to. You don't just take it as Gospel truth on Pablo's say-so.

You might believe a priest got a parking ticket on another man's word. Or that he lost his temper. Or that he cut someone off in traffic. But something as grave as summoning a demon, cursing someone and causing his death, or engaging in witchcraft -- I'd need more than hearsay to convince me, especially when the "offender" in question is a good priest with a spotless reputation!!!

But honestly, I don't understand what hypnosis or demonic influence could convince them that Fr. Voigt is guilty of cursing a young man unto death. They lived and worked with him, much more than I ever have!  They should know better. Pablo, on the other hand, is much more likely to be dabbling in the devil and curses. That is much more likely.

Have the 2 fathers lost their blessed, ever-loving minds? Are they under hypnosis? Or what?

Stockholm.

You gave me an idea, Croixalist.

They don't attack such things head-on, because they know they won't win. They only say it privately, to people who will believe them.

Just like the SSPX doesn't have a webpage that says "Don't go to St. Dominic's Chapel" because people might Google the chapel and find out about it, or find out that it's actually very Catholic. What they do instead is hit people in the confessional, advise people privately, whenever they have a strong influence. Just like a gang, they are strong when accompanied by their "brothers", but are quite weak when you catch them one-on-one.

They don't like to pick on someone their own size.

When I walked among those who still attend the SSPX chapel in San Antonio, everyone left me alone completely. I think I managed to get 2 people to speak their mind. Everyone else either ignored me, or talked pleasantries.

It's because I know what's going on, and I can handle all their ridiculous arguments. By "handle" I mean "take them apart like a cheap watch".

For example, the canard that Bishop Faure's consecration wasn't good, but the 1988 consecrations were good. I love to hear them try to explain that one. "Um...there weren't ENOUGH people at +Faure's consecration....I wasn't personally invited...there weren't any trumpets at the ceremony..."

But if a parishioner tries to go to "both chapels" (the Resistance as well as the SSPX chapel), for whatever reason, then people give them the business and try to bully them.

Come on, ye men of bad will! If you truly believe what you're saying, you should say it to me as well, come what may! Or do you only bully the weak and easily-influenced?

Alas, I have seen this pattern of degradation into cult several times first hand.

Typically it starts with the bunker mentality that there are only about 3 or 4 actual true Catholics left in the world.  Perhaps it starts with a genuine conviction, but it then very quickly gets into a feedback loop with pride and a sense of self-importance.  Such people begin to think that they are special chosen ones whom God has selected as the top 3 or 4 people in all of humanity to save the Church.  Thus, being the last of the Church, they feel the need to fly all over the world providing Masses and Sacraments because they alone are the source of the only truly good and pleasing Masses and Sacraments left in this world.  They convince themselves that they are doing it for the faith and for the good of the faithful, and that allows the underlying ego and pride to be hidden.  This excessive frenetic activity then leads to a loss of grounding in prayer and true contemplative spirituality.  It's a deep vicious spiral.  Bunker mentality + pride -> cult.  As the cult leaders then start convincing people that they are the last bastion of Catholicism left in the world, followers start upending their lives, selling their possessions, undertaking all manner of radical and imprudent life changes in order to pursue these phantoms and to fight windmills.  Thank God that Constance was spared this, most likely because she kept praying and contemplating during her trials.

I pointed out from the onset in listening to Father Pfeiffer's sermons (very shortly after they started up with The Resistance) that I detected a tone which suggested delusions of grandeur.  I've seen this before and recognized the danger.  Unfortunately, it has played out accordingly.  Indeed, I know it first hand, as I myself have gone through this process.  So I know whereof I speak.  Only a strong slap in the face from the loving hand of God snapped me out of it.  At one point I recognized, in my dogmatic sedevacantist days, that it was utterly preposterous to think that I was one of only a few dozen Catholics left in the world.  That in turn made me start re-examining anew all the false principles that led me down that path in the first place.

Father needs to rediscover humility and only do what he can do well without compromising his prayer life and spirituality.  Stop the seminary.  Stop flying around the world (unless there's an actual urgent need) .... especially in areas that are already served by the SSPX or other decent groups.  Just serve one or two small chapels, just a few dozen faithful perhaps, and serve them WELL.  Return to a life of contemplation and prayer.  Without that silent humble listening to God, one cannot be guided by the Holy Spirit in understanding what God wants for him, but will very quickly follow his own devices ... into which the devil will immediately inject his own nefarious suggestions.  And the spirits cannot be discerned due to all the noise, so that people cannot tell which are good and which are bad impulses.  Go small, return to prayer and contemplation, rediscover humility.  Then and only then will they find their way back.  Unfortunately, once people get to this point, it usually requires a harsh intervention or wake-up call from God ... usually in the form of a deep personal crisis or tragedy.  I therefore expect a grave moral fall.

I know Father Pfeiffer from the seminary and liked him a great deal there.  So I lament what has happened.  I keep him in my prayers.

Alas, I have seen this pattern of degradation into cult several times first hand.

Typically it starts with the bunker mentality that there are only about 3 or 4 actual true Catholics left in the world.  Perhaps it starts with a genuine conviction, but it then very quickly gets into a feedback loop with pride and a sense of self-importance.  Such people begin to think that they are special chosen ones whom God has selected as the top 3 or 4 people in all of humanity to save the Church.  Thus, being the last of the Church, they feel the need to fly all over the world providing Masses and Sacraments because they alone are the source of the only truly good and pleasing Masses and Sacraments left in this world.  They convince themselves that they are doing it for the faith and for the good of the faithful, and that allows the underlying ego and pride to be hidden.  This excessive frenetic activity then leads to a loss of grounding in prayer and true contemplative spirituality.  It's a deep vicious spiral.  Bunker mentality + pride -> cult.  As the cult leaders then start convincing people that they are the last bastion of Catholicism left in the world, followers start upending their lives, selling their possessions, undertaking all manner of radical and imprudent life changes in order to pursue these phantoms and to fight windmills.  Thank God that Constance was spared this, most likely because she kept praying and contemplating during her trials.

I pointed out from the onset in listening to Father Pfeiffer's sermons (very shortly after they started up with The Resistance) that I detected a tone which suggested delusions of grandeur.  I've seen this before and recognized the danger.  Unfortunately, it has played out accordingly.  Indeed, I know it first hand, as I myself have gone through this process.  So I know whereof I speak.  Only a strong slap in the face from the loving hand of God snapped me out of it.  At one point I recognized, in my dogmatic sedevacantist days, that it was utterly preposterous to think that I was one of only a few dozen Catholics left in the world.  That in turn made me start re-examining anew all the false principles that led me down that path in the first place.

Father needs to rediscover humility and only do what he can do well without compromising his prayer life and spirituality.  Stop the seminary.  Stop flying around the world (unless there's an actual urgent need) .... especially in areas that are already served by the SSPX or other decent groups.  Just serve one or two small chapels, just a few dozen faithful perhaps, and serve them WELL.  Return to a life of contemplation and prayer.  Without that silent humble listening to God, one cannot be guided by the Holy Spirit in understanding what God wants for him, but will very quickly follow his own devices ... into which the devil will immediately inject his own nefarious suggestions.  And the spirits cannot be discerned due to all the noise, so that people cannot tell which are good and which are bad impulses.  Go small, return to prayer and contemplation, rediscover humility.  Then and only then will they find their way back.  Unfortunately, once people get to this point, it usually requires a harsh intervention or wake-up call from God ... usually in the form of a deep personal crisis or tragedy.  I therefore expect a grave moral fall.

I know Father Pfeiffer from the seminary and liked him a great deal there.  So I lament what has happened.  I keep him in my prayers.

Great post. :applause:

The anti-Modernist popes always condemn activism and for good reason.  As you pointed out activism can conceal a spirit of pride.  The Pfeiffer cult also has a gnostic spirit evidenced by the worship of intellect displayed by some of its most ardent supporters.  Notice how they dismiss the manifestly evil acts of the priests and their boss as irrelevant.  Or they are praised as "good works".  Works without faith are dead.

But let's connect some dots here. Just two dots in particular.

Pablo is known to be a diabolical liar. Just look at what he has said about Fr. Voigt.

Do you imagine he wouldn't come up with outrageous things against Fr. Hewko, and even suggest them to Fr. Hewko, while hinting that he will "go public" with those charges unless he cooperates?

Because Pablo is CERTAINLY not above making ridiculous, slanderous charges against the innocent. He has proven this time and again.

So the idea of blackmail seems quite possible.


But regardless of any coercion, the fact remains that Fr. Hewko has compromised BIG TIME and is committing sin by his participation/defense/silence of the evils going on all around him.

As we tell our children, "So-and-so can't MAKE you do anything. The devil can't make you do it, your sister can't make you do it, YOU are the guilty one who is going to be punished."

Fr Hewko and Fr Pfeiffer are one more example for me of making sure I do not think too highly of anyone, (including self). That doesn't mean I think badly of everyone but I mean that we always have to remember that everyone is human and everyone has an Achilles heel or two that they might not always defend well enough. We thank God for the good examples around us, we need them and we are strengthened and edified by them, but we cannot hang the life of our Faith on them or we will surely lose our Faith.

Coming of age in the SSPX, there were several large, high profile families with multiple priestly and religious vocations, that "everyone" seemed to know and love. Every one of them has since suffered through acute, public scandal and humiliation that has split them down the middle. Now it's the Pfeiffers and Fr Hewko.

I feel for the families because it is not easy to come back from public scandal. You find out the hard way who your friends are. When everyone else has forgotten, you are left to pick up the pieces and find some version of new normal in the family. Things are never the same and there's ongoing heartache and worry over one or other parent/sibling. As heartbreaking as it is, I trust that somewhere in all of it there are souls who are being sanctified and brought closer to God through these severe trials. Satan is having a heyday in KY but I think it is important to remember that God will bring a greater good out of it somehow, even if it's private and we never know what or who.