Given the fact that the nasal pharynx of the jabbed carries a viral load 251x that of a person infected with COVID19

Very interesting, never heard it before, what is your source for that comment?

Diocesan/Conciliar media liking what it’s reading from the SSPX on abortion jabs (and it sure didn’t take them long to find Fr. Selegny’s article):

https://thecentralminnesotacatholic.org/sspx-leader-says-vaccination-can-be-morally-prudent/


SSPX leader says vaccination can be morally ‘prudent’
September 24, 2021 Catholic News Service Nation/WorldNo comments

By Cindy Wooden | Catholic News Service
ROME (CNS) — While denouncing as an “abuse of power” coercive measures to promote vaccination against COVID-19, a leader of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X said getting vaccinated “may sometimes be an eminently prudent act in the moral sense of the term.”
Father Arnaud Sélégny, secretary general of the SSPX, also said if hospitals or nursing homes admit only chaplains who are vaccinated, priests should comply.
“If it is impossible to approach the dying to confer on them the sacraments without being oneself vaccinated, we should prefer the salvation of our neighbor to our own health or tranquility,” he wrote in an article posted Sept. 24 on the congregation’s website, fsspx.news.

Father Arnaud Sélégny of the Society of St. Pius X is pictured at the society’s seminary in Econe, Switzerland, in this May 10, 2012, file photo. Father Sélégny, secretary general of the SSPX, said that getting vaccinated against COVID-19 may be a morally prudent act. He also denounced as an “abuse of power” coercive measures to promote vaccination. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

“The absolute and categorical positions that are often widespread, such as that which tends to consider the vaccinated as Judas and those who refuse to do so as martyrs, or vice versa, seem at the very least excessive and sometimes mark an obvious lack of charity,” wrote Father Sélégny in his article on the most common moral, social and health arguments used for and against vaccination.
For many Catholics, the key moral question with the available COVID-19 vaccines is the fact that in the manufacturing or testing process, several of them used cell lines developed decades ago from the tissue of aborted fetuses.
Responding to the question, “Is the one who benefits from a past sin committing a sin himself?” Father Sélégny quoted St. Thomas Aquinas: “It is one thing to consent or concur with someone in wickedness, another thing to use the wickedness of someone for good.”
With the “tainted” COVID-19 vaccines, he said, “it is question not of an evil which one commits oneself, but of a sin committed by another: and this is why it is first necessary to reprove the past sin and not to consent to its malice.”
“In the present case, it should be remembered that, while abortion is a particularly heinous crime,” he said, the manufacturing and testing of the vaccines is indirect and remote. “Thus, when there is a valid reason proportionate to the possible dangers, it is not immoral to be vaccinated with a product which has been prepared or tested with the above-mentioned fetal cells.”
“The existence of a reasonable motive for consenting to be vaccinated is therefore possible,” Father Sélégny wrote, citing as examples the need to prevent “the inevitable loss of one’s professional activity or social responsibilities” where proof of vaccination is required or “the need to visit an elderly person to support him and not to leave him alone.”
While insisting vaccination should not be mandated by a government or employer, the priest said charity “sometimes requires making sacrifices to ensure the salvation or the good of one’s neighbor,” so, “if a health pass is needed to circulate, it may happen that the obligation to fulfill a duty of charity prompts us to agree to be vaccinated.”

One of the unfortunate consequences of this new article will be that those wishy-washy sspx trads will now have a reason to accept the covid vaccine. And also the post-trads(former trads) will cite the SSPX against those actual traditionalists who say that the vaccine is evil and dangerous.

See here for a rebuttal to Fr. Selegny's "remote material cooperation" in evil defense of taking the jab:

The author makes a persuasive case that the evil in question is formal, not material (as Fr. Scott initially taught):

https://www.superflumina.org/commentary-on-fr-selegnys-sspx-paper.html 

PS: I have also attached the PDF below (you must be loggen in to see it).

I cast no aspersions regarding motives, but it is undeniable that the effect of the SSPX’s sustained polemic on the death jab advances -wittingly or unwittingly- the accomplishment of the NWO hell planet.

You don't have to. This isn't some matter of the internal forum, where we should be charitable and/or mind our own business. This isn't about judging others' personal motives. This doesn't fall under "Judge not, lest ye be judged".

When a person stands up and promotes evil (an evil/sterilizing/deadly injection, the NWO, the Great Reset, the Novus Ordo Mass, Vatican II, etc.):

1. They must be vigorously, vocally, publicly opposed. It is not necessary to call names, cast aspersions on their parents, or attack them personally. No one would even suggest that you should: therefore when you see it, it is usually a red herring used by the enemies of God to confuse good people. It is a false dilemma: "Either be evil, filled with bitter zeal, and literally use a photo of Pope Francis for a dartboard, or go along completely with Vatican II."

2. In many cases, such as to avert grave evil(s) and for the public good, silence can actually be sinful -- one can sin mortally OR venially "by silence", "by consent", and at least 5 other ways.

3. When a man is objectively working evil, it doesn't matter "why" or what his secret motives are. He must be opposed for the objective error(s) and evil(s) he is promoting.

If a man is about to shoot an innocent person with a gun, you can morally use DEADLY FORCE to stop the attacker. It doesn't matter "why" he decided to commit that murder that day. Maybe he had a bad childhood. Maybe he was abused. Maybe he was insane with anger. WHO CARES. You oppose his evil, and let God sort out the internal forum stuff, mitigating circuмstances, and justice in general. The all-just God will judge all.

IN SHORT: When deciding on a course of action, all one can go by is the visible, public facts at hand. We must make (admittedly fallible) prudential decisions based on the facts as we know them. We don't have access to the innermost hearts of men, so that data is not available to us, as we make our multitude of prudential decisions each day. God certainly takes this into account when judging.

At best this vaccines does nothing. At worst it means death, while for many there has been severe ill effect. Some of the reasons to be jabbed like being allowed to work or visit elderly relatives are contrived regs to force people to get this strange therapy.

So let me get this straight, Fr. Selegny is okay with everyone taking the Covid Vaccine, so that means he's okay with infanticide, :ie aborted babies being used in production and testing . He evidently is also okay with Euthanasia because that's the original intent of these shots. They are not vaccines. The Pius X Society needs to change out their moral theologian . This absurdity can not stand in a civilized Society much less a Traditional Catholic Society.

The new-sspx should just stop talking about science.  Heliocentrism and evolution are ok, now this.  They can barely make passing marks in theology and liturgical history.  They get an F in science!