This seems to be a very interesting article. I couldn't find it on CI. I don't know how to upload a copy.
.
I wanted to print out a copy for a friend whose relative is looking for insight and direction regarding whether he should attend Novus Ordo "services." This article by Fr. Ruiz Vallejo really goes deep into the question and I'd like to share it with him, but the translation posted on ecclesia-militans is so pathetic that I know this person whom I have in mind will be entirely turned OFF by the bad grammar and word choices in English.
.
I'm posting this to find out if any CI members know whom I should contact for making corrections, before I do it and give the copy to my friend.
.
http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/Necessary_Precisions_Fr_Hugo_Ruiz_Vallejo.pdf
.
That is the source web page. Here is a copy of the first 2 pages or so, without images:
.

NECESSARY PRECISIONS TO [for] THOSE WHO RESIST

THE CONCILIAR FURY [Madness] AND ITS MISTAKES [Errors]

by
M.R.P. HUGO RUIZ VALLEJO
February 4 th 2017.

Catholic Priests, _who do their best in order to preserve the authentic inheritance of the Roman Apostolic Catholic Church, that is, the bimillennial Catholic Tradition_ , try to remain faithful to the teachings and directives that Mons. Lefebvre gave us with this precise objective. That is why every day we need to make new alerts and precisions, where required.

We are living times of demonic [diabolical] disorientation, of deep crisis in the Catholic Church, as well as in her members. It is not enough just knowing about this. We should not forget that evil is also seductive and is capable of adopting new appearances to better achieve its goals. That is the reason why true Catholics need to be cautious. ( “Watch and pray so that you do not fall into temptation”. St. Mc., XIV, 38 ) [St. Mk. xiv. 38 ]. Through the increasing disorientation, due to the crisis of authority in the Church, ( “I will hurt [strike] the shepherd and the sheep shall be scattered”. St. Mc. XIV, 27 ) It happens that even in those who have the sincere intention to save the Holy Tradition in the Catholic Church, there are gaps towards the attitude to be taken on certain matters and particularly in regard to certain situations.

The modern world of liberal nature [liberalism?] has no qualms about mixing;[ecuмenism?] furthermore, it loves mixtures.[indifferentism?] On the contrary, our Holy Religion asks us to flee away from evil, as well as the occasions of sin, which may be more than varied. [deviant?]

As far as I am concerned, as I said before, I try to conform myself to the directives that our Catholic and Saint Bishop Mons. Marcel Lefebvre gave us, also the directives of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pious X (F.S.S.P.X.), which he founded, as well as his Teachings and authentical [authentic] Catholic attitude of the F.S.S.P.X. until the (new-fraternity) gradually started to separate himself from the spirit of his founder.

In some midsts of the so-called “resistance”, they begin to give advises to the parishioners, which no longer correspond to those of our Bishop Mons. Lefebvre, our faithful Bishop. This is the main reason, why I want to point out various matters, which are of main importance, although nowadays, they seem to be less clear to somebody. At the end, I added a commentary in relation to the recent announcement given by Mons. Fellay about the imminence of an official agreement of the (new)-FSSPX with the conciliar Rome:

1º point: About the morality of the new mass and its attendance.

As we know, Pope Paul VI ordered the elaboration of the new mass (novus ordo) with such an ecuмenical criteria, thus worst of all, to six protestant pastors,1  who participated on it. For this and other reasons, Paul VI artificially produced a new mass, copied from the protestant mass [worship service]. However, it was ambiguous enough so as not to be whether formally heretical, nor formally Catholic. An ambiguous rite was created, but no less unavoidably poisoned by a protestant spirit.

The conclusion is that the new mass, due to its ambiguity, is not formally heretical; nevertheless because of his mistakes, it is indeed favourable to heresy. This is the reason why it can not be called neither a Catholic Rite, nor good in itself, because they are intrinsic characteristics.

From all these we can deduce that:

►The assistance to the new mass is not permissible. It is not licit. (Those who are aware of what the new mass is, morally we can no longer attend it).

►No one can ever be advised directly to go to the new mass. Although for serious reasons of prudence, one can simply leave someone in his ignorance or goodwill.

►The Holy Communion is the most perfect Way to participate in the Holy Mass. This is the reason why, one must not receive communion from consecrated hosts in the new mass.


1 The new mass was written as a protestant and not sacred at all:, it means a desacralized one. It was elaborated by one mason and 6 protestants. The mason was: card. Annibale Bugnini; as well as by 6 protestants, such as Rev. Ronald CD Jasper (anglican), Rev. Dr. H. Massey Pastor Jr. (methodist), A. Raymond George (methodist), Pastor Friedrich-Wilhelm Künneth, (calvinist), Rev. Eugene L. Brand, (methodist) and Pastor Max Thurian, (ThaizéComunity).

.
It goes on for 6 more pages.
.
One correction example I would propose is for the third bullet point near the bottom, above: "The Holy Communion is the most perfect Way to participate in the Holy Mass. This is the reason why, one must not receive communion from consecrated hosts in the new mass."
.
I would like to revise it to say, "Holy Communion is the most perfect way to participate in Holy Mass. This is the reason why one must not receive communion either in the new mass, or at Indult Masses where very possibly they're using some hosts left over from a Novus Ordo service."
.
Also, does anyone know what this ought to say in proper English?:
.

The modern world of liberal nature has no qualms about mixing; furthermore, it loves mixtures. On the contrary, our Holy Religion asks us to flee away from evil, as well as the occasions of sin, which may be more than varied.

Is there a copy available in the original, which I assume is Spanish? I could run it through my professional translation software and obtain thus a better English version.

I am sure the orginal will surface at some point. It is difficult to move back and forth between languages specifically because of idioms contained in a said language. Not knowing any Welsh or Finnish, as an example, makes learning Quenya aand Sindarin difficult a a hobby. ;D

As another aside, it was very interesting listening to a talk give by His Excellency +W in Poland, and hearing it translated/interpreted into Polish.