The founder of the society which is now entrusted to the leadership of Bishop Fellay clearly distinguished between two churches, the false church of the council and the true church.  Archbishop Lefebvre, whose work has been entrusted to Bishop Fellay, called the occupants of the hierarchy of the conciliar church anti-Christs.  Clearly, the saint raised up by the Good God to protect and maintain the Faith, to keep alive the Bride of Christ, differs with Mr. McFarland as to where we can find the church.  

However, Mr. McFarland is merely echoing what he heard Bishop Fellay say in his recent conference:

"It is the church which gives this faith. The church is not something abstract.  It’s something very, very concrete, very real.  It has a head in Rome, the pope, it has bishops everywhere, the local bishop here, the hierarchy, that is the church.  This church which is appearing to us so deadly wounded, so full of errors, is at the same time, communicating this life to the souls who still want it.  The same church, these men of church, priests, bishops who are telling heresies, who are killing the soul, who are killing the faith, it is through them that Jesus continues to give the faith that saves, the grace that saves, that sanctifies.  You see it is about the same trial, it is so hard to accept that….. "

Unthinkable, isn't it, that the Society finds itself lead by a mind so confused that what kills simultaneously gives life.  The mind that leads the Society no longer understands the principles that are the cause for its existence.  This recent conference by Bishop Fellay ought to be heard in its entirely because it demonstrates in a painful manner the confusion that has taken hold in the Bishop's mind.

From where does this confusion come?  At least in part by spending too much time dialoging with anti-Christs.  

The founder of the society which is now entrusted to the leadership of Bishop Fellay clearly distinguished between two churches, the false church of the council and the true church.  Archbishop Lefebvre, whose work has been entrusted to Bishop Fellay, called the occupants of the hierarchy of the conciliar church anti-Christs.  Clearly, the saint raised up by the Good God to protect and maintain the Faith, to keep alive the Bride of Christ, differs with Mr. McFarland as to where we can find the church.  

However, Mr. McFarland is merely echoing what he heard Bishop Fellay say in his recent conference:

"It is the church which gives this faith. The church is not something abstract.  It’s something very, very concrete, very real.  It has a head in Rome, the pope, it has bishops everywhere, the local bishop here, the hierarchy, that is the church.  This church which is appearing to us so deadly wounded, so full of errors, is at the same time, communicating this life to the souls who still want it.  The same church, these men of church, priests, bishops who are telling heresies, who are killing the soul, who are killing the faith, it is through them that Jesus continues to give the faith that saves, the grace that saves, that sanctifies. You see it is about the same trial, it is so hard to accept that….. "

Unthinkable, isn't it, that the Society finds itself lead by a mind so confused that what kills simultaneously gives life.  The mind that leads the Society no longer understands the principles that are the cause for its existence.  This recent conference by Bishop Fellay ought to be heard in its entirely because it demonstrates in a painful manner the confusion that has taken hold in the Bishop's mind.

From where does this confusion come?  At least in part by spending too much time dialoging with anti-Christs.  

B16 effectively denies the principle of non-contradiction. +Fellay is learning well.

What kills simultaneously gives life. The Church, so deadly wounded and full of
errors, at the same time communicates life to souls who want it. The same men
of church who are telling heresies and killing the soul, killing the faith, give the
faith that saves, grace that saves, that sanctifies.

Why didn't he also explain that the same bishop who leads the Society also
destroys the society? Oh, wait, that wouldn't be very popular, would it?

I'm sure one can find this in another place, but I just happened to locate it here:

http://www.womenpriests.org/teaching/ratzing1.asp
 
"In the year 1987, in the spirit of Vatican II, the Tridentine Profession of Faith and the oath against modernism were replaced by a brief and summary profession".  [Paragraph 3]  This is what I would suspect the authorities in Rome to demand of the neo-SSPX if they were to come to an "agreement".