The KV publishes extremely irresponsible remarks, IMO. He talks about "dozens" of studies confirming his contention that modern Jєωs are descendants of the ancient Biblical Hebrews. Yet you mention only one of those alleged studies. Now you come up with this little chestnut:
It (i.e. claiming that modern Jєωs are Khazars) practically exonerates Jєωs from any responsibility for the Crucifixion. That's probably why the theory is most enthusiastically promoted by Jєωs themselves.
I won't ask for "dozens" of proofs on this score, simply, oh, five. Five is a reasonable number, I feel. Show me five Jєω-generated articles, or videos, or other media or historical sources, which clearly prove that modern Jєωs "enthusiatically" promote the Khazarian mythos in order to be exonerate themselves from any blame for the Crucifixion. If you can't do this, then I, for one, am forced to go on believing that you are a horse's behind.
I've posted more than one study. The familytreedna link I provided shows the YDNA results of almost two thousand Jєωs from countries as diverse as England to Poland to Iraq. Their YDNA lineages are mainly semitic. You can't argue with DNA.
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Jєωιѕнdnaproject/default.aspx?section=yresults
And heck, here are a few more studies which arrive at the same conclusion:
www.pnas.org/content/97/12/6769.full?sid=87fe5eab-25be-450d-8e72-ac3483580c4c“Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jєωιѕн populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level.
“Admixture estimates suggested low levels of European Y-chromosome gene flow into αѕнкenαzι and Roman Jєωιѕн communities . . . Jєωιѕн and Middle Eastern non-Jєωιѕн populations were not statistically different. The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jєωιѕн communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jєωιѕн communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jєωιѕн communities during and after the Diaspora.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274378/αѕнкenαzι Jєωs “share more common paternal lineages with other Jєωιѕн and Middle Eastern groups than with non-Jєωιѕн populations in areas where Jєωs lived in Eastern Europe, Germany and the French Rhine Valley. This is consistent with Jєωιѕн traditions in placing most Jєωιѕн paternal origins in the region of the Middle East.”
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020143http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687795/“individuals with full Jєωιѕн ancestry formed a clearly distinct cluster from those individuals with no Jєωιѕн ancestry.”
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7303/abs/nature09103.html“Most Jєωιѕн samples form a remarkably tight subcluster,” that “traces the origins of most Jєωιѕн Diaspora communities to the Levant.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797531/“Jєωιѕн populations show a high level of genetic similarity to each other, clustering together in several types of analysis of population structure. These results support the view that the Jєωιѕн populations largely share a common Middle Eastern ancestry and that over their history they have undergone varying degrees of admixture with non-Jєωιѕн populations of European descent.”
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929710002466The study "demonstrated distinctive Jєωιѕн population clusters, each with shared Middle Eastern ancestry, proximity to contemporary Middle Eastern populations, and variable degrees of European and North African admixture.”
“the genetic proximity . . .
is incompatible with theories that αѕнкenαzι Jєωs are for the most part the direct lineal descendants of converted Khazars or Slavs.”
www.pnas.org/content/107/37/16222.fullThe “αѕнкenαzι Jєωιѕн (AJ) population . . . has a common Middle Eastern origin with other Jєωιѕн Diaspora populations”
www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/07/31/1204840109.abstract?sid=8b13ff9e-e9fa-4d99-aedf-1699b727980a“These populations showed a high degree of endogamy and were part of a larger αѕнкenαzι and Sephardic Jєωιѕн group.”
http://www.jpost.com/Enviro-Tech/Jєωs-A-religious-group-people-or-race
"The author uses his observations to refute theories that αѕнкenαzι Jєωs are descendants of converted Khazars, a semi-nomadic people living in medieval Eurasia who welcomed Jєωs to their midst. He also reports that in addition to southern Europeans, the closest genetic neighbors to most Jєωιѕн groups were the Palestinians, Israeli Beduin and Druse."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/10/science/10Jєωs.html?_r=2&
“Jєωιѕн communities from Europe, the Middle East and the Caucasus all have substantial genetic ancestry that traces back to the Levant"
“αѕнкenαzιc and Sephardic Jєωs have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East, the two surveys find. The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long.”
Want more?
What exactly are you asking for? Five articles that promote the Khazar theory specifically to exonerate Jєωs from responsibility for the crucifixion, or five examples of Jєωs who promote the Khazar theory? If the latter, I can think of at least three: Arthur Koestler, Eran Elhaik, Shlomo Sand,
I understand, though, that you're only trying to deflect attention away from the DNA studies, which prove your position to be a lot of horsecrap.