Here then is the usual way the Earthmovers dismiss any objection to their mind-science, they make no allowances that anyone who is not being paid to kerep therir ideological cosmology alive can study the subject and make their own mind up about them.
Someone with a valid falsification of relativity would likely be inducted in his or her national academy of science and be a prime candidate for a Nobel prize. if such a falsification existed, it would be well known.
Even
possible falsifications are quite widely reported, and the data is reviewed by other scientists. (Experts sometimes make mistakes in their analysis, too.)
What a silly question. Determining where a satellite is orbiting the earth has nothing to do with a particular universal model. But while I am on it I will show you who uses the Geocentric model to determine other cosmic bodies.
Geosynchronous orbits around earth would probably be calculated with a geocentric coordinate system, so this should be a softball to you. But the cooordinate system is not the issue. Any coordinate system
could be used.
No, my question is to 1) find out whether you think the earth is rotating or not, and 2) determine whether your geocentric system has any predictive ability.
The standard model can determine geosynchronous orbit for earth, mars, the moon, or any other body using the same method. As far as I can tell, a geocentric "universal model" means that some other mechanism makes an orbit geosynchronous for earth - and at exactly the same location that would be calculated if earth behaved just like any other planet, even though geocentrists think it doesn't behave like any other planet.