We were talking about bishop Williamson not having a "plan of action", and about our own "plan of action". As far as I am aware, nobody in the Resistance is associating with these characters you mentioned, and neither does any of us have any control over them. They are Pfeifferite "assets" now.
Samuel, when you use the term "resistance", to whom do you refer?
I think there is confusion with that term sometimes.
There is no question as to the perversion of fr. Roberts, currently working in KY with fr. Pfeiffer at olmc, and is on circuit for them. The data is overwhelming.
There is no question as to the laicization and perversion of Mr. Cordaro who fr. Pfeiffer let say mass at olmc in KY recently. The data came from his own diocese and ex-order.
There is no question to the laicization, confession and conviction of Mr. Tetherow, who Fr. Pfeiffer referred to as "our friend", "taking care of our faithful in his neck of the woods" (or something similar).
To which bishop does a person report such "priests"?
It seems to me fr. Pfeiffer and fr. Hewko have a history of not performing their due diligence before exposing the Faithful, seminarians, and brothers to perverts and laicised priests. And once the Faithful inform fathers Pfeiffer and Hewko of such, they not only do not correct the situation but they dig their heels in and make futile attempts to defend their decision.
To which bishop do we report the actions of fr. Pfeiffer and fr. Hewko? Moran? Fr. Pfeiffer put him out of the way, temporarily, because Moran claimed jurisdiction over OLMC. Fr. Pfeiffer will NEVER work with a bishop. Ever. He may convince Moran to ordain when the time comes, as he planned to do with Fr. Mbadugha, but that is not working WITH a bishop.
The only things OLMC listens to is money and bodies.