Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: New Resistance Bishop- ELEISON COMMENTS - Fr Ballini  (Read 11884 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

New Resistance Bishop- ELEISON COMMENTS - Fr Ballini
« on: January 05, 2023, 01:07:02 PM »
STRENGTHENING TRADITION

(With apologies for the late appearance of this particular EC)

Early in the New Year there is due to be ordained, on the Emerald Isle another priest for Catholic
Tradition, by a bishop who is well-known in that country as a priest but not as a bishop. This is because
he was consecrated in private nearly two years ago, in January of 2021, when the false Covid crisis with
all its travel restrictions was in full swing. It then seemed that Éire might be completely cut off from
England for an indefinite length of time, and then what would have continued to protect in the Land of
Saints and Scholars those Catholics who understand the dangers for their Faith both of the Newchurch
and of the Newsociety of St Pius X ? These Catholics may not be numerous, but by their rare grasp of
the unchanging Catholic Faith they have for the future of the Church a rare importance. The precious
consecration might have remained private for longer, were not circuмstances seeming to become
steadily more hostile to Catholic Tradition.

Now as Catholic bishops are, by the power of their sacramental Orders to ordain priests and to
consecrate bishops, essential for the survival of the Church, so Traditional bishops have been essential to
the survival of Catholic Tradition. When Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops in 1988 without
the clear permission of the Church’s official leaders in Rome, let nobody think that he was simply
defying those leaders, because they had in fact given permission in principle for at least one to be
consecrated. But when it came to fixing a date for that one consecration, Cardinal Ratzinger so avoided
naming a date that the Archbishop saw clearly that he would never in practice be able to use the
permission granted to him in principle by Church Authority. That was the decisive moment for the
Archbishop to understand that Catholic Truth would never be properly defended by the modernists ruling
in “Rome”, and so he went ahead with the consecration of four of his own priests as bishops, to ensure
“Operation Survival”, as he called it, the very survival of Catholic Tradition.

At the time, many believing Catholics did not understand his action, and roundly condemned it, but
today, after Pachamama, and after Traditionis Custodes pretending to abolish the Traditional rite of
Mass, and after a host of other heresies coming from the summit of the Newchurch, many of those same
Catholics now admit that it is thanks to those consecrations of 1988 that the true Church survived. In the
unprecedented crisis of the Church precipitated by its own leaders splitting their Catholic Authority from
Catholic Truth at Vatican II (1962-1965), Archbishop Lefebvre never scorned or defied the true
Authority of the Church, he merely put the Truth of Tradition in front of that Authority as embodied in
neo-modernists, and by his so doing, more and more Catholics still have a Tradition to which they can
rally. Honest souls among them acknowledge Mother Church’s immeasurable debt to the Archbishop.
Now in the early 2020’s, Almighty God has still not yet seen fit to reunite Catholic Truth and Catholic
Authority, so that the neo-modernists are still in control of “Rome”, and the Faith needs still to be
sustained despite “Rome”. Therefore what the Archbishop began by putting Truth before Authority must
be continued. However, while Catholic Truth must be preferred in the last resort to Catholic Authority if
“Authority” opposes that Truth which it was only instituted by Our Lord to defend, nevertheless Truth in
a fallen world does need that Authority to protect it, so that without that Authority on high, Truth has real
difficulties. For instance the Archbishop’s successors had such problems in ruling the Society after his
death that by a policy of deferring to “Rome” much more than he would ever have done, they so changed
the Archbishop’s Society that it needs a new name, e.g. the “Newsociety”. And just as the mass of
Catholics after Vatican II followed their leaders from the Church into the Newchurch, so the mass of
followers of the Archbishop’s Society have followed his successors from his Society into what one can
call the “Newsociety”, because it strains after official approval by the neo-modernists of “Rome”.

Therefore as in 1988, or even more today, for the survival of Catholic Tradition, the necessity arises for the
consecration of bishops without Roman Authority, so to speak, to maintain the Archbishop’s defence of the
Faith above all. Hence the consecration in private of Fr Giacomo Ballini, here in England on January 14,
2021. The on-going Covid crisis showed how bravely he looks after the Mass and the Faith of all time.
Kyrie eleison
Today’s “Rome” will not properly care for sheep ?
We must have shepherds who will the true Faith keep !

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Resistance Bishop- ELEISON COMMENTS - Fr Ballini
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2023, 05:00:39 PM »
So he waited nearly two years to announce that this man was a bishop? Long after COVID ended?

What we really need is to start ordaining some hidden or underground priests ... because when the greater lockdowns come in the future, and priests are shut down, the faithful will be without the Sacraments.  While bishops are good, it's the priests who are most essential.  Of course, you need bishops to consecrate priests, but then why didn't this bishop REMAIN clandestine?  In fact, you probably need some clandestine bishops as well, those whom the world thinks are laymen but are really both priests and bishops.  I'm not advocating someone who's not qualified or competent or adequately trained, but to have them trained in secret, and ordained / consecrated in secret so that they can serve the faithful when (not if) this gets worse ... and it WILL get worse.  We have a bit of a breather after COVID-19.  Look what they got away with in terms of lockdowns, shutting down churches, and preventing priests from administering Last Rites for a "disease" that had a 1-2% fataility rate IF you believe their numbers (it was much lower).  Now, if/when they release another one that has even a 10-15% morality rate, it'll be a massive lockdown and people will lose all access to Sacraments.  COVID was used to pilot their program, a test run to see how people would react, and the sheep / lemmings went to the slaughter in droves for fear of the flu.  There are probably many former seminarians out there who could be tagged, who may have made it far enough along to be able to function reasonably to deliver the Sacraments to the faithful underground.  This is why Bishop Slupski sometimes ordained married men.  He grew up under Communist lockdowns where the Church went underground, and he knows very well what's coming our way.  People derided him for it, but I'm pretty sure he was right in that particular attitude.


Re: New Resistance Bishop- ELEISON COMMENTS - Fr Ballini
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2023, 05:09:12 PM »
Who says that there aren’t other privately consecrated bishops, and conditionally ordained priests….?

Re: New Resistance Bishop- ELEISON COMMENTS - Fr Ballini
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2023, 06:11:37 PM »
Fr Bellini is a Bishop?? That's great!

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: New Resistance Bishop- ELEISON COMMENTS - Fr Ballini
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2023, 06:16:37 PM »
Two bishops in every garage now :laugh1:

They're firing up the presses at The Angelus as we speak for a reworking of Father Cekada's old article.