...If you think for one second, Msgr Fellay, that I'm going to close IA you have another thing coming!
Why don't you concentrate on getting your own house in order before attempting to bring down ours?
The same question could be asked of B16.
The same question could be asked of various cardinals and bishops worldwide.
When someone trying to protect the Faith complains to them that there is
an abuse going on, the only answer is to give the abuser MORE power.
It's as if these Modernist authorities use the complaints they receive from
the faithful as proof that the abusers are doing the RIGHT things.
And then they have the nerve to demand that the SSPX accept the new mass
and Vat.II before any normalization can take place? Apparently to them, any
"normalization" would mean the SSPX has become "normal" if it is corrupted.
Think of Lot in Sodom, looking for 10 good men. Those perverts wanted to make
Lot and his companions like themselves. They could not bear the thought that
someone was in their midst who was not homosexual or at least inclined so.
The inhabitants of Sodom were trying to "normalize" Lot and his friends.
In the end, homosexual activists will not rest until the law is changed, making
it illegal to be opposed to homosexuality on the basis that it's "normal" to be a
pervert. "Normalization" can mean something else to a mind like that.
+Fellay only wants to bring down IA if it can't be "normalized." It's a different
way of thinking. In his mind, his own house IS "in order." That's the problem.
He's had 18 years to evoke the very "order" that you see manifest in everything
that comes out of Menzingen these days. Everything. Regardless of whether he
has the fortitude to honestly explain it in terms his listeners can understand, we
can know what's going on because we can see what's going on. His works are
I know SSPX supporters who refuse to believe it's possible that +Fellay has a
different perception of reality between his hears than they would presume he has.
And when I bring up these things, their response to me is, "It sounds like you are
anti-Fellay." This same thing happened when Hannibal Bugnini invaded Rome.
Only this time he didn't need any elephants.
+Fellay doesn't need any elephants either! :geezer: