Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11

Author Topic: More on Voris  (Read 4852 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline josefamenendez

Re: More on Voris
« Reply #35 on: May 21, 2020, 10:39:16 PM »
Quote from: Incredulous on May 21, 2020, 06:42:32 PM
Yes, he responded well.

But what is he?

A Catholic spokesman defending consiliarism?

He certainly doesn’t defend Catholic tradition.

That’s the mystery of E. Micheal Jones.
He's a really smart guy- lately he has been addressing the Vll issues(especially Nostra Aetate) in relation to the current apostasy. As usual he is naming no names ( Francis) but he seems to be a bit more honest about it. I think pride due to carrying water for the conciliar position for so long is keeping him from Tradition. It would be a great concession on his part. I wish he would just admit it. He is a pariah in the Novus Ordo  as he is too honest about the jews.
Logged

Offline LaramieHirsch

Re: More on Voris
« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2020, 12:16:41 AM »
Quote from: Sam Smith on May 21, 2020, 09:42:22 PM
Sure, just keep accusing those of us who want Wegner and the rest of those responsible for the keeping pervs in the SSPX around of working for Voris. You're not terribly capable of critical thinking.

On the contrary, Voris and Niles will probably be rewarded for their perseverance on the face of the dummies that can't stand the SSPX corruption being exposed. Why does it bother you so much, Lad? You have a favorite over there you don't want to see bite the dust?
ChurchMilitantTV die-hard fans are too dull-minded to understand that Trads are not upset that "CMTV is exposing the pedo problems of the SSPX."  Their dim-witted thinking can't grasp the idea that CMTV IS USING YEARS-OLD SCANDALS TO OBLIQUELY ATTACK THE SSPX IN AND OF ITSELF, BECAUSE IT SIMPLY EXISTS.

They cannot grasp this.  They're not tall enough for this ride.

And so, they keep their faith in Gary Virus.
Logged

Offline Incredulous

Re: More on Voris
« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2020, 06:20:01 AM »
Quote from: maccabeansoft on May 21, 2020, 08:25:06 PM
“ This man has been fighting with traditionalists for years and he is an anti-semitic con man”
BINGO!  We have winner!   :jester:
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: More on Voris
« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2020, 07:36:47 AM »
Quote from: Sam Smith on May 21, 2020, 09:42:22 PM
On the contrary, Voris and Niles will probably be rewarded for their perseverance on the face of the dummies that can't stand the SSPX corruption being exposed. Why does it bother you so much, Lad? You have a favorite over there you don't want to see bite the dust?

I don't believe that Voris' strong dislike for the SSPX stems from the issue of homo priests in the SSPX. He's had it in for the SSPX long before he wrote of the current problem. Are you not aware of that?

The SSPX has a negative article about Opus Dei on their website. It's my opinion that Voris, as well as Opus Dei, do not want a strong priestly fraternity who defends Tradition. Not that the SSPX is good at that anymore; they are actually rather wimpy nowadays.

We on this forum already know about some of cases that Voris has lately brought up, and we don't like it anymore than you do. That's what you and other defenders of Voris don't get. You can only see what Voris wants you to see. We are critical of the SSPX, but we do not trust a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ (even if he is celibate) narcissistic tabloid journalist to tell the truth. He has shown in the past that truth and sincerity are not a priority for him. He should have been honest from the beginning about his homo background and his affiliation with Opus Dei. And what about Simon Rafe? Doesn't he still work for CMTV? He was a writer of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ porn. Why would a supposedly honest person, who is trying to expose the homo agenda, keep someone like that around?
Logged

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: More on Voris
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2020, 08:06:09 AM »
Quote from: Sam Smith on May 21, 2020, 09:42:22 PM
Sure, just keep accusing those of us who want Wegner and the rest of those responsible for the keeping pervs in the SSPX around of working for Voris. You're not terribly capable of critical thinking.

On the contrary, Voris and Niles will probably be rewarded for their perseverance on the face of the dummies that can't stand the SSPX corruption being exposed. Why does it bother you so much, Lad? You have a favorite over there you don't want to see bite the dust?

Nice try, Sam.  I have called for +Fellay to be investigated and ousted from the SSPX ... unless he can come up with an adequate explanation for why he reassigned Frs. Abbet and Peignot.  Even if he comes up with an explanation, then he should be demoted and never allowed to hold rank in the SSPX again.  You continue to deliberately create this false dilemma between accepting every word written by Voris and Niles as true and objective vs. defending those who did wrong in the SSPX.  I am trying to sift the truth from the fiction.  I can't recall the details around Father Wegner, but if the Jassy case is all there is, then he probably deserves a demotion, but that's about it.  I've clearly articulated what I am "bothered" by; it's the smear jobs interlaced with the legitimate issues.

Your constant defense of every word from Voris and Niles suggests that you have some personal tie here.  I didn't say you worked for them, just that it's very probable based on your attitudes that you are somehow linked to them.  You signed up for an account right as the CM stories were coming out, have posted on almost nothing other than this issue, and you slavishly defend Voris & Niles on every point, even the ones that have been clearly debunked.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
« previous next »