Author Topic: NEW BP. FELLAY SO HORRIBLE INTERVIEW (Read 19801 times)

Incredulous · « **Reply #15 on:** March 02, 2016, 10:02:32 AM »

Quote from: AJNC

This interview series is titled "Conflict Zone" and hostility by the interviewer is part of the scenario. I think Bishop Fellay handled himself quite well.

I would agree, he handled himself appropriately for his new role as the international leader of "Trad-newChurch".

Gutless and wavering, none of this bishop's followers will be inspired to die for our Faith.

He took the liberal beating and handled himself as he's been coached to do.

Incredulous · « **Reply #16 on:** March 02, 2016, 10:08:12 AM »

Quote from: richard

Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey
Bishop Fellay was down in DC for the March for Life ( we weren't there) . Bishop Fellay was one of the very few if any to lead a procession during the March for Life. And the Rosary Crusades are awesome. We should pray for the man.

I've made some mistakes and made poor judgements. I'm sorry for that.

I want to be with Christ; not against Him.

Perhaps Bp.Fellay was there for political reasons.

I think you're correct.

Fr. Vegy is the marketing guru, who manages SSPX re-branding.
He was all over F+, taking photos with his German camera.

F+ was at the West coast Pro-life march the day before.
It was unprecedented PR, bringing him out like that.

AJNC · « **Reply #17 on:** March 02, 2016, 10:22:08 AM »

Quote from: trento

Agreed that Bishop Fellay seems unprepared to be bombarded by this fella with all sorts of politically-correct pointed questions. I truly believe someone like Bishop Tissier or Fr. Laisney would be able to demolish this guy easily. Unfortunately, Bishop Fellay is too much of a diplomat here and that wouldn't do.

I believe this program was put out by Deutsche Welle, Germany's international broadcaster. I doubt whether a hard-line attitude would have been productive with the general audience. Sure, its just my opinion, but I feel that Bp Fellay came out on top.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #18 on:** March 02, 2016, 10:28:13 AM »

richard:

Quote

Perhaps Bp.Fellay was there for political reasons.

Fellay does everything for political reasons. The man has always put politics above truth, IMO. The word 'politician' is the one which best describes this cleric' essence. This whole sorry mess might have been avoided early on if the Society founder's own wishes had been followed. Lefebvre did not want one of his bishops to become Superior General. What is more, ABL would certainly not have approved of this bishop being elected for a second term.

Gerard from FE · « **Reply #19 on:** March 02, 2016, 10:45:22 AM »

A bishop worth his salt could have dismantled this interviewer with humor, politeness and brains. The important part being the brains.

Interviewer:
"But.ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a sɛҳuąƖ orientation, pedophilia is a crime."

The use of a brain would answer:

"They are both crimes against God and both sɛҳuąƖ dis-orientations and some ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are also pedophiles and ephebophiles. Why do you think they would infiltrate the Church the way they have?"

Is Bishop Fellay on drugs or was he always only good using prepared statements by someone else? Much like Obama and his teleprompter.

Incredulous · « **Reply #20 on:** March 02, 2016, 11:01:31 AM »

Quote from: AJNC

Quote from: trento
Agreed that Bishop Fellay seems unprepared to be bombarded by this fella with all sorts of politically-correct pointed questions. I truly believe someone like Bishop Tissier or Fr. Laisney would be able to demolish this guy easily. Unfortunately, Bishop Fellay is too much of a diplomat here and that wouldn't do.

I believe this program was put out by Deutsche Welle, Germany's international broadcaster. I doubt whether a hard-line attitude would have been productive with the general audience. Sure, its just my opinion, but I feel that Bp Fellay came out on top.

Yes, the judaized, German media was bearing down on him, but this was why Bp. Fellay needed to counter his adversaries with the Truth.

Our Lord was consummate example of how to handle the "conflict interview".

And Bishop Fellay, being a direct descendant of the Apostles, needed to imitate his Master.

wallflower · « **Reply #21 on:** March 02, 2016, 11:43:27 AM »

Quote from: Cantarella

Quote from: Gerard from FE
If he can't handle and ignorant horse's ass, how can he handle Rome?

This whole video is shameful beyond words. Specially at the beginning of it, when asked about the Jєωs, Bishop Fellay adopts the attitude of a little boy trying to excuse himself, not even looking at the malicious journalist straight at the eye.

Pathetic. We are in desperate need of men of the caliber of Father Fahey to explain to the world what is it that we exactly mean when we say the Jєωs are the enemies of the Church of Christ.

I am 7 minutes in and I don't know if I can finish it because of this. I suspect this interview was accepted because they thought they could smooth things over and "correct" the media's "false interpretation" AND throw +Williamson under the bridge once again thereby making the SSPX a little more acceptable to the world. He is almost begging for the world to like us because it's all a big misunderstanding. It's embarrassing and my stomach is literally churning over it. I will likely finish it but in bits and pieces, I can't take a half hour at once.

I hesitate to criticize because it's easy to know what he should have said while we sit at our little keyboards at home. The keyboard warrior line is a hard one to see sometimes. But this is +Fellay's calling, these are the special graces he receives (as they are never remiss to remind us). With God such an interview can be well done, charitable but also filled with truth and strength. Or perhaps, with God such an interview would not take place since one would know the evil intentions behind them. Either way, it is a disappointing display and we know it is not God's fault.

In reality it IS a misunderstanding but it's one too profound to be corrected with squirms and buttering up. It's one that only Faith and grace can clear up.

stgobnait · « **Reply #22 on:** March 02, 2016, 12:46:10 PM »

I cannot bring myself to watch it, I have seen enough of BF's whimpering before, God send us MEN fit to fight for The Social Reign of Christ.

St Ignatius · « **Reply #23 on:** March 02, 2016, 02:45:17 PM »

I'd like to put my "Two-cents" into this... I don't think there's a question at all why Bp Fellay participated in this interview. All one has to do is look back seven years to the interview that was set up to bring down Bp Williamson once and for all (ha, ha). This was, as a whole, coordinated by the leadership of Menzingen. Remember "Krah-gate?" They knew exactly who these people were, and are. In this they passed the "Smell test" of the B'nai B'rith. Now Bp Fellay is now trying to pass the "Taste test" by appeasing to the whims of "Political correctness" rather that standing on the grounds of solid Principle. I haven't watched the video yet, but I believe from the comments here, it's another "Pass" towards the direction of Rome.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #24 on:** March 02, 2016, 02:48:46 PM »

Cantarela:

Quote

This whole video is shameful beyond words. Specially at the beginning of it, when asked about the Jєωs, Bishop Fellay adopts the attitude of a little boy trying to excuse himself, not even looking at the malicious journalist straight at the eye.

I'm looking about for a dictionary entry even more expressive than "shameful." I don't think "shameful" quite does Bp. Fellay justice. His simpering, deer-in-the-headlights response was beyond shameful. Of course, Sebastian, all but perched upon the SG's nose and staring malevolently into his eyes, starts things off with the Jєωs. +Fellay wilts like a flower in the hot sun.
I mean, my goodness, all the bishop said a couple of years ago was that the Jєωs had been enemies of the Church for centuries. The Church has declared nothing less from the beginning. Why did this 'leader of men' have to suggest that his remarks had created "unnecessary controversy?" Why did this SSPX commander and chief have to turn his own earlier words around, amending them to mean (incorrectly) that it was the Jєωs themselves who look upon the Church as an enemy. In other words, "It's not us, Mr. Sebastian sir, who view the Jєωs as enemies. No, no! it's the Jєωs who view us as enemies."
"Maybe I was not expressing myself correctly........" he finally whispers. This is a finger-down-one's-throat moment
Yes indeed, he is like a "little boy" caught with his hands in the cookie jar, afraid to express and reaffirm what his own Church has taught since Her inception.

Matthew · « **Reply #25 on:** March 02, 2016, 02:53:09 PM »

Newsflash -- the Archbishop would have handled this interview very differently -- more like +Williamson would handle it today if he were given the opportunity.

I hate to break it to the "Accordista" faction of the neo-SSPX, but +Fellay is none other than a sellout to the cause. He is *not* faithfully keeping the SSPX position of Archbishop Lefebvre. He is not his successor, not by any stretch of the imagination. Perhaps you can say that +Fellay controls +ABL's organization today. But that doesn't make him his "successor".

You can be an accordista and "want to try something different", but at least call it for what it is. A deer can't be the "successor", spiritual or physical, to a lion, not in any universe I'm aware of.

Just for starters, +ABL wouldn't have been ashamed of Church teaching on the Jєωs. And he would have hammered home Catholic doctrine at every opportunity, feeling no shame before the Modern World (represented by the reporter) which is swimming in every possible error.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #26 on:** March 02, 2016, 03:19:57 PM »

A true Catholic bishop should never let anyone treat him or speak to him in this way.

I took this whole thing as a joke. He should have never accepted to be interrogated. This is ridiculous. It makes me angry.

wallflower · « **Reply #27 on:** March 02, 2016, 03:22:06 PM »

Quote from: stgobnait

I cannot bring myself to watch it, I have seen enough of BF's whimpering before, God send us MEN fit to fight for The Social Reign of Christ.

Whimpering, thank you! That's the word I was looking for in my post but just couldn't think of it. Of course the interviewer didn't help since he cut off +Fellay before he could get out full sentences. But whimpering it certainly was.

Alexandria · « **Reply #28 on:** March 02, 2016, 04:12:33 PM »

Why do you think he did the interview?

Matthew · « **Reply #29 on:** March 02, 2016, 05:10:10 PM »

From the mailbag --

B.R. writes in:

Quote

I dont know how to post a response to this disgusting display from the interviewer and Fellays total lack of willingness to correctly and boldly explain the truth. What a coward. He was shaking in his boots I could hear it. He did not know weather to spit or go blind.