This is what I think is tragic:

"16.    Based on the information coming in my direction, I became convinced that there is a persecution against the Boston KY effort, against Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko.  I base this on the evidence of service to Agatha by the Fathers, and the apparent wavering of Bsp Williamson, and the evident malice in many writings on Cathinfo.org.  I remain very grateful to the OLMC Boston Fathers and seminarians."

You seem to be taking your world being turned topsy-turvy rather well, Constance.

If roles were reversed, and I found out tomorrow that Fr. Pfeiffer was the "good guy" all along and that +Williamson, Fr. Voigt, Fr. Zendejas, Fr. Garcia, etc. were the "bad guys" all along, I'd be questioning my own name. I'd be a basket case. After all, my very perception of reality would have been proven to be completely false. I wouldn't be able to trust my own eyes or ears anymore. My whole reality would have just been inverted -- everything I knew to be true would have been proven false, and vice-versa. I'd probably go insane.

(NOTE: I'm talking about being bad or good "all along" rather than going bad at some point. I was with the SSPX for years, and I had no problem joining the Resistance when the SSPX started to stray. But the old SSPX I supported WAS the good guy at the time, so that didn't pose any problem. Human beings are frail; human institutions fail. Also, I supported Fr. Pfeiffer in 2012-2013 but that was before his red-lighting, Ambrose Moran, Fr. Tetherow, attack-the-whole-Resistance, fratricidal, OLMC Seminary days. I stopped supporting him as soon as he BECAME a bad guy)

How could I calmly accept the truth that the evil cesspit of filth (Jєωιѕн Hollywood) is actually a vehicle of God's own truth? I don't think I could. But you have essentially made that move by embracing CathInfo.

You must have believed we were the worst Catholics in the world.

Like I said, you are taking this rather well. The only explanation I can come up with is that you knew in your heart all along that we might be telling the truth here. You must have had your doubts early on, or at least for several weeks now. You must be somewhat acclimated or "used to the idea" by now.

This is what I think is tragic:

"16.    Based on the information coming in my direction, I became convinced that there is a persecution against the Boston KY effort, against Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko.  I base this on the evidence of service to Agatha by the Fathers, and the apparent wavering of Bsp Williamson, and the evident malice in many writings on Cathinfo.org.  I remain very grateful to the OLMC Boston Fathers and seminarians."

You seem to be taking your world being turned topsy-turvy rather well, Constance.

If roles were reversed, and I found out tomorrow that Fr. Pfeiffer was the "good guy" all along and that +Williamson, Fr. Voigt, Fr. Zendejas, Fr. Garcia, etc. were the "bad guys" all along, I'd be questioning my own name. I'd be a basket case. After all, my very perception of reality would have been proven to be completely false. I wouldn't be able to trust my own eyes or ears anymore. My whole reality would have just been inverted -- everything I knew to be true would have been proven false, and vice-versa. I'd probably go insane.

(NOTE: I'm talking about being bad or good "all along" rather than going bad at some point. I was with the SSPX for years, and I had no problem joining the Resistance when the SSPX started to stray. But the old SSPX I supported WAS the good guy at the time, so that didn't pose any problem. Human beings are frail; human institutions fail. Also, I supported Fr. Pfeiffer in 2012-2013 but that was before his red-lighting, Ambrose Moran, Fr. Tetherow, attack-the-whole-Resistance, fratricidal, OLMC Seminary days. I stopped supporting him as soon as he BECAME a bad guy)

How could I calmly accept the truth that the evil cesspit of filth (Jєωιѕн Hollywood) is actually a vehicle of God's own truth? I don't think I could. But you have essentially made that move by embracing CathInfo.

You must have believed we were the worst Catholics in the world.

Like I said, you are taking this rather well. The only explanation I can come up with is that you knew in your heart all along that we might be telling the truth here. You must have had your doubts early on, or at least for several weeks now. You must be somewhat acclimated or "used to the idea" by now.

Oh, that should read "I remained very grateful to the Fathers and seminarians for taking care of Agatha last rites and funeral mass & burial.  Past tense.  I was describing the point in time.  I am ashamed of them now, and embarrassed for them.  

As to the fact that they have done me great harm - I acknowledge that, but i also am comfortable with my prayers and my relationship with my Lord.

It's not the first time I have been substantially harmed by a member of the clergy.  God uses me for this for some reason.  

 "Although He slay me, yet will I trust Him".  He always takes care of me some how, although not without suffering.  

I had doubts when the SHTF initially (Fall 2015),  but Agatha's death, and subsequent new mission in my area moved me along "with them".  

Thanks for your kind words Matthew.  

Quote from: Constance

I didn't give him the money. I needed it to start the convent.  Thank God!

I'm glad that you will start a convent.

thanks for making me smile.  God Bless.

Hi Constance, as a non-dogmatic sedevacantist and a friend of Father Hewko, I am so sorry for what happened to you and I thank God you escaped that abominable place relatively unscathed.

I told Father that he should leave there, several times, but to no avail.

What I really want to see is for Martin D. to corroborate your story and then to publicly condemn Boston, KY.

Are there any REAL men left?

Speaking of MC, just within the past week I was wondering where he's gone. He hasn't posted in a while I think.

Considering he hasn't posted FOR or AGAINST Boston, KY in some time, one can only conclude he's remaining silent so he doesn't have to condemn them.

If he felt the same way as before about Boston, he would continue to post here with an optimistic tone as he had for months. Based on his behavior in the past, we can established that as his modus operandi, at least when no external coercion is applied.

He was quite the "benefit of the doubt" rose-colored glasses apologist during his posting time here. If he's given up on that, maybe he found out something that troubles him, or maybe he wants to say something but can't find the courage to do so...

Maybe me mistakenly thinks, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything." Which is ridiculous when applied to something like the Boston, KY cult, where souls are at stake and souls are in danger. Two words: public good.

Who knows? Maybe Fr. Pfeiffer/Pablo had something to do with Manuel/Martin's disappearance from CI. Isn't his brother still a seminarian? (No one has ever reported otherwise, so we have to assume his brother is still a seminarian there.) That would be a certain "leverage", would it not?

Quote from: Constance

Quote from: Recusant Sede

Hi Constance, as a non-dogmatic sedevacantist and a friend of Father Hewko, I am so sorry for what happened to you and I thank God you escaped that abominable place relatively unscathed.

I told Father that he should leave there, several times, but to no avail.

What I really want to see is for Martin D. to corroborate your story and then to publicly condemn Boston, KY.

Are there any REAL men left?

Yes, there are. No one is perfect. Men are prone to defects in action or character. Real men are not perfect, but they are nevertheless men.

I cannot disagree with anything in your letter, except for the implication that I lied or did not tell the truth in my blog. The seminary had problems, and at the time, I did not consider the problems I faced as being particularly newsworthy.

Your trials and tribulations are far worse than what I experienced.

And you should convince your brother to leave there ASAP!

Quote from: Constance

Quote from: Recusant Sede

Hi Constance, as a non-dogmatic sedevacantist and a friend of Father Hewko, I am so sorry for what happened to you and I thank God you escaped that abominable place relatively unscathed.

I told Father that he should leave there, several times, but to no avail.

What I really want to see is for Martin D. to corroborate your story and then to publicly condemn Boston, KY.

Are there any REAL men left?

Yes, there are. No one is perfect. Men are prone to defects in action or character. Real men are not perfect, but they are nevertheless men.

I cannot disagree with anything in your letter, except for the implication that I lied or did not tell the truth in my blog. The seminary had problems, and at the time, I did not consider the problems I faced as being particularly newsworthy.

Your trials and tribulations are far worse than what I experienced.

Martin, you should be ashamed of what you just wrote here.

In fairness, Martin did provide a couple of very useful videos during his 30-day stay at the seminary.