Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Moran Russian Op?  (Read 985 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41860
  • Reputation: +23917/-4344
  • Gender: Male
Re: Moran Russian Op?
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2018, 11:38:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So, there is in fact a connection between Moran and with Slipij and Boretskyy.

    Quote
    We have found instead a letter from Bishop Boretskyy to Patriarch Josyph, containing a petition for acceptance under his jurisdiction of Bishop of the Ukrainian Orthodox Autocephalous Church in America Mykolay Ilnytskyy with two priests, Ivan Ropke and William Moran, from November 29, 1974. In a draft of the response letter Patriarch Josyph asks Boretskyy to send the original docuмents and to find out more about the canonical status of the requesters.


    Offline cebu

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 134
    • Reputation: +228/-54
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Moran Russian Op?
    « Reply #2 on: September 04, 2018, 06:01:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It is notable from the latest wrecusant that they do their usual snowflake self pity. Everyone is nasty and horrible saying nasty things about 'Fr' Poisson but they fail to mention that he has been conditionally 'ordained' by non bishop Moran and it seems that 'Fr' Poisson is active in the apostolate of the cult. How will they spin that one? They can't so they ignore it. In the meantime anyone who goes to 'Fr' Poisson for the sacraments is accepting the lie that Moran is a bishop (see Ecclessia Militans and the report of Fr Ortiz) . Perhaps that is why their numbers are falling everywhere. 

    Offline happenby

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2768
    • Reputation: +1077/-1637
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Moran Russian Op?
    « Reply #3 on: September 04, 2018, 01:32:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What ever happened to "doubt"?  One reason for the existence of the Resistance is "doubt" regarding the the SSPX loyalty to Tradition, and doubt in the NO.  No doubt that doubt about the biggest doubter, Fr. Pfeiffer, is subject to doubt by doubtees unless Fr Pfeiffer INSISTS there is no reason to doubt.  Just ask Fr. Hewko.  

    At least there's a chance that Fr Poisson may actually have faculties from the NO. There's no chance at all for the young men of the Kentucky seminary if they are ordained by this poser and infiltrator, Moran.  This steely insistence by Fr. Pfeiffer for people to have no doubt invites a new kind of resistance to Resistance ordinations, and further fracturing of Tradition.  He may have been doing this kind of thing for a long time, but this is about to get real bad when there is no doubt that there will be non-priests doing the mass in the Resistance.