There is definitely a difference between a moral scandal or a teaching contrary to the faith that is accessible to the general public compared to an accusation such as, Bishop Roy allowed a couple to live together prior to marriage or that he gave communion to immodestly dressed girls.
The circuмstances and facts are not in accessible in the public domain.
I said earlier in this thread that these occurrences were PUBLICLY known at his parish. His duplicitous behaviour regarding the una cuм matter is accessible on YouTube, as I have shown, and we can see he does not apologize, or seem to realize, that his behaviour was duplicitous. I agree that a lot of his sermons, conferences, etc. are wonderful and edifying, but that does not excuse some things he has done, which are not irrelevant, but affect those under his care as his penitents.
It is important to point out, because people often move their entire families to go to these places, and then find out what was done online, is not reconcilable with what is actually done in person. In essence, I hope people are properly informed before making such decisions, and ask the priests the proper questions. What do you want me to do, retract my concern for others?
Topic: most vocal traditional bishop speaking with unmistakable clarity (Read 3224 times)