Author Topic: New 1962 Missal? (Read 15702 times)

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #10 on:** July 06, 2012, 08:38:29 AM »

Quote from: TKGS

Thank you everyone for your responses, especially Marie Auxiliadora and stevusmagnus.

I had been aware of only a little of what was posted. It appears that the Conciliar vatican is even more insidious than I had imagined. Frankly, this information makes the Bishop Fellay initiative even more disturbing. Clearly, the vatican wishes to use the SSPX to develop the "reform of the reform".

The only thing, I think, that will thwart such efforts will ultimately be the lesser known organizations, such as the CMRI, and the many independent priests who will reject these initiatives.

This only applies to indult communities that have taken the "1989 Profession of Faith"
http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/teach/cdfoath.htm read it for yourself. See who has to take this oath, you'll find it at the bottom at the link given.:

NOTE: Canon 833, Nos. 5-8 obliges the following to make the profession of faith: vicars general, episcopal vicars and judicial vicars; "at the beginning of their term of office, pastors, the rector of a seminary and the professors of theology and philosophy in seminaries; those to be promoted to the diaconate"; "the rectors of an ecclesiastical or Catholic university at the beginning of the rector's term of office"; and, "at the beginning of their term of office, teachers in any universities whatsoever who teach disciplines which deal with faith or morals"; and "superiors in clerical religious institutes and societies of apostolic life in accord with the norm of the constitutions."

Using the pre-Bugnini Missal will avoid any confrontations with Rome because we have the claim of Inmemorial Tradition and is reinforced by Quo Primum http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius05/p5quopri.htm

magdalena · « **Reply #11 on:** July 07, 2012, 08:47:20 PM »

The "reform of the reform." The hybrid mass. The novus, novus ordo. Whatever you call it, the opus fellay-bxvi is bringing it on. So I hope you are ready to hop on board a sinking dinghy attached to an even greater sinking titanic. :shocked:

Better to return to the 1950 missal of Pope St. Pius X.

Roman55 · « **Reply #12 on:** July 07, 2012, 09:19:17 PM »

Yes, it is unfortunate, but we should have seen it all coming. Lackadaisical, lots and lots of MONEY, prosperous and spoiled....."OH...is it time to get up already for 11:30 am low mass? oh, what a drag....I don't know if I can bear the heat; haven't they yet put AC into that Church?"....
Rest assured: If this kind shows up at a True Trad Chapel to substitute....on their can they will land!
I'm certain the True Trads will not tolerate that attitude!

Sede Catholic · « **Reply #13 on:** July 07, 2012, 10:46:15 PM »

Quote from: magdalena

The "reform of the reform." The hybrid mass. The novus, novus ordo. Whatever you call it, the opus fellay-bxvi is bringing it on. So I hope you are ready to hop on board a sinking dinghy attached to an even greater sinking titanic. :shocked:

Better to return to the 1950 missal of Pope St. Pius X.

This post sets out the facts.

It also shows a good way that the Church could be saved:

We need the Traditonal Latin Mass without any changes.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #14 on:** July 08, 2012, 06:19:21 AM »

Quote from: Domitilla

Thank you, Marie Auxiliadora, for your great post. I have never understood why the SSPX continued the use of the 1962 Missal (yeah, yeah, I've heard the reasons ...) Now is the time to revert to the use of the 1950 Missal and avoid the offensive "reform of the reform".

Yep.

Them putting a heretic in charge of the CDF presents a nice opportunity for us to take a step back too, and go back to the 1954/1948 Missal.