Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You act like this is just a sedevacantist issue (as per usual). R&R have their own set of dubious Bishop and priests now with the +?Pfeiffer situation.
This was a joke. I was poking fun of the ordinations performed by "Bishop Gonzalez" (used a pseudonym on the ordination certificate), who later denied that he had ordained Fathers Greenwell and Baumberger when he was questioned by Father Peter Scott, calling it an "ugly rumor". Basically, I was mocking the double standard of Bishop Kelly where his ordinations / consecrations are all certainly valid while multiple other groups' consecrations are not.
There was no indication that you were poking fun at anything. At least for those of us who are not "in the know" about sedevacantist ordination/consecrations.
Why can’t I down vote Ladislaus on this thread? Every time I try I get kicked off Cathinfo…(I normally agree with a lot of what Ladislaus posts. But on this thread it’s garbage).