OK Ethelred. "Our" Mueller has written 400 tracts and books on (against?) the Faith. Why so many? In a time of financial rationalization and cuts at universities, were the theology faculties adversely affected - or do they keep churning out reams of high-sounding material? Is it "Them" who keep these (anti) Christian theological faculties going, I wonder?
Most of the Buddhist commentaries available in bookshops are written by European and American converts. If you are a Muslim you cannot write about that religion without clearance from the mullahs. In India, you will never find any criticisms or scrutiny of Hindu mythology.
Yet a Blah Blah now heads the CDF.
Surely it is "them" who support the Newchurch unofficially in several propagandist ways -- not because "they" like the Newchurch but because "they" know from their master, the Antichrist, that this will help destroying the true Church.
Because basically Vatican II is just the result of the
»Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita«.
In return the Newchurch has to do several favours to them, too, like for example proclaiming the anti-Christian "h0Ɩ0cαųst" lie officially as de-facto-dogma. The Newpope's speaker Lombardi
and Müller did this several times (saying: those who don't believe the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" are not longer Catholics; whilst on the same time they deny many if not most real dogmas).
The inter-connections are many. For example the Jєωιѕн mole in the SSPX, Max Krah, always propagated as his hero the Newpope B16, since Krah entered the SSPX in around 2005/2006. So, years before "Bp Fellay and his gang" (© Bishop Williamson) openly propagated an agreement with Newrome and the Newpope, Krah already publicly glorified the Newpope who, together with JP2, surely is the biggest destroyer of the Church.
Today we understand these things better, when it's too late.
The alliance between the Newchurch, the Freemasons, the Jєωs, the Buddhists, the Moslems, and so on, must not always be fully intentional. It's the Devil himself who coordinates these people.