It is no longer the 1962 Missal since 2007, as the Good Friday Prayer has been changed.
The first step in many attacks and adaptations to come and be enforced.
One can only wonder what manner of assaults on the Faith are in the works!
I would just seek out a 1962 Missal from Angelus Press or buy an old missal yourself.
The problem with handmissals that are 60 years old is they tend to fall apart.
They used high quality paper, usually, so the pages are okay, but the cover and
the binding doesn't hold up well.
One should not overlook the 1945 Fr. Lasance New Roman Missal. They were
reprinted this century and cost around $60. It's an excellent daily missal, with
supplements for several feast days that were added post '45 and before Vat. II.
You just need to get a Movable Feasts table, as the one in the missal only goes
up to 1975 or so. Why they don't improve that is anyone's guess. It has just
about everything needed for the Canonized Latin Mass (the
Novus Ordo can never be canonized!). Also, the St. Andrew Daily Missal, issue 1950 or
thereabouts. Both of these have none of the corruptions that began in 1954
with Bugnini's innovations, starting with Holy Week, the most ancient rites in
the Church, arguably from Apostolic times.
Universae Ecclesiae changed the Good Friday prayer of the 1962 Missal.
In fact, the 1962 Missal itself had been tampered with too, but was and is still entirely orthodox Roman Catholic of course. But the removal of the 'perfidis' and 'perfidem' by John XXIII's order was already a political compromise which was false. In fact, the Good Friday Prayer for the Jews is older than many other Roman Rite prayers and formulae. It can be dated back to 244 AD text fragments, right in the Catacomb times.
The 2007 UE/SP revision of the 1962 Missal's Good Friday prayers is false and doctrinally doubtful (possibly heterodox formally, as it blurs the traditional teaching on the incredulity of the Jews).
Thank you! for the statement above which I put in bold letters. The New Good Friday prayer was changed in 1962 which means to me that the [break] happened then. The SSPX has kept the pre-1962 Good Friday prayer in their own version of the 1962 Missal along with the second Confiteor, etc. to make it more traditional. Many people in the SSPX did not know in 2007 that the prayer had been already changed in 1962.
They should have put some kind of footnote on the pages where such
acommodations were made, so that readers could see if they were interested in
knowing what that was. If no explanation is provided, I would really wonder why.
It seems to be a gross oversight, or at worst, a deliberate intention to deceive.
In 2007, the SSPX (Angelus Press) printed a large quantity of the actual 1962 Missal because they thought they would be selling to the Indult communities but Rome was one step ahead of them and had the Missal published by Baronius Press.
Thanks for the clue. I'd like to know who the owners of Baronius are.
Why do you think the 1962 Missal has always been regulated by an Indult[?] First JPII, Then, Summorum Pontificuм which ties it to the N.O as two expressions of the same rite. This indult was in reality more restrictive than JPII's because now, to have the "1962" missal you have to accept the N.O. as valid.
Not if you reject this stupid rule as "invalid," based on the fact that we're in a
state of emergency and the wires are crossed somewhere: possibly in the
Holy Father's own HEAD.
Also, why do you think Rome is now changing their agreement with IGS, they now want them regulated by "Summorum Pontificuм" which was released after their initial agreement. Rome wants them regulated by SP because the trap (leash) is in SP.
When a wild animal walks around in his homeland, he has no idea that a "trap"
has been laid for him, and walking normally, and stepping on the trap, it is
sprung and he is caught. Fortunately for us, we have the capacity to identify
the trap in advance and thereby avoid it. We do not have to obey illegitimate
orders. And this is why the SSPX should never sign any "deal" until Rome is
willing to sit down and openly discuss DOCTRINE.
Obedience to an order that is deceptive or opposed to the teachings of the
Church is not a good obedience. We have had time to learn by painful experience
what kinds of tricks these miscreants use to deceive the faithful and to render
their orders illegitimate.
Absolutely every indult community must be regulated by it because the 1962 missal is what the pope tells them it is. They have signed the 1989 Profession of Faith and they must obey.
That 1989 Profession of Faith isn't the first of its ilk. I asked a Modernist priest one
time to recite with me the Oath Against Modernism and he refused. He said that
it had been replaced by Paul VI. Now, I had known that the Oath was abandoned
sometime in 1965, right near the end of Vatican II (which in itself is rather telling)
but I did not know that it had a "replacement." I then asked this miscreant how I
could find a copy of the replacement, and he told me that it was some kind of
docuмent that I could find on the Vatican website. This was in 1999. I had just
started learning how to use an Internet computer. So I found a machine and did
my research. Long story short, it turned out to be a "Vatican Statement," not an
encyclical or a Bull or whatever. The Vatican Statements were located in a
separate part of the site. When I showed it to the priest, he said that yes, this was
the thing that replaced the Oath. It was an oath of fidelity to the Roman Pontiff.
So, no longer would clerics be answerable to God for faithfulness to Him, they
were to be answerable to the Pope instead, for faithfulness to the pope!
That says a lot.
Now is common knowledge why that is so. This is the missal that will lead to the "reform of the reform".
This topic begun because someone wanted to have proof that a "new 1962 Missal" is coming.
Like I said before, we'll know we're really in trouble when they start coming out
with revised Vatican I docuмents. They have already done some little revisions
on the Vat. II docs. Why not Vat. I as well? They rewrote the Latin Vulgate Bible
to use the Unclean Spirit of Vatican II language. They re-wrote the Psalter in the
1950's. They fabricated a new mass. They changed the Creed, using "I believe
... one in being with the Father ..., they rewrote the form of the sacraments -- all
except the essential form of Baptism (they deleted all the preparatory ritual that
had traditionally been used) and they changed the Exorcism form, such that the
exorcist was then using a ritual that did not expel the demons.
Topic: New 1962 Missal? (Read 13981 times)